Discourses surrounding similar forms of transactional sex in the United States and Europe, Africa, and East Asia exemplify the ways that sexual transactions serve as affectively charged inflection points at which gendered, racialized, and classed forms of power collide. Deconstructing academic discourses and affective strategies surrounding sugar arrangements in the United States and Europe, blessed relationships in Africa, and compensated dating in East Asia uncovers the ways that cultural norms surrounding sex, gender, and money serve to uphold imperialist, patriarchal, racist hierarchies. Outlying examples of intersectional discourses provide a roadmap for challenging these dominant power structures in the academic literature.
BajajM (2009) Sugar daddies and the danger of sugar: Cross-generational relationships, HIV/AIDS, and secondary schooling in Zambia. In: BakerDWisemanA (eds) Gender, Equality and Education From International and Comparative Perspectives, vol. 10. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 123–143.
BernsteinE (2007) Temporarily Yours: Intimacy, Authenticity, and the Commerce of Sex. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
BirkásBMeskóNZsidóAN, et al. (2020) Providing sexual companionship for resources: Development, validation, and personality correlates of the Acceptance of Sugar Relationships in Young Women and Men Scale (ASR-YWMS). Frontiers in Psychology11: 1–15.
5.
BrooksS (2021) Innocent white victims and fallen black girls: Race, sex work, and the limits of anti–sex trafficking laws. Signs46(2): 513–521.
6.
BrouardPCreweM (2014) Sweetening the deal? Sugar daddies, sugar mummies, sugar babies and HIV in contemporary South Africa. Agenda26(4): 48–56.
7.
CheungCJiaXLiJC, et al. (2016) Engaging adolescent girls in transactional sex through compensated dating. Journal of Adolescence52: 124–134.
8.
ChuCSK (2018) Compensated Dating: Buying and Selling Sex in Cyberspace. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
ChuCSKLaidlerKJ (2016) Becoming a male client of compensated dating. Deviant Behavior37(1): 47–65.
10.
CollinsPH (2000) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
11.
CollinsPH (2004) Black Sexual Politics: African Americans, Gender, and the New Racism. New York: Routledge.
12.
CrenshawK (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum1989(1): 139–167.
13.
DahlB (2015) Sexy orphans and sugar daddies: The sexual and moral politics of aid for AIDS in Botswana. Studies in Comparative International Development50(4): 519–538.
14.
DanilLR (2020) Queerphobic immunopolitics in the case of HIV/AIDS: Political economy, the dark legacy of British colonialism, and queerphobia in sub-Saharan Africa. Sexuality & Culture25(2): 377–395.
15.
de Boer-BuquicchioM (2015) End of mission statement of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, Maud de Boer-Buquicchio, on her visit to Japan. United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, 26October. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=16656&LangID=E
16.
DeeksLE (2013) A website by any other name? Sex, sugar, and Section 230. Women’s Rights Law Reporter34(245): 244–281.
17.
DoezemaJ (2010) Sex Slaves and Discourse Masters: The Construction of Trafficking. London: Zed Books.
18.
EspirituYL (2008) Asian American Women and Men: Labor, Laws, and Love. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
19.
Fielding-MillerRDunkleKLJama-ShaiN, et al. (2016) The feminine ideal and transactional sex: Navigating respectability and risk in Swaziland. Social Science & Medicine158: 24–33.
20.
FlowersRB (2011) Prostitution in the Digital Age: Selling Sex From the Suite to the Street. Westport, CT: Praeger.
21.
FreedmanJPokuN (2005) The socioeconomic context of Africa’s vulnerability to HIV/AIDS. Review of International Studies31(4): 665–686.
22.
FrieslaarBVMasangoM (2021) Blessings or curses? The contribution of the blesser phenomenon to gender-based violence and intimate partner violence. Theological Studies77(4): 1–10.
23.
GlickPFiskeST (1996) The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology70(3): 491–512.
24.
GobindJDu PlessisG (2015) Sugar daddy: The student attraction. Gender and Behaviour13(2): 6720–6729.
25.
GunnarssonLStridS (2022) Chemistry or service? Sugar daddies’ (re)quest for mutuality within the confines of commercial exchange. Journal of Sex Research59(3): 309–320.
26.
GunnarssonLStridS (2023) Varieties of sugar dating in Sweden: Content, compensation, motivations. Social Problems70: 1044–1062.
27.
