In some restorative justice schemes, facilitators have been found to control discussions and outcomes, influence the participation rights of offenders and victims and coax offenders into explanations of accountability. This study used audio-recordings of four restorative justice meetings that were transcribed and examined using the method of conversation analysis. I examined the questions asked by the facilitator, focusing on the role of epistemics in how the questions were constructed. Findings revealed a relationship between asking questions and having control, showing the significant role the facilitator played in shaping the restorative justice narrative through the question–answer framework. Offenders and victims were questioned differently by the facilitator, resulting in the talk of offenders being restricted and scrutinised.
BirkbeckCSmithG (2024) Moral work in victim-offender meetings. Criminology & Criminal Justice24(1): 59–79.
5.
BraithwaiteJ (2002) Setting standards for restorative justice. British Journal of Criminology42: 563–577.
6.
ClaymanSE (1990) From talk to text: Newspaper accounts of reporter-source interactions. Media, Culture and Society12(1): 79–103.
7.
ClaymanSEHeritageJ (2002) The News Interview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
CookKJ (2006) Doing difference and accountability in restorative justice conferences. Theoretical Criminology10(1): 107–124.
9.
DalyK (2002) Restorative justice: The real story. Punishment & Society4(1): 55–79.
10.
DignanJAtkinsonAAtkinsonH, et al. (2007) Staging restorative justice encounters against a criminal justice backdrop: A dramaturgical analysis. Criminology and Criminal Justice7(1): 5–32.
11.
DrewP (1992) Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In: DrewPHeritageJ (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 470–520.
12.
DrewP (2018) Epistemics in social interaction. Discourse Studies20(1): 163–187.
13.
EhrlichS (2001) Representing Rape: Language and Sexual Consent. London: Routledge.
14.
GerkinP (2009) Participation in victim-offender mediation: Lessons learned from observations. Criminal Justice Review34(2): 226–247.
HeritageJ (2003) Designing questions and setting agendas in the news interview. In: GlennPLeBaronCDMandelbaumJ (eds) In Studies in Language and Social Action: In Honor of Robert Hopper. New York: Routledge, pp. 57–90.
17.
HeritageJ (2012) Epistemics in action: Action formulation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction45(1): 1–29.
18.
HeritageJ (2013) Epistemics in conversation. In: SidnellJStiversT (eds) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell,pp. 370–394.
19.
HoyleCYoungRHillR (2002) Proceed with Caution: An Evaluation of the Thames Valley Police Initiative in Restorative Cautioning. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
20.
JeffersonG (1983) Two Explorations of the Organization of Overlapping Talk in Conversation. Tilburg: Tilburg University.
21.
JeffersonG (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: LernerGH (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–31.
22.
KomterM (2013) Conversation analysis in the courtroom. In: SidnellJStiversT (eds) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 612–629.
23.
McGlynnCWestmarlandNGoddenN (2012) ‘I just wanted him to hear me’: Sexual violence and the possibilities of restorative justice. Journal of Law and Society39(2): 213–240.
SacksH (1995) Lectures on Conversation Volumes I & II. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
26.
SchegloffEA (1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In: TannenD (ed.) Analysing Discourse: Text and Talk. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 71–93.
27.
ScottMBLymanM (1968) Accounts. American Sociological Review33(1): 46–62.
28.
ShaplandJAtkinsonAAtkinsonH, et al. (2006) Situating restorative justice within criminal justice. Theoretical Criminology10(4): 505–531.
29.
ShaplandJRobinsonGSorsbyA (2011) Restorative Justice in Practice: Evaluating What Works for Victims and Offenders. London and New York: Routledge.
30.
ten HaveP (2007) Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage.
31.
ThompsonMA (2017) Institutional argumentation and institutional rules: Effects of interactive asymmetry on argumentation in institutional contexts. Argumentation31: 1–21.
32.
ZappavignaMMartinJR (2018) Discourse and Diversionary Justice: An Analysis of Ceremonial Redress in Youth Justice Conferencing. London: Palgrave.
33.
ZernovaM (2007) Restorative Justice: Ideals and Realities. Aldershot: Gower.
