This article investigates how Turkish audiences conceptualize authenticity in their engagement with foreign television (TV) productions in the case of Danish TV dramas. The theoretical notion of authenticity is juxtaposed with empirical material from fieldwork interactions, focus group interviews, and one-on-one interviews conducted with Turkish audiences between 2016 and 2018. By employing a semiotic analysis of fieldwork data, I argue that Turkish audiences attribute authenticity to the Danish TV drama series according to a socially created modality (truth value of a sign). This article draws on accounts about modality markers in TV drama series such as authentic portrayals of Danish TV characters and plausible-realistic depictions as a verisimilitudinous representation of everyday life. In the context of cross-cultural television viewing practices, the way Turkish audiences attribute meaning to Danish TV series in terms of authenticity, realism, and modality reveals a distinct differentiation between Danish TV dramas and other nationally and globally circulating media products.
AngI (2007) Television fictions around the world: melodrama and irony in global perspective. Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies2(2): 18–30. doi: 10.7227/CST.2.2.4.
2.
AngI (1985) Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination. London: Methuen.
3.
BignellJ (2016) Authenticity and performance of class in British factual TV series. In: CloarecNHaigronDLetortD (eds) Social Class on British and American Screens: Essays on Cinema and Television. Jefferson, USA: McFarland, pp. 58–73.
4.
BondenjergIRedvallENHellesR, et al. (2017) Transnational European Television Drama: Production, Genres, and Audiences. Cham, Swithzerland: Springer International Publishing.
5.
Borgen (2010-2013) DR 1. DR.
6.
Bron/Broen (2011-2018) DR1 and SVT 1. The Bridge. Filmlance/Nimbus Film for SVT/DR.
7.
ChandlerD (2002) Semiotics: The Basics. London: Routledge.
8.
Dallas (1978–1991). CBS. CA, USA: Lorimar.
9.
DorrA (1983) No shortcuts to judging reality. In: BryantJAndersonR (eds) Children’s Understanding of Television: Research on Attention and Comprehension. New York: Academic Press, 199–220.
EichnerS (2017) The ‘public presence’ of Danish film and television: the circulation of discourse between cultural journalism and audiences. Paper presented at the conference. In: International Communication Association Conference, San Diego, 26 May 2017.
12.
EnliG (2015) Mediated Authenticity: How the Media Constructs Reality. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
13.
EsserA (2020) The appeal of ‘authenticity’: Danish television series and their British audiences. In: JensenPMJacobsenUC (eds) The Global Audiences of Danish Television Drama. Gothenburg: Nordicom, 39–56.
14.
EsserA (2017) Form, platform and the formation of transnational audiences. Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies, 12: 411–429. DOI: 10.1177/1749602017729649.
15.
Forbrydelsen (2007–2012) [The killing] DR1. DR.
16.
Game of Thrones (2011–2019) HBO. Television 360/Grok! Productions/Generation Entertainment/Startling Television/Bighead Littlehead/Warner Bros. Television Distribution
17.
HallA (2009) Perceptions of the authenticity of reality programs and their relationships to audience involvement, enjoyment, and perceived learning. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media53(4): 515–531.
18.
HallA (2003) Reading realism: audiences’ evaluations of the reality of media texts. Journal of Communication53: 624–641.
19.
HansenKTWaadeAM (2017) Locating Nordic Noir: From Beck to the Bridge. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
HeramY (2019) ‘Too Good to Be True’: How Argentinian Audiences Read Danish TV Drama Series. Nordics.info. Denmark: Aarhus University. Available at:http://nordics.info/nordic-noir/.
21.
HillA (2005) Reality TV: Audiences and Popular Factual Television. London: Routledge.
22.
HillA (2018) Media Experiences: Engaging with Drama and Reality Television. London: Routledge.
23.
House of Cards (2013-2018). Netflix. USA: Media Rights Capital.
24.
JacobsenUCJensenPM (2020) Unfolding the global travel of Danish television drama series. In: JensenPMJacobsenUC (eds) The Global Audiences of Danish Television Drama. Gothenburg: Nordicom, 9–19.
25.
JacobsenUCMeleiroA (2020) Brazilian encounters: buyers and bloggers appropriating content. In: JensenPMJacobsenUC (eds) The Global Audiences of Danish Television Drama. Gothenburg: Nordicom, 57–74.