HarlingGNewellM-LTanserF, et al. (2014) Do age-disparate relationships drive HIV incidence in young women? Evidence from a population cohort in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes66(4): 443–451.
28.
HemmingsC (2011) Why Stories Matter: The Political Grammar of Feminist Theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
29.
HoJ (2003) From Spice Girls to enjo kosai: Formations of teenage girls’ sexualities in Taiwan. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies4(2): 325–336.
30.
HossJBloklandLME (2018) Sugar daddies and blessers: A contextual study of transactional sexual interactions among young girls and older men. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology28(5): 306–317.
31.
HunterM (2010) Love in the Time of AIDS: Inequality, Gender, and Rights in South Africa. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
32.
HwangMCParreñasRS (2021) The gendered racialization of Asian women as villainous temptresses. Gender and Society35(4): 567–576.
33.
IpolyiDCsányiELángA, et al. (2021) Attachment avoidance moderates the relationship among acceptance of sugar relationships, motivation, and self-esteem. Frontiers in Psychology12: 711199.
34.
KimE-S (2003) A culture that cultivates the prostitution of teenage women: Based on the experiences of prostitution among teenage women. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies4(2): 337–352.
35.
KinsellaS (2014) Schoolgirls, Money and Rebellion in Japan. New York: Routledge.
36.
KirkebyKMLehmillerJJMarksMJ (2022) Sugar dating, perceptions of power, and condom use: Comparing the sexual health risk behaviours of sugar dating to non-sugar dating women. Journal of Sex Research59(6): 731–741.
37.
Kuate-DefoB (2004) Young people’s relationships with sugar daddies and sugar mummies: What do we know and what do we need to know?African Journal of Reproductive Health8(2): 13–37.
LamO-W (2003) Why did enjo kosai anchor in Taiwan but not in Hong Kong? Or the convergence of “enjo” and “kosai” in teenage sex work. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies4(2): 353–363.
40.
LángABirkásBZsidóAN, et al. (2021) It takes two to tango: Development, validation, and personality correlates of the Acceptance of Sugar Relationships in Older Men and Women Scale (ASR-OMWS). Frontiers in Psychology12: 592138.
41.
Leclerc-MadlalaS (2008) Age-disparate and intergenerational sex in southern Africa: The dynamics of hypervulnerability. AIDS22(4): 17–25.
42.
LeeRG (1999) Orientals: Asian Americans in Popular Culture. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
43.
LeeTYShekDTL (2013) Compensated dating in Hong Kong: Prevalence, psychosocial correlates, and relationships with other risky behaviors. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology26(3): S42–S48.
44.
LehenyDR (2006) Think Global, Fear Local: Sex, Violence, and Anxiety in Contemporary Japan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
45.
LiJCM (2015) Adolescent compensated dating in Hong Kong: Choice, script, and dynamics. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology59(6): 588–610.
46.
LiJCMCheungCKJiaCXS, et al. (2018) Narratives of compensated dating of girls in Hong Kong using routine activity theory: Results of a focus group study of guardians. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology62(2): 360–382.
47.
LiJCMCheungCKJiaCXS, et al. (2019) Exploitation, offense, or private issue? Guardians’ perceptions and self-efficacy in handling girl compensated dating in Hong Kong. Journal of Interpersonal Violence34(14): 3034–3055.
48.
LukeN (2005) Confronting the “sugar daddy” stereotype: Age and economic asymmetries and risky sexual behavior in urban Kenya. International Family Planning Perspectives31(1): 6–14.
49.
MampaneJN (2018) Exploring the “blesser and blessee” phenomenon: Young women, transactional sex, and HIV in rural South Africa. SAGE Open8: 2158244018806343.
50.
MasvawureT (2010) “I just need to be flashy on campus”: Female students and transactional sex at a university in Zimbabwe. Culture, Health & Sexuality12(8): 857–870.
51.
Mavhandu-MudzusiAH (2019) Are “blessers” a refuge for refugee girls in Tshwane, the capital city of South Africa? A phenomenographic study. Journal of International Women’s Studies20(2): 257–270.
52.
MayVM (2015) Pursuing Intersectionality, Unsettling Dominant Imaginaries. New York: Routledge.
53.
MillerA (2011) Sugar dating: A new take on an old issue. Buffalo Journal of Gender, Law and Social Policy20(4): 33–68.
54.
MixonFG (2019) Sugar Daddy U: Human capital investment and the university-based supply of “romantic arrangements.”Applied Economics51(9): 956–971.
55.
