This article welcomes Born’s proposal that the sociology of art learn from ‘adjacent fields’ that can ‘augment the sociological repertoire’. It agrees especially that sociologists can learn much from the anthropology of art and material culture studies. However, it challenges Born’s claim that the sociology of art has ‘seen little progress in recent years’ and thus questions certain aspects of her proposal for a ‘post-Bourdieuian theory of cultural production’. The central argument is: rather than an ‘analytics of mediation’ — which Born recommends — the sociology of art can benefit from studying material ‘mediators’ at work in concrete artistic networks, and the role of aesthetic agency and art in the constitution of social life more generally. The ar ticle concludes that the path forward for a sociology of art may lie precisely in not trying to force a reconciliation between macro and micro approaches, or between humanities and social science perspectives.
Becker, H.S., Faulkner, R.R. and Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. ( 2006) ‘Editors’ Introduction’, in H.S. Becker et al. (eds), Art from Start to Finish: Jazz, Painting, and Other Improvisations, pp. 1-20. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Born, G. ( 1995) Rationalizing Culture: IRCAM, Boulez, and the Institutionalization of the Musical Avant-Garde. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
8.
Born, G. ( 2005) Uncertain Vision: Birt, Dyke and the Reinvention of the BBC. London: Vintage.
9.
Born, G. ( 2010) ‘The Social and the Aesthetic: For a Post-Bourdieuian Theory of Cultural Production’, Cultural Sociology4(2).
10.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste . Translated by R. Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1996) The Rules of Art. Cambridge: Polity.
12.
Braun, C. ( 1994) ‘The "Science of Reality" of Music History: On the Historical Background to Max Weber’s Study of Music’, in S. Whimster (ed.), Max Weber and the Culture of Anarchy, pp. 176-95. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
Caves, R. ( 2002) Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and Commerce . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
De La Fuente, E. ( 2007a) ‘The Place of Culture in Sociology: Romanticism and Debates about the "Cultural Turn"’, Journal of Sociology43(2): 115-30.
15.
De La Fuente, E. ( 2007b) ‘The "New Sociology of Art": Putting Art Back into Social Science Approaches to the Arts’, Cultural Sociology1(3): 409-25.
16.
DeNora, T. ( 1995) Beethoven and the Construction of Genius. Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
17.
DeNora, T. ( 2000) Music and Everyday Life. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
18.
DeNora, T. ( 2003) After Adorno: Rethinking Music Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Freedberg, D. ( 1989) The Power of Images. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Gell, A. ( 1998) Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
21.
Gilmore, S. ( 1988) ‘Schools of Activity and Innovation’, Sociological Quarterly29(2): 203-19.
22.
Gombart, E. and Hennion, A. ( 1999) ‘A Sociology of Attachment: Music Amateurs, Drug Users’, in J. Law and J. Hazzard (eds), Actor-Network Theory and After, pp. 220-47. Oxford: Blackwell .
23.
Hennion, A. ( 1993) La Passion Musicale. Paris: Métailié.
24.
Latour, B. ( 2007) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
25.
Miller, D. ( 2005) ‘Materiality: An Introduction’, in D. Miller (ed.), Materiality, pp. 1-50. London : Duke University Press.
Molotch, H. ( 2003) Where Stuff Comes From: How Toasters, Toilets, Computers, and Many Other Things Come to Be as They Are. New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
Molotch, H. ( 2004) ‘How Art Works: Form and Function in the Stuff of Life’, in R. Friedland and J. Mohr (eds), Matters of Culture: Cultural Sociology in Practice, pp. 341-77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Myers, F. ( 2002) Painting Culture: The Making of an Aboriginal High Art . London: Duke University Press .
30.
Tanner, J. ( 2003) ‘Introduction: Sociology and Art History’ , in J. Tanner (ed.), The Sociology of Art: A Reader, pp. 1-26. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
Tanner, J. and Osborne, R. ( 2006) ‘Introduction: Art and Agency and Art History’ , in J. Tanner and R. Osborne (eds), Art’s Agency and Art History, pp. 1-27. Oxford: Blackwell.
32.
Thomas, N. ( 1998) ‘Foreword’, in A. Gell, Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory of Art, pp. vii-xiii. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
33.
Throsby, D. ( 2000) Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Weber, M. ( 1958) The Rational and Social Foundations of Music. Translated by D. Martindale, G. Neuwirth and J. Riedel. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
35.
Weber, M. ( 1978) ‘Value-Judgments in Social Science’, in W.G. Runciman (ed.), Weber: Selections in Translation, pp. 69-98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Witkin, R.W. ( 1992) ‘Van Eyck through the Looking Glass’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour22(3): 329-50.
37.
Witkin, R.W. ( 1997) ‘Constructing a Sociology for an Icon of Aesthetic Modernity: Olympia Revisited’, Sociological Theory15(2): 101-25.
38.
Witkin, R.W. ( 1998) Adorno on Music. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
Witkin, R.W. ( 2009) ‘The Aesthetic Imperative of a Rational-Technical Mastery: A Study in Organizational Control through the Design of Artifacts’ , Music and Arts in Action2(1): 56-68.
40.
Wolff, J. ( 1981) The Social Production of Art. London : Macmillan.
41.
Wolff, J. ( 1983) Aesthetics and the Sociology of Art. London: George Allen and Unwin.
42.
Wolff, J. ( 2003) AngloModern: Painting and Modernity in Britain and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
43.
Wolff, J. ( 2008) The Aesthetics of Uncertainty. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