26.
JacobsenUC (2018) Does subtitled television drama brand the nation? Danish television drama and its language(s) in Japan. European Journal of Cultural Studies21: 614–630. DOI: 10.1177/1367549417751150.
27.
JensenPMJacobsenUC (eds) (2020) The Global Audiences of Danish Television Drama. Gothenburg: Nordicom.
28.
JensenPMJacobsenUC (2017a) Danish TV drama. Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies12(4): 325–330. DOI: 10.1177/1749602017733562.
29.
JensenPMJacobsenUC (2017b) The ‘three-leaf clover’: a methodological lens to understand transnational audiences. Critical Studies in Television12(4): 430–444.
30.
JensenPMMcCutcheonM (2020) ‘Othering the self and same-ing the other’: Australians watching nordic noir. In: JensenPMJacobsenUC (eds) The Global Audiences of Danish Television Drama. Gothenburg: Nordicom, 21–37.
31.
KaptanY (2020) Sensing authenticity, seeing aura: Turkish audiences’ reception of Danish dramas. In: JensenPMJacobsenUC (eds) The Global Audiences of Danish Television Drama. Gothenburg:Nordicom, 91–106.
32.
KaptanY (2018a) Multiple proximities and national identities: Turkish audiences’ perception of advertising adaptations. Popular Communication17: 18–34.
33.
KaptanY (2018b) A crime drama between fidelity and cultural specificity. In: PeacockSTurnbullSHansenKT (eds) European Television Crime Drama and Beyond. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 193–210.
34.
KarrebækMSStæhrAVarisP (2015) Punjabi at heart: language, legitimacy, and authenticity on social media. Discourse, Context and Media, 8(1): 20–29.
35.
KatzELiebesT (1990) Interacting with ‘Dallas’: cross cultural readings of American TV. Canadian Journal of Communication, 15(1): 45–66.
36.
KraidyM (2009) Reality television, gender, and authenticity in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Communication59: 345–366.
37.
Kleinecke-BatesI (2014) Victorians on Screen: The Nineteenth Century on British Television, 1994-2005. New York, NY: Palgrave McMillian.
38.
KöstlbauerJ (2013) The strange attraction of simulation: realism, authenticity, virtuality. In: KapellMWElliottAB (eds) Playing with the Past: Digital games and the Simulation of History. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 169–184.
39.
KressGVan LeeuwenT (2006) Reading Iimages. The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
40.
MaagaardCA (2015) Modality. In: NørgaardN (ed) Key Terms in Multimodality: Definitions, Issues, Discussions. Denmark: University of Southern Denmark. Available at:www.sdu.dk/multimodalkeyterms
41.
MarcusBWeigeltOHergertJ, et al. (2017) The use of snowball sampling for multi source organizational research: Some cause for concern. Personnel Psychology70: 635–673.
42.
McCabeJ (2020) Why the world fell for Borgen: legitimizing (trans)national public service broadcasting culture in the age of globalization. In: WaadeARedvallEJensenPM (eds) Danish Television Drama. Palgrave European Film and Media Studies. Cham: Plagrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-40798-8_3.
43.
McHughK (2018) The female detective, neurodiversity, and felt knowledge in engrenages and Bron/Broen. 19. Television and New Media, 19(6): 535–552.
44.
PinedoI (2019) The killing: the gender politics of the Nordic Noir crime drama and its American Remake. Television & New Media. 22: 2021. DOI: 10.1177/1527476419875572.
45.
SparreKFromU (2017) Journalists as tastemakers: an analysis of the coverage of the TV series Borgen in a British, Swedish and Danish Newsbrand. In: Nørgaard-KristensenNRiegertK (eds) Cultural Journalism in the Nordic Countries. Gothenburg: Nordicom, 159–178.
TomaselliKG (2001) The semiotics of anthropological authenticity: the film apparatus and cultural accommodation. Visual Anthropology14(2): 173–183.
48.
Van LeeuwenT (2001) What is authenticity?Discourse Studies3: 392–397.
49.
Van LeeuwenT (2005) Introducing Social Semiotics. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
50.
ZwaanKDe BruinJ (eds) (2012) Adapting Idols: Authenticity, Identity and Performance in a Global Television Format. Farnham, UK and Burlington, USA: Ashgate.
