This study discusses Habermas’s notions of ‘public sphere‘ and ‘power’, and suggests a novel approach by complementing Habermas’s limited take on the ‘political’ with Bourdieu’s notion of ‘symbolic power’. To this end, ‘cultural citizenship’ is used as a helpful concept. The study draws on the analysis of a Turkish talk show format ‘woman’s voice’ (WV) and its audience. It is proposed that viewing WV should be considered a political activity. An analysis of women’s first-hand narrations of the domestic and symbolic violence in their lives reveals that many women continue to live under the patriarchal authority of the ‘honour code’ and the Turkish ruling elite have until recently neglected the needs of these women. WV provides a sphere where the needs and problems of these women are discussed for the first time in Turkish broadcasting history. It is shown with examples from field research that WV may potentially create subversive subject-positions among the disadvantaged groups of women, such as rural-urban migrants.
Aksoy, A., and Robins, K. ( 1997) ‘Peripheral Vision: Cultural Industries and Cultural Identities in Turkey’, Environment and Planning A29: 937-52.
2.
Asena, D. ( 1987) Kadının Adı Yok (The Woman has no Name). Istanbul: Afa Yayınları .
3.
Benhabib, S. ( 1992) ‘Models of Public Space: Hannah Arendt, the Liberal Tradition, and Jurgen Habermas’s, in C. Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere, pp. 73-98. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1990) In Other Words: Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1996) The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1998) Practical Reason. Cambridge: Polity.
7.
Brunsdon, C. ( 2000) The Feminist, the Housewife, and the Soap Opera. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
8.
Carpignano, P., Andersen, R., Aronowitz, S. and DiFazio, W. ( 1993) ‘Chatter in the Age of Electronic Production: Talk Television and the "Public Mind"’, in B. Robbins (ed.) The Phantom Public Sphere, pp. 93-120. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
Corner, J. ( 1995) Television Form and Public Address. London: Edward Arnold.
10.
Delaney, C. ( 1991) The Seed and the Soil: Gender and Cosmology in Turkish Village Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
11.
Dillon, E.M. ( 2004) The Gender of Freedom: Fictions of Liberalism and the Literary Public Sphere. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
Ertürk, Yakin ( 1995) `Rural Women and Modernization in Southeastern Anatolia’ , in Sirin Tekeli (ed.) Women in Modern Turkish Society: A Reader, pp. 141-152. London: Zed Books.
13.
Foucault, M. ( 1984) ‘What Is an Author?’, in P. Rabinow (ed.) The Foucault Reader, pp. 4-60. New York: Pantheon.
14.
Fraser, N. ( 1985) ‘What’s Critical about Critical Theory? The Case of Habermas and Gender’, New German Critique35(Spring/Summer): 97-103.
15.
Gamson, J. ( 1998) Freaks Talk Back: Tabloid Talk Shows and Sexual Nonconformity . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Habermas, J. ( 1984) The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume I: Reason and Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
17.
Habermas, J. ( 1987) The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume II: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
18.
Habermas, J. ( 1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
Hermes, J. ( 1997) ‘Gender and Media Studies: No Woman, No Cry’ , in J. Corner, P. Schlesinger and R. Silverstone (eds) International Media Research: A Critical Survey, pp. 65-95. London : Routledge.
20.
Ilkkaracan, I. and Ilkkaracan P. ( 2003) Kuldan Yurttasa: Kadınlar Neresinde? (From Subjects to Citizens: Where Are Women?). Istanbul: Kadının Insan Hakları- Yeni Çözümler .
21.
Inal, A. ( 1994-5) ‘Bir Izleyici Gozuyle Siyaset Meydani (Arena of Politics from a Viewer’s Perspective)’, Birikim68-9: 65-75.
22.
Kahraman, H.B. ( 2000) ‘Je est un Autre: Turkish Literature in Transition between National and Global Self’, in M. Yasin (ed.) Stepmother Tongue: From Nationalism to Multiculturalism: Literatures of Cyprus, Greece, and Turkey, pp. 34-48. London: Middlesex University Press.
23.
Karpat, K.H. ( 1976) The Gecekondu: Rural Migration and Urbanization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Keane, J. ( 1991) The Media and Democracy. Cambridge : Polity.
25.
Keyman, F. ( 1995) ‘On the Relation between Global Modernity and Nationalism: The Crisis of Hegemony and the Rise of (Islamic) Identity in Turkey’ , New Perspectives on Turkey3(Fall): 93-120.
26.
Lara, M.P. ( 1998), Moral Textures: Feminist Narratives in the Public Sphere . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
27.
Livingstone, S. and Lunt, P. ( 1994) Talk on Television: Audience Participation and Public Debate. London: Routledge.
28.
Miller, T. ( 2007) Cultural Citizenship: Cosmopolitanism, Consumerism, and Television in a Neoliberal Age. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Pres.
29.
Nisbet, R. ( 1994) ‘Citizenship: Two Traditions’, in B. S. Turner and P. Hamilton (eds) Citizenship: Critical Concepts, Volume I, pp. 7-23. London: Routledge .
30.
Özyegin, G. ( 2001) Untidy Gender: Domestic Service in Turkey. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
31.
Peters, J.D. ( 1993) ‘Distrust of Representation: Habermas on the Public Sphere’, Media, Culture and Society5(4): 541-72.
32.
Poniewozik, J. ( 2008) ‘The View, The Proud’, Time , 6 October.
33.
Sahin, H. ( 1999) ‘Translator’s Preface to the Third Edition’ , in J. Keane (ed.) Medya ve demokrasi (Media and Democracy), pp. 9-21. Istanbul: Ayrinti.
34.
Saktanber, A. ( 1995) ‘Women in the Media in Turkey’, in S. Tekeli (ed.) Women in Modern Turkish Society , pp. 153-69. London: Zed Books.
35.
Sanli, S. ( 2005) ‘Veiling as Identity Politics: The Case of Turkey’ , Discourse of Sociological Practice7: 295-308.
36.
Stevenson, N. ( 2003) Cultural Citizenship: Cosmopolitan Questions. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
37.
Van Zoonen, L., Muller, F.Alinead, D., Dekker, M.Duits, L., van Romondt Vis, P. and Wittenberg, W. ( 2007) ‘Dr. Phil Meets the Candidates: How Family Life and Personal Experience Produce Political Discussions’, Critical Studies in Media Communication24: 322-38.
38.
White, J. ( 2002) Islamist Mobilization in Turkey: A Study in Vernacular Politics. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.
39.
WWHR-New Ways (2005) Turkish Civil and Penal Code Reforms from a Gender Perspective: The Sucess of two Nationwide Campaigns. Istanbul: Women for Women’s Human Rights.
40.
Young, I.M. ( 1996) ‘Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy’, in S. Benhabib (ed.) Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, pp. 120-35. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
