Translational criminology emerged from the evidence-based criminology movement, which relies on rigorous research to amass scientific evidence about how to improve fairness and effectiveness in criminal justice. While evidence-based criminology focuses primarily on developing scientific evidence about which programs, practices, and interventions are most effective, translational criminology is concerned with how to disseminate that knowledge to those practitioners and policy makers who can use it most. Moreover, it is concerned with ensuring that those practitioners and policy makers understand the evidence and know what to do with it. In this paper, we introduce theories and concepts from the study of intergroup communication and accommodation and illustrate their utility for understanding and improving translational criminology and related efforts to translate science into policy and practice.
AllportGW (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
AlpertGPRojekJHansenJA (2013) Building Bridges between Police Researchers and Practitioners: Agents of Change in a Complex World. U.S. Department of Justice. Available at: https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/244345.pdf
3.
BallietDWuJDe DreuCKW (2014) Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin140(6): 1556–1581.
4.
BarlowMWatsonBJonesE, et al. (2023) The influence of professional identity on how the receiver receives and responds to a speaking up message: A cross-sectional study. BMC Nursing22: 26.
5.
BaronJ (2018) A brief history of evidence-based policy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science678(1): 40–50.
6.
BlombergTGCoppJETuranovicJJ (2023) Challenges and prospects for evidence-informed policy in criminology. Annual Review of Criminology7: 143–162.
7.
BoteinB (1965) Manhattan Bail Project: Its impact on criminology and the criminal law processes. Texas Law Review43: 319–331.
8.
BragaAADavisEF (2014) Implementing science in police agencies: The embedded research model. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice8(4): 294–306.
9.
CairneyP (2016) The Politics of Evidence-based Policy Making. New York: Springer.
10.
ChoiCWGilesH (2012) Intergroup messages in policing the community. In: GilesH (ed.) The Handbook of Intergroup Communication. London: Routledge, pp. 264–277.
CouplandNWiemannJMGilesH (1991) Talk as “problem” and communication as “miscommunication”: An integrative analysis. In: CouplandNGilesHWiemannJM (eds) “Miscommunication” and Problematic Talk. New York: Sage, pp. 1–17.
13.
CroftonJ (2006) The MRC randomized trial of streptomycin and its legacy: A view from the clinical front line. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine99(10): 531–534.
14.
DeTurkS (2006) The power of dialogue: Consequences of intergroup dialogue and their implications for agency and alliance building. Communication Quarterly54(1): 33–51.
15.
DopsonSLocockLGabbayJ, et al. (2003) Evidence-based medicine and the implementation gap. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine7(3): 311–330.
16.
DragojevicMGilesH (2014) Language and interpersonal communication: Their intergroup dynamics. In: BergerCR (ed.) Handbook of Interpersonal Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 29–51.
17.
DragojevicMGasiorekJGilesH (2015) Communication accommodation theory. In: BergerCRRoloffME (eds) Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication, vol. 1. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 176–196.
18.
DuncanWJ (1980) Knowledge transfer in administrative science. Public Administration Review40(4): 341–349.
19.
EcclesMPMittmanBS (2006) Welcome to implementation science. Implementation Science1(1): 1–3.
20.
GaertnerSLDovidioJF (2014) Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. London: Routledge.
21.
GaertnerSLDovidioJFBachmanA (1996) Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations20(3-4): 271–290.
22.
GalloisCWatsonBMGilesH (2018) Intergroup communication: Identities and effective interactions. Journal of Communication68(2): 309–317.
23.
GauchatG (2015) The political context of science in the United States: Public acceptance of evidence-based policy and science funding. Social Forces94(2): 723–746.
GilesH (1978) Linguistic differentiation between ethnic groups. In: TajfelH (ed.) Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, pp. 361–393.
26.
GilesH (1979) Ethnicity markers in speech. In: SchererKRGilesH (eds) Social Markers in Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 251–289.
27.
GilesH (2008) Accommodating translational research. Journal of Applied Communication Research36(2): 121–127.
28.
GilesH (2016) The social origins of CAT. In: GilesH (ed.) Communication Accommodation Theory: Negotiating Personal and Social Identities across Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–12.
29.
GilesHHarwoodJ (eds) (2018) The Oxford Encyclopedia of Intergroup Communication (Vols. 1 & 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
GilesHMaassA (eds) (2016) Advances in Intergroup Communication. Lausanne: Peter Lang.
