Linguistic Capital and Development Capital in a Network of Cultural Producers: Mutually Valuing Peer Groups in the ‘Interactive Fiction’ Retrogaming Scene
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2016
Linguistic Capital and Development Capital in a Network of Cultural Producers: Mutually Valuing Peer Groups in the ‘Interactive Fiction’ Retrogaming Scene
This article reports on a mixed-methods study of the cultural valuing of ‘interactive fiction’ or ‘text adventure games’: a formerly commercial videogame genre sometimes associated with electronic literature but here argued to be best understood in context of the under-researched phenomenon of ‘retrogaming’ or ‘old school gaming’. It is argued that a model for the study of retrogaming scenes is provided in Lena and Peterson’s account of ‘traditionalist’ musical genres, and that these in turn exhibit similarities with Bourdieu’s ‘field of restricted production’. On the basis of qualitative analysis of interviews and documents and quantitative analysis of valuing behaviour on a website used by the interactive fiction community, it is proposed that entrance into the mutually-valuing peer group of interactive fiction developers is facilitated by possession of two intangible resources: linguistic capital (in the form of proficiency in Standard English) and development capital (in the form of expertise with programming languages specific to the production of interactive fiction), where development capital is a new concept that may be extensible to other technically-oriented digital cultures (for example, the working cultures of professional software developers and the communities that form around open source projects). Expressions of value in the form of star ratings were collected procedurally through data scraping, and represented as a directed graph. Seidman’s k-core was innovatively used as an instrument for detecting mutually-valuing peer groups within that graph. It is argued that this methodology has general application for the study of cultural value and its production within social networks (both online and off), including networks associated with more established cultural fields such as art and literature.
AllingtonDDueckBJordanousA (2015) Networks of value in electronic music: SoundCloud, London, and the importance of place. Cultural Trends24(3): 211–222.
6.
AnheierHKGerhardsJRomoFP (1995) Forms of capital and social structure in cultural fields: Examining Bourdieu’s social topography. American Journal of Sociology100(4): 859–903.
7.
BennettA (2002) Music, media, and urban mythscapes: A study of the ‘Canterbury Sound’. Media, Culture, and Society24(1): 87–100.
8.
BerkersP (2009) Ethnic boundaries in national literary histories: Classification of ethnic minority fiction authors in American, Dutch and German anthologies and literary history books, 1978–2006. Poetics37(5/6): 419–138.
9.
BlankMLeblingDDanielsBAndersonT (1980) Zork: The Great Underground Empire – Part I. Cross-platform. Cambridge, MA: Infocom.
10.
BotteroWCrossleyN (2011) Worlds, fields, and networks: Becker, Bourdieu, and the structures of social relations. Cultural Sociology5(1): 99–119.
11.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJG (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press.
12.
BourdieuP (1993a [1983]) The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. In: The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, trans NiceR. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 29–73.
13.
BourdieuP (1993b [1985]) The market of symbolic goods. In: The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, trans SwyerR. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 112–144.
14.
BourdieuP (1993c [1980]) The production of belief: Contribution to an economy of symbolic goods. In: The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, trans NiceR. Cambridge: Polity Press, 74–111.
15.
BradenLE (2009) From the armory to academia: Careers and reputations of early modern artists in the United States. Poetics37(5/6): 439–455.
16.
ConsalvoM (2007) Cheating: Gaining Advantage in Videogames. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
CrossickGKaszyńskaP (2014) Under construction: Towards a framework for cultural value. Cultural Trends23: 120–131.
18.
CrowtherW (1976) Adventure. PDP-10. Produced by author.
19.
CrowtherWWoodsD (1977) Adventure. PDP-10. Produced by author.
20.
De NooyW (1999) A literary playground: Literary criticism and balance theory. Poetics26(5/6): 385–404.
21.
De NooyW (2003) Fields and networks: Correspondence analysis and social network analysis in the framework of field theory. Poetics31(5/6): 305–327.
22.
De NooyW (2008) Signs over time: Statistical and visual analysis of a longitudinal signed network. Journal of Social Structure9(1).
23.
De NooyWMrvarABatageljV (2005) Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences27. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Electronic Literature Organisation (2012) About the ELO/Electronic Literature Organisation. Available at: eliterature.org/about (accessed 3 December 2012).
25.
GolumbiaD (2009) The Cultural Logic of Computation. Cambridge, MA/ London: Harvard University Press.
26.
HaylesNK (2008) Electronic Literature: New Horizons for the Literary. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.
27.
HaylesNKMontfortNRettbergSStricklandS (eds) (2006) The Electronic Literature Collection, volume 1. College Park, MD: Electronic Literature Organisation.
28.
JerzDG (2007) Somewhere nearby is colossal cave: Examining Will Crowther’s original ‘Adventure’ in code and in Kentucky. Digital Humanities Quarterly1(2).
29.
KlimasC (2009) Twine. Cross-platform. Produced by author.
30.
LenaJCPetersonRA (2008) Classification as culture: Types and trajectories of music genres. American Sociological Review73(5): 697–718.
31.
LewisKKaufmanJGonzalezMWimmerAChristakisN (2008) Tastes, ties, and time: A new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Social Networks30(4): 330–342.
32.
LopesP (2000) Pierre Bourdieu’s fields of cultural production: A case study of modern jazz. In: BrownNSzemanI (eds) Pierre Bourdieu: Fieldwork in Culture. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 165–185.
33.
MaherJ (2006) Chapter 11: The state of IF today. Let’s Tell a Story Together: A History of Interactive Fiction. Available at: http://maher.filfre.net/if-book/if-11.htm (accessed 3 December 2012).
34.
MillingtonID (2010) Undum. Cross-platform. Produced by author.
MontfortN (2004) Interactive fiction as ‘story’, ‘game’, ‘storygame’, ‘novel’, ‘world’, ‘literature’, ‘puzzle’, ‘problem’, ‘riddle’, and ‘machine’. In: First Person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press, 310–317.
37.
MontfortN (2005) Twisty Little Passages: An Approach to Interactive Fiction. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.
38.
NelsonG (1993) Inform. Cross-platform. Produced by author.
NishikadoT (1978) Space Invaders. Videogame cabinet. Tokyo: Taito.
41.
PackardE (1979) The Cave of Time. New York: Bantam Books.
42.
PaolilloJC (2008) Structure and network in the YouTube core. In: Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Waikoloa, Hawaii, 7–10 January 2008. New York: IEEE.
43.
RaymondES (1999) The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
44.
RettbergS (2009) Communitising electronic literature. Digital Humanities Quarterly3(2).
45.
RobertsMJ (1987) Text Adventure Development System. Cross-platform. Palo Alto, CA: High Energy Software.
