Abstract
In their formulation of a `strong program' in cultural sociology, Jeffrey C.Alexander and Philip Smith argue that sociology is suffering from a `numbness toward meaning' due to `cultural unmusical scholars'. Clifford Geertz embodied this demanded musicality on, in Geertz's own words, `particular ways of being in the world'. He knew how to do a cultural sociology of symbolic structures, meaning making and performances, but did not found a school and had no party line. He even came to reject theory, which in the mid-1980s forced Alexander to conclude that `we must reluctantly turn away from Geertz'.The aim of this article is to reconcile Geertz with Alexander and the`strong program'. While Alexander rightly criticized Geertz from his turn away from theory, Alexander, at the very same time, missed out on the multidimensional cultural analysis that Geertz kept on doing so well. This is what is being demonstrated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
