This study’s purpose was to determine whether the personality trait dimensions of Agreeableness and Conscientiousness mediate the relationship between mid-adolescent inconsistent/angry parenting and late adolescent delinquency. A sample of 3701 youth from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children served as participants in this study. A path analysis with two independent variables (inconsistent parenting, angry parenting) and five mediators (Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Neuroticism, and Openness) revealed that, consistent with predictions, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness were the only two personality dimensions to mediate the angry parenting–later delinquency relationship. These results suggest that personality dimensions known to correlate with offending behavior (i.e. low Agreeableness and low Conscientiousness) may be among the mechanisms responsible for linking social conditions like parenting punishment styles marked by angry parenting to youth behaviors like delinquency.
AchenCH (2000) Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the political methodology section of the American Political Science Association, Los Angeles, CA, 20–22July.
2.
AgnewR (1983) Physical punishment and delinquency: A research note. Youth and Society15(2): 225–236.
Australian Institute of Family Studies (2018) Longitudinal Study of Australian Children Data User Guide: December 2018. Southbank, VIC, Australia: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
5.
BanduraA (2001) Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology52(1): 1–26.
6.
BontaJAndrewsD (2017) The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, 6th edn.New York: Routledge.
7.
ColeDAMaxwellSE (2003) Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology112(4): 558–577.
8.
CongerRDNepplTKimKJ, et al. (2003) Angry and aggressive behavior across three generations: A prospective, longitudinal study of parents and children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology31(2): 143–160.
9.
DicksonDJLaursenBValdesO, et al. (2019) Derisive parenting fosters dysregulated anger in adolescent children and subsequent difficulties with peers. Journal of Youth and Adolescence48: 1567–1579.
10.
EvansSZSimonsLGSimonsRL (2012) The effect of corporal punishment and verbal abuse on delinquency: Mediating mechanisms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence41(8): 1095–1110.
11.
FinkelhorDTurnerHWormuthBK, et al. (2019) Corporal punishment: Current rates from a national survey. Journal of Child and Family Studies28(7): 1991–1997.
12.
GershoffET (2002) Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin128(4): 539–579.
HeilmannAMehayAWattRG, et al. (2021) Physical punishment and child outcomes: A narrative review of prospective studies. The Lancet398: 355–364.
15.
HoeveMDubasJSEichelsheimVI, et al. (2009) The relationship between parenting and delinquency: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology37(6): 749–775.
16.
IBM (2019) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 26.0). Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation.
17.
KarevoldEBMathiesenKSBårdstuS, et al. (2018) Temperament and personality development. In: MathiesenKSSansonAVKarevoldEB (eds) Tracking Opportunities and Problems from Infancy to Adulthood: 20 Years with the TOPP Study. Newburyport, MA: Hogrefe, pp. 39–54.
KennyDAJuddCM (2014) Power anomalies in testing mediation. Psychological Science25(2): 334–339.
20.
LukowiakTBridgesJ (2010) Punishment strategies: First choice or last resort. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals2010: 63–72.
21.
LeKDonnellanMBSpilmanSK, et al. (2014) Workers behaving badly: Associations between adolescent reports of the Big Five and counterproductive work behaviors in adulthood. Personality and Individual Differences61–62: 7–12.
22.
LermanDCVorndranCM (2002) On the status of knowledge using punishment: Implications for treating behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis35(4): 431–464.
23.
LuanZHuttemanRDenissenJJA, et al. (2017) Do you see my growth? Two longitudinal studies on personality development from childhood to young adulthood from multiple perspectives. Journal of Research in Personality67: 44–60.
24.
McCraeRRCostaPTJr (2004) A contemplated revision of the NEO five factor inventory. Personality and Individual Differences36(3): 587–596.
25.
ManassisK (2017) Developing Empathy: A Biopsychosocial Approach to Understanding Compassion for Therapists and Parents. New York: Routledge.
26.
MillerJDLynamD (2001) Structural models of personality and their relation to antisocial behavior: A meta-analytic review. Criminology39(4): 765–798.
27.
MulveyEP (2012) The pathways to desistance study: Design and methods. Paper Presented at the American Society of Criminology annual meeting, Chicago, IL, 14–17November.
PattersonGR (1986) Performance models of antisocial boys. American Psychologist41(4): 432–444.
30.
PiqueroARJenningsWGDiamondB, et al. (2016) A meta-analysis update on the effects of early family/parent training programs on antisocial behavior and delinquency. Journal of Experimental Criminology12(2): 229–248.
31.
PontesLBSiqueiraACWilliamsLCA (2019) A systematic literature review of the ACT Raising Safe Kids parenting program. Journal of Child and Family Studies28(12): 3231–3244.
32.
PreacherKJSeligJP (2012) Advantages of Monte Carlo intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures6(2): 77–98.
33.
RammstedtBJohnOP (2007) Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality41(1): 203–212.
34.
RuizMAPincusALSchinkaJA (2008) Externalizing pathology and the five-factor model: A meta-analysis of personality traits associated with antisocial personality disorder, substance use disorder, and their co-occurrence. Journal of Personality Disorders22(4): 365–388.
35.
ShadishWRCookTDCampbellDT (2002) Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Lewistown, PA: Mifflin.
36.
SilvaJ (2009) Parents Raising Safe Kids: ACT 8-Week Program for Parents. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
37.
SkinnerBF (1953) Science and Human Behavior. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
StewartL-LScottK (2014) Who are these guys? An exploration of patterns of parenting problems among fathers who have maltreated their children. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health33(2): 67–83.
39.
SticeEBarreraM (1995) A longitudinal examination of reciprocal relations between perceived parenting and adolescents’ substance use and externalizing behaviors. Developmental Psychology31(2): 322–334.
40.
StormshakEABiermanKLMcMahonRJ, et al. (2000) Parenting practices and child disruptive behavior problems in early elementary school. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology29(1): 17–29.
41.
TetznerJBeckerMBihlerL-M (2022) Personality development in adolescence: Examining big five trait trajectories in differential learning environments. European Journal of Personality. Epub ahead of print 31August. DOI: 10.1177/08902070221121178.
42.
WaltersGD (2016) Friends, cognition, and delinquency: Proactive and reactive criminal thinking as mediators of the peer influence and peer selection effects among male delinquents. Justice Quarterly33(6): 1055–1079.
43.
WaltersGD (2017) Reactive criminal thinking as a consequence of low self-control and prior offending. Deviant Behavior38(2): 119–129.
44.
WaltersGD (2018) Personality and crime: Mediating the agreeableness-offending and conscientiousness-offending relationships with proactive and reactive criminal thinking. Personality and Individual Differences129: 166–170.
45.
WaltersGD (2019) Why are mediation effects so small?International Journal of Social Research Methodology22(2): 219–232.
46.
WaltherCAPCheongJ-WMolinaBSG, et al. (2012) Substance use and delinquency among adolescents with childhood ADHD: The protective role of parenting. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors26(3): 585–598.
47.
WilkinsAS (2018) To lag or not to lag? Re-evaluating the use of lagged dependent variables in regression analysis. Political Science Research and Methods6(2): 393–411.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