31.
GilesHBourhisRYTaylorDM (1977) Toward a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In: GilesH (ed.) Language and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, pp. 307–348.
32.
GilesHEdwardsALWaltherJB (2023) Communication Accommodation Theory: Past accomplishments, current trends, and future prospects. Language Sciences99: 1–16.
33.
GilesHMaguireERHillSL (2024) Policing at the crossroads: An intergroup communication accommodation perspective. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations27(5): 1107–1127.
34.
GilesHMaguireERHillSL (Eds) (2021) The Rowman and Littlefield Handbook of Policing, Communication, and Society. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
35.
GilesHWillemynsMGalloisC, et al. (2007) Accommodating a new frontier: The context of law enforcement. In: FiedlerK (ed.) Social Communication. Hove: Psychology Press, pp. 129–162.
36.
GrayJMSchnadowerDLaFolletteR, et al. (2022) Going viral: A scoping review of the current state and impact of online research dissemination in emergency medicine. AEM Education and Training: A Global Journal of Emergency Care6(1): 1–11.
37.
HaggertyKD (2004) Displaced expertise: Three constraints on the policy-relevance of criminological thought. Theoretical Criminology8(2): 211–231.
38.
HallP (2005) Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers. Journal of Interprofessional Care19(Suppl. 1): 188–196.
39.
HewettDGWatsonBMGalloisC, et al. (2009) Intergroup communication between hospital doctors: Implications for quality of patient care. Social Science & Medicine69(12): 1732–1740.
40.
HewstoneMGilesH (1986) Social groups and social stereotypes in intergroup communication: Review and model of intergroup communication breakdown. In:GudykunstWB (ed.) Intergroup Communication. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 10–26.
41.
HewstoneMRubinMWillisH (2002) Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology53: 575–604.
42.
HoggMAReidSA (2006) Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory16(1): 7–30.
Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
45.
ItalianoRRamirezFChattopadhyayS (2021) Perceptions of police use of force among U.S. adults and the role of communication accommodation in improving police-civilian interactions. Journal of Applied Communication Research49(6): 669–686.
46.
KienzleJSolizJ (2017) Intergroup communication. In: ChenL (ed.) Handbook of Intercultural Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 369–388.
47.
KoschmannMA (2013) The communicative constitution of collective identity in inter-organizational collaboration. Management Communication Quarterly27(1): 61–89.
48.
LahtiMValoM (2018) Intercultural workplace communication. In: GilesHHarwoodJ (eds) The Oxford Encyclopedia of Intergroup Communication, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 635–654.
LaubJRFrischNE (2016) Translational criminology: A new path forward. In: BlombergTGBrancaleJMBeaverKM, et al (eds) Advancing Criminology and Criminal Justice Policy. London: Routledge, pp. 52–62.
51.
MaassACastelliLArcuriL (2000) Measuring prejudice: Implicit versus explicit techniques. In: CapozzaDBrownR (eds) Social identity processes: Trends in theory and research. New York: Sage, pp. 96–116.
52.
McCordJ (2003) Cures that harm: Unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science587: 16–30.
53.
MacKenzieDL (2000) Evidence-based corrections: Identifying what works. Crime and Delinquency46(4): 457–471.
54.
MacKenzieDLPiqueroA (1994) The impact of shock incarceration programs on prison crowding. Crime & Delinquency40(2): 222–249.
55.
McNeillFFarrallSLightowlerC, et al. (2012) Reexamining evidence-based practice in community corrections: Beyond “A-Confined View” of what works. Justice Research and Policy14(1): 35–60.
56.
MaguireER (2021) The role of communication reform in community policing. In: GilesHMaguireERHillSL (eds) The Rowman & Littlefield Handbook of Policing, Communication, and Society. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 153–172.
57.
MarksHM (2011) The 1954 Salk poliomyelitis vaccine field trial. Clinical Trials8(2): 224–234.
58.
MarloweDW (2011) Evidence-based sentencing for drug offenders. The Prison Journal91(3): 27S–47S.
59.
MartinsonR (1974) What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest10: 22–54.
MearsDP (2007) Towards rational and evidence-based crime policy. Journal of Criminal Justice35(6): 667–682.
63.
MorrisZSWoodingSGrantJ (2011) The answer is 17 years, what is the question: Understanding time lags in translational research. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine104(12): 510–520.
