Relapse is an integral part of substance use recovery, yet research on minimizing relapse is limited. Routine Activity Theory posits that when offenders and targets meet where guardians are absent, crime will occur. Conceptualizing relapse in terms of Routine Activity Theory, such that the offender is a person in recovery, the target is the drug, and a guardian is involved in the person’s recovery, offers a new perspective on relapse. Examples are provided from qualitative interviews with 29 women formerly involved in substance use and street prostitution. Respondents described relapse as an opportunity, suggesting the application of Routine Activity Theory. Women spoke about the role of intimate handlers, place managers and guardians in preventing or facilitating relapse, and how different types of places create opportunities for relapse. Results indicate the importance of controllers, in particular intimate handlers, in minimizing relapse opportunities. Interventions by informal social control agents informed by Routine Activity Theory may prevent relapse opportunities from materializing.
AnderssonHWWenaasMNordfjærnT (2019) Relapse after inpatient SU treatment: A prospective cohort study among users of illicit substances. Addictive Behaviors90: 222–228.
2.
BrophyHDysonMRittenbachK (2023) Concept analysis of recovery from SU. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing32: 117–127.
3.
CohenLEFelsonM (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review44(4): 588–608.
4.
CusickLBrooks-GordonBCampbellR, et al. (2011) “Exiting” drug use and sex work: Career paths, interventions and government strategy targets. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy18(2): 145–156.
5.
EckJE (1994) Drug Markets and Drug Places: A Case-Control Study of the Spatial Structure of Illicit Drug Dealing. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
6.
EddieDBergmanBGHoffmanLA, et al. (2021) Abstinence versus moderation recovery pathways following resolution of a SU problem: Prevalence, predictors, and relationship to psychosocial well-being in a U.S. national sample. Alcoholism: Clinical Experimental Research46: 312–325.
7.
FairbanksRP (2009) How It Works: Recovering Citizens in Post-Welfare Philadelphia. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
8.
FelsonM (1995) Those who discourage crime. Crime and Place4: 53–66.
9.
FelsonM (2008) Routine activity approach. In:WortleyRMazerolleL (eds) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis. London: Willan Publishing, pp. 70–77.
10.
GesserN (2021) “Global I just wanna give myself a chance”: a qualitatively-informed simulation model of disengagement from street prostitution. Doctoral Dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
11.
GesserN (2022) “[Peers give] you hope that you can change too”: Peers’ helping relationships for women exiting street-based sex trade. Ethics and Social Welfare16(2): 151–168.
12.
GorskiTT (1990) The Cenaps model of relapse prevention: Basic principles and procedures. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs22(2): 125–133.
13.
HayesBEO’NealENHernandezCN (2021) The sexual victimization of college students: A test of routine activity theory. Crime & Delinquency67(12): 2043–2068.
14.
HollisMEFelsonMWelshBC (2013) The capable guardian in routine activities theory: A theoretical and conceptual reappraisal. Crime Prevention and Community Safety15(1): 65–79.
15.
LaudetAB (2008) The road to recovery: Where are we going and how do we get there? Empirically driven conclusions and future directions for service development and research. SU and Misuse43(12–13): 2001–2020.
16.
LinKWuYSunIY, et al. (2023) Telecommunication and cyber fraud victimization among Chinese college students: An application of routine activity theory. Criminology & Criminal Justice. Epub ahead of print 4 January. DOI: 10.1177/17488958221146144.
17.
MadensenTDEckJE (2008) Violence in bars: Exploring the impact of place manager decision-making. Crime Prevention and Community Safety10(2): 111–125.
18.
MaistoSAHallgrenKARoosCR, et al. (2018) Course of remission from and relapse to heavy drinking following outpatient treatment of alcohol use disorder. Drug and Alcohol Dependence187: 319–326.
19.
MaistoSAWitkiewitzKMoskalD, et al. (2016) Is the construct of relapse heuristic, and does it advance alcohol use disorder clinical practice?Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs77(6): 849–858.
20.
MatthewsREastonHYoungL, et al. (2014) Exiting Prostitution. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
McElrathKChitwoodDDComerfordM (1997) Crime victimization among injection drug users. Journal of Drug Issues27(4): 771–783.
22.
MillerHVMillerMBarnesJC (2016) Reentry programming for opioid and opiate involved female offenders: Findings from a mixed methods evaluation. Journal of Criminal Justice46: 129–136.
23.
MoeFDMoltuCMcKayJR, et al. (2022) Is the relapse concept in studies of SUDs a “one size fits all” concept? A systematic review of relapse operationalisations. Drug and Alcohol Review41(4): 743–758.
24.
MoonSJELeeH (2020) Relapse to SU: A concept analysis. Nursing Forum55(3): 523–530.
NäsiMRäsänenPKaakinenM, et al. (2017) Do routine activities help predict young adults’ online harassment: A multi-nation study. Criminology & Criminal Justice17(4): 418–432.
27.
NgaiCKWuCSSuenLK (2020) Structured relapse prevention program for Chinese patients in Hong Kong with comorbidity of SU and mental health disorders: A feasibility study. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs52(1): 56–65.
28.
PaquetteCEDaughersSBWitkiewitzK (2022) Expanding the continuum of substance use disorder treatment: Non abstinence approaches. Clinical Psychology Review91: 102110.
29.
PrattTCCullenFT (2005) Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta-analysis. Crime and Justice32: 373–450.
30.
ReynaldD (2009) Guardianship in action: Developing a new tool for measurement. Crime Prevention and Community Safety11: 1–20.
31.
ReynsBWHensonBFisherBS (2011) Being pursued online: Applying cyberlifestyle–routine activities theory to cyberstalking victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior38(11): 1149–1169.
32.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration (SAMHSA) (2012) SAMHSA’s working definition of recovery. Available at: http://www.samhsa.gov/recovery (accessed 10 October 2017).
33.
SampsonREckJDunhamJ (2010) Super controllers and crime prevention: A routine activity explanation of crime prevention success and failure. Security Journal23: 37–51.
34.
SchaeferLLittleS (2020) A quasi-experimental evaluation of the “environmental corrections” model of probation and parole. Journal of Experimental Criminology16: 535–555.
35.
SchaeferLMoirEWilliamsGC (2019) When a loved one is on community supervision: The crime controller strategies used by “PoPPs” (parents/partners/peers of probationers and parolees). Criminal Justice Studies32(2): 81–98.
36.
SteinmetzKF (2025) Routine Activities Theory? A kindly critique and a pathway forward. Victims & Offenders20(5–6): 798–813.
37.
TracySJ (2020) Qualitative Research Methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
38.
WeisburdDEckJEBragaAA, et al. (2016) Place Matters: Criminology for the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
WitkiewitzKMarlattGA (2007) Modeling the complexity of post-treatment drinking: It’s a rocky road to relapse. Clinical Psychology Review27(6): 724–738.
40.
XieHMcHugoGJFoxMB, et al. (2005) Special section on relapse prevention: Substance abuse relapse in a ten-year prospective follow-up of clients with mental and SUDs. Psychiatric Services56(10): 1282–1287.
41.
ZimmermanCA (2007) Routine activity theory and the handling of children and policy makers. Criminology and Public Policy6: 327.
