Abstract
Rehabilitation often sits in a familiar tension between administrative efficiency and substantive change. Using a case from China—where ideological education is highly standardized, documented, and linked to incentives—this article makes the mechanisms behind that tension especially legible. Based on fieldwork in a South China prison, it shows that reform is organized around what can be documented and verified. It then traces three arenas where inner change meets paperwork: emotional narratives, legal consciousness, and perceptions of sentencing. Emotional expression, though valued in rhetoric, is mainly taken up when it signals compliance. Legal consciousness is treated as a key sign of moral transformation, yet is shaped with limited reference to everyday social experience. Views about sentencing reveal gaps between institutional logic and people’s sense of proportion and fairness. Together, the analysis shows how rehabilitation can look effective on record while resonating unevenly with lived realities, thereby identifying standardization, documentation, and incentive coupling as mid-level mechanisms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