64.
MoscatelliSHewstoneMRubiniM (2017) Different size, different language? Linguistic ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation by majority and minority groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations20(6): 757–769.
65.
National Research Council (2005) Improving Evaluation of Anticrime Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
66.
National Research Council (2012) Using Science as Evidence in Public Policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
67.
NeyroudPWeisburdD (2023) Re-inventing policing: Using science to transform policing. In: WeisburdDJonathan-ZamirTPerryG, et al (eds) The Future of Evidence-based Policing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 44–63.
68.
NicholsJWireSWuX, et al. (2019) Translational criminology and its importance in policing: A review. Police Practice and Research20(6): 537–551.
69.
OakleyA (1998) Experimentation and social interventions: A forgotten but important history. British Medical Journal317(7167): 1239–1242.
70.
OliverKInnvarSLorencT, et al. (2014) A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Services Research14: 2.
71.
PalomaresNAGilesHSolizJ, et al. (2016) Intergroup accommodation, social categories, and identities. In: GilesH (ed.) Communication Accommodation Theory: Negotiating Personal Relationships and Social Identities across Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 123–151.
72.
PestaGBBlombergTGRamosJ, et al. (2019) Translational criminology: Towards best practice. American Journal of Criminal Justice44: 499–518.
73.
PetersiliaJ (1991) Policy relevance and the future of criminology —The American Society of Criminology 1990 presidential address. Criminology29(1): 1–15.
74.
PetersiliaJ (2008) Influencing public policy: An embedded criminologist reflects on California prison reform: The academy of experimental criminology 2007 Joan McCord Prize lecture. Journal of Experimental Criminology4: 335–356.
75.
PetronioS (2007a) JACR Commentaries on translating research into practice. Journal of Applied Communication Research35(3): 215–217.
76.
PetronioS (2007b) Translational research endeavors and the practices of communication privacy management. Journal of Applied Communication Research35(3): 218–222.
77.
PetrosinoAPetrosinoCTBuehlerJ (2004) “Scared Straight” and other juvenile awareness programs for preventing juvenile delinquency. Campbell Systematic Reviews1(1): 1–62.
78.
PettigrewTFTroppLR (2006) A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90(5): 751–783.
79.
RaynorP (2003) Evidence-based probation and its critics. Probation Journal50(4): 334–345.
80.
ReidSA (2012) Social psychological approaches to intergroup communication. In: GilesH (ed.) The Handbook of Intergroup Communication. London: Routledge, pp. 19–30.
81.
RobertsARobertsJM (2007) The structure of informal communication between police agencies. Policing: An International Journal30(1): 93–107.
82.
RubinMBadeaC (2007) Why do people perceive ingroup homogeneity on ingroup traits and outgroup homogeneity on outgroup traits?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin33(1): 31–42.
83.
SannöAÖbergAEFlores-GarciaE, et al. (2019) Increasing the impact of industry–academia collaboration through co-production. Technology Innovation Management Review9(4): 1232.
ShermanLW (2004) Research and policing: The infrastructure and political economy of federal funding. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science593(1): 156–178.
86.
ShermanLW (2005) The use and usefulness of criminology, 1751–2005: Enlightened justice and its failures. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science600(1): 115–135.
87.
ShermanLWFarringtonDPWelshBC, et al. (2002) Evidence-based Crime Prevention. London: Routledge.
88.
ShermanLWGottfredsonDMacKenzieDL, et al. (1997) Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising—A Report to the United States Congress. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
89.
SilvestriRBocconcelliRCarloniE, et al. (2022) Interorganizational R&D projects in clustering contexts: A resource interaction perspective. Journal of Business Research148: 343–355.
90.
SimonB (1992) The perception of ingroup and outgroup homogeneity: Reintroducing the intergroup context. European Review of Social Psychology3(1): 1–30.
91.
SimonBPettigrewTF (1990) Social identity and perceived group homogeneity: Evidence for the ingroup homogeneity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology20(4): 269–286.
92.
SkeemJLManchakS (2008) Back to the future: From Klockars’ model to effective supervision to evidence-based practice in probation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation47(3): 220–247.
93.
SkinnerALMeltzoffAN (2019) Childhood experiences and intergroup biases among children. Social Issues and Policy Review13(1): 211–240.
94.