MoPKHLauJTFXinM, et al. (2019) Understanding the barriers and factors to HIV testing intention of women engaging in compensated dating in Hong Kong: The application of the extended Theory of Planned Behavior. PLoS ONE14(6): 1–13.
56.
MojolaSA (2014) Love, Money, and HIV: Becoming a Modern Woman in the Age of AIDS. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
57.
MoodleyPEbrahimS (2019) #Blesser: A critical evaluation of conceptual antecedents and the allure of a transactional relationship. Acta Academica51(2): 21–40.
58.
MotylJ (2013) Trading sex for college tuition: How sugar daddy “dating” sites may be sugar coating prostitution. Penn State Law Review117(3): 927–958.
59.
NayarKI (2017) Sweetening the deal: Dating for compensation in the digital age. Journal of Gender Studies26(3): 335–346.
60.
OttMQBärnighausenTTanserF, et al. (2011) Age-gaps in sexual partnerships: Seeing beyond “sugar daddies”. AIDS25(6): 861–863.
61.
PotgieterCStrebelASheferT, et al. (2012) Taxi “sugar daddies” and taxi queens: Male taxi driver attitudes regarding transactional relationships in the Western Cape, South Africa. Sahara Journal9(4): 192–199.
62.
PovinelliEA (2006) The Empire of Love: Toward a Theory of Intimacy, Genealogy, and Carnality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
63.
RakićV (2020) Prostitutes, sex surrogates and sugar babies. Sexuality & Culture24(5): 1207–1217.
64.
RecioRP (2021) ‘I have bills to pay!’: Sugar dating in British higher education institutions. Gender and Education34(5): 545–560.
65.
RecioRP (2022) Blurred lines: Technologies of heterosexual coercion in “sugar dating.”Feminism & Psychology32(1): 44–61.
66.
SaidE (2003) Orientalism. London: Penguin Books.
67.
ScullMT (2020) “It’s its own thing”: A typology of interpersonal sugar relationship scripts. Sociological Perspectives63(1): 135–158.
68.
ScullMT (2022) From seeking financialships to satisfying curiosity: Women’s motivations for entering sugar relationships. Sexuality & Culture26(1): 222–248.
69.
SelikowTMbulaheniT (2013) “I do love him but at the same time I can’t eat love”: Sugar daddy relationships for conspicuous consumption amongst urban university students in South Africa. Agenda27(2): 86–98.
70.
ShapiroJNziokaC (2015) Sugar Dating: An Investigation of “Sponsorship” in Kenya. Nairobi, Kenya: Busara Center for Behavioral Economics.
71.
SheferTClowesLVergnaniT (2012) Narratives of transactional sex on a university campus. Culture, Health & Sexuality14(4): 435–447.
72.
ShimizuCP (2007) The Hypersexuality of Race: Performing Asian/American Women on Screen and Scene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
73.
SilberschmidtMRaschV (2001) Adolescent girls, illegal abortions and “sugar-daddies” in Dar es Salaam: Vulnerable victims and active social agents. Social Science & Medicine52(12): 1815–1826.
74.
SmithDJ (2006) Love and the risk of HIV: Courtship, marriage, & infidelity in southeastern Nigeria. In: HirschJSWardlowH (eds) Modern Loves: The Anthropology of Romantic Courtship and Companionate Marriage. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 135–153.
75.
SongJMorashM (2016) Materialistic desires or childhood adversities as explanations for girls’ trading sex for benefits. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology60(1): 62–81.
StoebenauKNixonSARubincamC, et al. (2011) More than just talk: The framing of transactional sex and its implications for vulnerability to HIV in Lesotho, Madagascar and South Africa. Globalization and Health7: 34.
78.
ThobejaneTDMulaudziTPZithaR (2017) Factors leading to “blesser-blesee” relationships amongst female students: The case of a rural university in Thulamela municipality, Limpopo province, South Africa. Gender and Behaviour15: 8725–8742.
79.
ToskaECluverLDBoyesM, et al. (2015) From “sugar daddies” to “sugar babies”: Exploring a pathway among age-disparate sexual relationships, condom use and adolescent pregnancy in South Africa. Sexual Health12: 59–66.
80.
UenoC (2003) Self-determination on sexuality? Commercialization of sex among teenage girls in Japan. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies4(2): 317–324.
81.
UpadhyayS (2021) Sugaring: Understanding the world of sugar daddies and sugar babies. Journal of Sex Research58(6): 775–784.
