This study examines the consistency of Pierre Bourdieu’s homology thesis by assessing, at a class-fraction level, the statistical significance of the differences in taste and lifestyle reported in Distinction. According to Bourdieu, taste and lifestyle vary not only from one social class to another, but also within social classes themselves, depending on the type of capital (notably, cultural or economic) that prevails among class fractions. In this article, we estimate the cultural distance separating eight fractions of the middle and upper classes by performing bilateral between-proportion comparison tests. Two levels of analysis are considered: the intra-class and the inter-class fraction levels. The first level only involves within-class comparisons. It aims to test the empirical basis of the concept of capital composition. The second level only involves comparisons between middle-class and upper-class fractions. It aims to test Bourdieu’s representation of social space. Results indicate that 1) the composition of capital is associated with taste variability in both the middle and upper classes, and 2) taste similarities and dissimilarities between fractions belonging to different classes are linked to cultural capital. In sum, this study provides additional evidence for the consistency of Bourdieu’s homology thesis.
BennettTSavageMSilvaEWardeAGayo-CalMWrightD (2009) Culture, Class, Distinction. New York: Routledge.
2.
BourdieuP (1979) La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
3.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
BourdieuP (1987) What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology32: 1–17.
5.
BourdieuP (1989) Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory7(1): 14–25.
6.
BourdieuP (1998) Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
BourdieuPde Saint MartinM (1976) Anatomie du goût. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales5(2): 2–81.
8.
BrissonRBianchiR (2015) La distinction: addendum statistique. Canadian Review of Sociology52(4): 450–461.
9.
BrysonT (1996) ‘Anything but heavy metal’: Symbolic exclusion and musical dislikes. American Sociological Review61(5): 884–899.
10.
CailléA (1994) Don, intérêt et désintéressement: Bourdieu, Mauss, Platon et quelques autres. Paris: La Découverte.
11.
CalhounCLiPumaEPostoneM (eds) (1993) Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
CiboisP (1997) Les pièges de l’analyse des correspondances. Histoire & Mesure12(3–4): 299–320.
13.
CoulangeonPDuvalJ (eds) (2013) Trente ans après La Distinction de Pierre Bourdieu. Paris: La Découverte.
14.
CoulangeonPLemelY (2007) Is ‘distinction’ really outdated? Questioning the meaning of the omnivorization of musical taste in contemporary France. Poetics35(2–3): 93–111.
15.
CoulangeonPLemelY (2009) The homology thesis: Distinction revisited. In: RobsonKSandersC (eds) Quantifying Theory: Pierre Bourdieu. Toronto: Springer, pp. 47–60.
16.
ElsterJ (1982) Le pire des mondes possibles: À propos de La distinction de Pierre Bourdieu. Commentaires3(19): 442–451.
17.
FowlerB (1997) Pierre Bourdieu and Cultural Theory: Critical Investigations. London: Sage.
18.
FowlerB (ed.) (2000) Reading Bourdieu on Society and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
19.
GoldthorpeJH (2002) Occupational sociology, yes: Class analysis, no: Comment on Grusky and Weeden’s ‘research agenda’. Acta Sociologica45(3): 211–217.
20.
GoldthorpeJHMarshallG (1992) The promising future of class analysis: A response to recent critiques. Sociology26(3): 381–400.
21.
GrenfellMLebaronF (eds) (2014) Bourdieu and Data Analysis: Methodological Principles and Practice. Bern: Peter Lang.
22.
GruskyDBSørensenJB (2001) Are there big social classes? In: GruskyDB (ed.) Social Stratification: Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspectives, 2nd edn.Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 183–194.
23.
GruskyDBWeedenKA (2001) Decomposition without death: A research agenda for a new class analysis. Acta Sociologica44(3): 203–218.
24.
GruskyDBWeedenKA (2005) The case for a new class map. American Journal of Sociology111(1): 141–212.
25.
HalleD (1992) The audience for abstract art: Class, culture, and power. In: LamontMFournierM (eds) Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 131–151.
26.
HoltDB (1998) Does cultural capital structure American consumption?Journal of Consumer Research25(1): 1–25.
27.
JenkinsR (1992) Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.
28.
KingstonPW (2000) The Classless Society. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
29.
LahireB (ed.) (1999) Le travail sociologique de Pierre Bourdieu: Dettes et critiques. Paris: La Découverte.
30.
LahireB (2006) La culture des individus: Dissonances culturelles et distinction de soi. Paris: La Découverte.
31.
LebaronF (2009) How Bourdieu ‘quantified’ Bourdieu: The geometric modelling of data. In: RobsonKSandersC (eds) Quantifying Theory: Pierre Bourdieu. Toronto: Springer, pp. 11–29.
32.
LenskiGE (1952) American social classes: Statistical strata or social groups?American Journal of Sociology58(2): 139–144.
33.
LiebersonS (1992) Einstein, Renoir, and Greeley: Some thoughts about evidence in sociology (1991 Presidential Address). American Sociological Review57(1): 1–15.
34.
Mendieta y NúñezL (1946) The social classes. American Sociological Review11(2): 166–176.
35.
OeschD (2006) Redrawing the Class Map: Stratifications and Institutions in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
PakulskiJWatersM (1996) The Death of Social Class. London: Sage.
37.
RobsonKSandersC (eds) (2009) Quantifying Theory: Pierre Bourdieu. Toronto: Springer.
38.
SallazJJZaviscaJ (2007) Bourdieu in American Sociology, 1980–2004. Annual Review of Sociology33: 21–41.
39.
SilvaEWardeA (eds) (2010) Cultural Analysis and Bourdieu’s Legacy: Settling Accounts and Developing Alternatives. London: Routledge.
40.
SusenSTurnerBS (eds) (2011) The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays. London: Anthem Press.
41.
SwartzD (1997) Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
TampubolonG (2008) Distinction in Britain, 2001/2004? Unpacking homology and the ‘aesthetics’ of the popular class. European Societies10(3): 403–428.
43.
Vander SticheleALaermansR (2006) Cultural participation in Flanders: Testing the cultural omnivore thesis with population data. Poetics34(1): 45–64.
44.
VeenstraG (2010) Culture and class in Canada. Canadian Journal of Sociology35(1): 83–111.
45.
VeenstraG (2015) Class position and musical tastes: A sing-off between the cultural omnivorism and Bourdieusian homology frameworks. Canadian Review of Sociology52(2): 134–159.
46.
Verdès-LerouxJ (2001) Deconstructing Pierre Bourdieu: Against Sociological Terrorism from the Left. New York: Algora.
47.
WeberM (1978 [1922]) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