SmithPHaslamSANielsenJF (2018) In search of identity leadership: An ethnographic study of emergent influence in an interorganizational R&D team. Organization Studies39(10): 1425–1447.
95.
SolizJ (2019) Intergroup processes and communication in personal relationships. In: WilsonSRSmithSW (eds) Reflections on Interpersonal Communication. Solano Beach, CA: Cognella, pp. 91–12.
96.
SpadaroGLiuJHZhangRJ, et al. (2024) Identity and institutions as foundations of ingroup favoritism: An investigation across 17 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science15(5): 592–602.
97.
StephensD (2023) Looking back on the challenges to evidence-based policing: A chief’s perspective. In: WeisburdDJonathan-ZamirTPerryG, et al (eds) The Future of Evidence-based Policing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 292–314.
98.
TajfelH (1974) Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information13(2): 65–93.
99.
TajfelH (1981) Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
100.
TajfelHTurnerJC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: AustinWGWorchelS (eds) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, pp. 33–47.
101.
TelepCW (2016) Expanding the scope of evidence-based policing. Criminology & Public Policy15(1): 243–252.
102.
ThomasGFZolinRHartmanJL (2009) The central role of communication in developing trust and its effect on employee involvement. The Journal of Business Communication46(3): 287–310.
103.
TurnerJCReynoldsKJ (2011) Self-categorization theory. In: LangePAMKruglanskiAWHigginsET (eds) Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. New York: Sage, pp. 399–417.
104.
TurnerJCHoggMAOakesPJ, et al. (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.
105.
TurnerJCOakesPJHaslamSA, et al. (1994) Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin20(5): 454–463.
106.
van ProoijenJ-WKrouwelAPMBoitenM, et al. (2015) Fear among the extremes: How political ideology predicts negative emotions and outgroup derogation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin41(4): 485–497.
107.
WarrenRK (2009) Evidence-based sentencing: The application of principles of evidence-based practice to state sentencing practice and policy. University of San Francisco Law Review43(3): 585–633.
108.
WatsonBM (2020) Communication accommodation theory as an intervention tool to improve interprofessional practice in healthcare. In: MullanyL (ed.) Professional Communication: Consultancy, Advocacy, Activism. New York: Springer, pp. 169–189.
109.
WatsonBMSolizJ (2018) Communication accommodation theory in institutional settings: Opportunities for applied research. In: HarwoodJGasiorekJPiersonH, et al (eds) Language, Communication, and Intergroup Relations: A Celebration of the Scholarship of Howard Giles. London: Routledge, pp. 242–264.
110.
WebbVKatzCMFlippinM (2020) Build police-researcher partnerships to advance policing. In: KatzCMMaguireER (eds) Transforming the Police: Thirteen Key Reforms. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, pp. 175–189.
111.
WeisburdD (2003) Ethical practice and evaluation of interventions in crime and justice: The moral imperative for randomized trials. Evaluation Review27(3): 336–354.
112.
WeisburdDLumCMPetrosinoA (2001) Does research design affect study outcomes in criminal justice?Annals of American Political and Social Science578(1): 50–70.
113.
WeissA (1997) The communication of innovation in American policing. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management20(2): 292–310.
114.
WeissCHMurphy-GrahamEPetrosinoA, et al. (2008) The fairy godmother—and her warts: Making the dream of evidence-based policy come true. American Journal of Evaluation29(1): 29–47.
115.
WelshBCFarringtonDP (2006) Evidence-based crime prevention. In: WelshBCFarringtonDP (eds) Preventing Crime: What Works for Children, Offenders, Victims, and Places. New York: Springer, pp. 1–20.
116.
WelshBCFarringtonDP (2011) Evidence-based crime policy. In: TonryM (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Crime and Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 60–92.
117.
ZaiserBStallerMS (2015) The word is sometimes mightier than the sword: Rethinking communication skills to enhance officer safety. Journal of Law Enforcement4(5): 1–17.
118.
ZhangYBImamuraM (2018) Communication accommodation theory and intergroup communication. In: GilesHHarwoodJ (eds) The Oxford Encyclopedia of Intergroup Communication, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 130–150.
119.
ZhangYBPittsM (2019) Interpersonal accommodation. In: HarwoodJGasiorekJPiersonH, et al. (eds) Language, Communication, and Intergroup Relations: A Celebration of the Scholarship of Howard Giles. London: Routledge, pp. 192–216.
