The ongoing collective effort to turn historical sociology into a globally oriented research programme implies a profound reconsideration of its conceptual and terminological premises, as well as a constant critical gaze over the colonial geopolitics of knowledge sociological thinking draws legitimation from. Three strategies are here discussed canonization, re-signification and re-conceptualization.
AbbottA (1991) History and sociology: The lost synthesis. Social Science History15: 201–238.
2.
AbramsP (1980) History, sociology, historical sociology. Past and Present87: 3–16.
3.
AdamsJClemensEOrloffAS (eds) (2004) Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, Sociology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
AscioneG (2014) Unthinking modernity: Historical-sociological, epistemological and logical pathways. Journal of Historical Sociology27(4): 463–489.
5.
AscioneG (2015) Dissonant notes on the post-secular: Unthinking secularization in global historical sociology. Journal of Historical Sociology. Epub ahead of print 8December. DOI: 10.1111/johs.12116.
6.
AscioneG (2016a) Science and the Decolonization of Social Theory: Unthinking Modernity. London: Palgrave.
7.
AscioneG (2016b) Decolonizing the ‘global’: The coloniality of method and the problem of the unit of analysis. Cultural Sociology10(3): 317-334.
8.
BakhtinM (1984) Rebelais and His World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9.
BhambraG (2007a) Sociology and postcolonialism: Another ‘missing’ revolution?Sociology41(5): 871–884.
10.
BhambraG (2007b) Rethinking Modernity: Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination. London: Palgrave.
11.
BhambraG (2014) Connected Sociologies. New York: Bloomsbury.
12.
BhambraG (2016) Comparative historical sociology and the state: Problems of method. Cultural Sociology10(3): 335-351.
13.
BlautJM (1993) The Colonizer’s Model of the World: Geographical Diffusionism and Eurocentric History. New York and London: The Guilford Press.
14.
BurawoyM (2005) Conclusion: Provincializing the social sciences. In: SteinmetzG (ed.) The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 508–525.
15.
CazenaveNA (2014) Conceptualizing Racism: Breaking the Chains of Racially Accommodative Language. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
16.
ChambersI (2003) Culture after Humanism: History, Culture, Subjectivity. London: Routledge.
EleyG (2007) Historicizing the global, politicizing capital: Giving the present a name. History Workshop Journal63(1): 154–188.
23.
EscobarA (2008) Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. New York: Princeton University Press.
24.
FanF (2012) The global turn in history of science. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal6(2): 249–258.
25.
FanF (2016) Modernity, region, and technoscience: One small cheer for Asia as method. Cultural Sociology10(3): 352-368.
26.
GoJ (2014) Occluding the global: Analytic bifurcation, causal scientism, and alternatives in historical sociology. Journal of Globalization Studies5(1): 122–136.
27.
GrosfoguelR (2004) The implications of subaltern epistemologies for global capitalism: Transmodernity, border thinking, and global coloniality. In: AppelbaumRPRobinsonWI (eds) Critical Globalization Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 283–293.
28.
InglisD (2013) What is worth defending in sociology today? Presentism, historical vision and the uses of sociology. Cultural Sociology8(1): 99–118.
29.
LathamME (2000) Modernization as Ideology: American Social Science and ‘Nation Building’ in the Kennedy Era. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
30.
Lombardi-DiopCRomeoC (eds) (2012) Post-Colonial Italy: Challenging National Homogeneity. London: Palgrave.
31.
LoweL (2015) The Intimacies of Four Continents. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
32.
McMichaelP (1990) Incorporating comparison within a world-historical perspective: An alternative comparative method. American Sociological Review55(3): 384–397.
33.
McMichaelP (2000) World-systems analysis, globalization and incorporated comparison. Journal of World-System ResearchVI(3): 668–699.
34.
MagubaneZ (2005) Overlapping territories and intertwined histories: Historical sociology’s global imagination. In: AdamsJClemensEOrloffAS (eds) Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, Sociology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp.92–108.
35.
MagubaneZ (2016) American sociology’s racial ontology: Remembering slavery, deconstructing modernity, and charting the future of global historical sociology. Cultural Sociology10(3): 369-384.
36.
MignoloWD (2007) Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural Studies21(2–3): 449–514.
37.
O’Connell DavidsonJ (2015) Modern Slavery: The Margins of Freedom. London: Palgrave.
38.
OuthwaiteW (1988) Concept Formation in Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
39.
PatelS (ed.) (2009) The ISA Handbook of Diverse Sociological Traditions. London: Sage.
40.
PoulantzasN (1973) Political Power and Social Classes. London: New Left Books.
41.
QuijanoAWallersteinI (1992) Americanity as a concept. International Social Science Journal134: 549–557.
42.
RosenbergJ (2004) The Follies of Globalisation Theory: Polemical Essays. London: Verso.
43.
SaidE (1979) Imaginative Geography and Its Representations: Orientalizing the Oriental. New York: Vintage.
44.
SethS (2009) Historical sociology and postcolonial theory: Two strategies for challenging Eurocentrism. International Political Sociology3(3): 334–338.
45.
SethS (2016) Is thinking with ‘modernity’ Eurocentric?Cultural Sociology10(3): 385-398.
46.
SteinmetzG (2007) The historical sociology of historical sociology: Germany and the United States in the twentieth century. Sociologica1(3).
47.
SteinmetzG (ed.) (2013) Sociology and Empire: The Imperial Entanglements of a Discipline. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
48.
SubrahmanyamS (1997) Connected histories: Notes towards a reconfiguration of early modern Eurasia. Modern Asian Studies30(3): 735–762.
49.
SubrahmanyamS (2007) Historicizing the global, or labouring for invention?History Workshop Journal64(1): 329–334.
50.
TaylorC (2004) Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
51.
ToyeJToyeR (2004) The UN and Global Political Economy: Trade, Finance, and Development. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
52.
WagnerP (2010) Successive modernities and the idea of progress: A first attempt. Distinktion21: 9–24.
53.
WallersteinI (1991) Unthinking Social Science: The Limits of Nineteenth-Century Paradigms. New York: Temple University Press.