This study examines how attitudes of activism and systematic decision-making are related to support for political violence. Using unique data from a randomly selected sample of undergraduate and graduate students (N = 503), this study explores how activism, systematic decision-making, and political affiliation coincides with existing support for political violence. Among respondents, stronger support for activism and less systematic decision-making behavior was associated with support for political violence on one’s behalf. These results hold across models and suggest that in the United States, cognitive psychology and decision-making perspectives inform the decision to support political violence and in turn, should be considered in efforts to curb support for organizations which use political violence as a tactic.
AsalVHParkHHRethemeyerRK, et al. (2016) With friends like these . . . why terrorist organizations ally. International Public Management Journal19(1): 1–30.
BartlettJMillerC (2012) The edge of violence: Towards telling the difference between violent and non-violent radicalization. Terrorism and Political Violence24(1): 1–21.
4.
BenthamJ (1776) A Fragment on Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BonillaYRosaJ (2015) #Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States: #Ferguson. American Ethnologist42(1): 4–17.
6.
BorumR (2011) Radicalization into violent extremism I: A review of social science theories. Journal of Strategic Security4(4): 7–36.
7.
CaplinADeanM (2015) Revealed preference, rational inattention, and costly information acquisition. American Economic Review105(7): 2183–2203.
8.
ChenowethEStephanMJStephanMJ (2011) Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.
9.
ChermakSMFreilichJDParkinWS, et al. (2012) American terrorism and extremist crime data sources and selectivity bias: An investigation focusing on homicide events committed by far-right extremists. Journal of Quantitative Criminology28(1): 191–218.
10.
CrenshawM (1987) Theories of terrorism: Instrumental and organizational approaches. Journal of Strategic Studies10(4): 13–31.
11.
DeckerSHPyroozDC (2019) Activism and radicalism in prison: Measurement and correlates in a large sample of inmates in Texas. Justice Quarterly36: 787–815.
12.
Della PortaD (2008) Research on social movements and political violence. Qualitative Sociology31(3): 221–230.
13.
Della PortaD (2018) Radicalization: A relational perspective. Annual Review of Political Science21(1): 461–474.
14.
Department of Homeland Security (2017) Countering Violent Extremism Task Force. Available at: https://www.dhs.gov/cve (accessed 14 August 2019).
15.
DuganLChenowethE (2012) Moving beyond deterrence: The effectiveness of raising the expected utility of abstaining from terrorism in Israel. American Sociological Review77(4): 597–624.
FrederickS (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives19(4): 25–42.
18.
GrasmickHGTittleCRBursikRJ, et al. (1993) Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30(1): 5–29.
19.
Harris-HoganSBarrelleKZammitA (2016) What is countering violent extremism? Exploring CVE policy and practice in Australia. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression8(1): 6–24.
20.
HirschiTGottfredsonM (1983) Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology89(3): 552–584.
JacobsR (1997) The Way the Wind Blew: A History of the Weather Underground. New York: Verso.
23.
JensenMASeateAAJamesPA (2018) Radicalization to violence: A pathway approach to studying extremism. Terrorism and Political Violence. Epub ahead of print 9 April. DOI: 10.1080/09546553.2018.1442330.
24.
KahnemanD (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist58(9): 697–720.
25.
KearnsEMAsalVWalshJI, et al. (2018) Political action as a function of grievances, risk, and social identity: An experimental approach. Epub ahead of print 25October. DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2018.1507790.
26.
LaFreeGAckermanG (2009) The empirical study of terrorism: Social and legal research. Annual Review of Law and Social Science5(1): 347–374.
27.
LaFreeGDuganLMillerE (2014) Putting Terrorism in Context: Lessons from the Global Terrorism Database. London: Routledge.
28.
LaFreeGJensenMAJamesPA, et al. (2018) Correlates of violent political extremism in the United States*. Criminology56(2): 233–268.
29.
LouderbackERAntonaccioO (2017) Exploring cognitive decision-making processes, computer-focused cyber deviance involvement and victimization: The role of thoughtfully reflective decision-making. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency54(5): 639–679.
30.
McAdamD (1986) Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer. American Journal of Sociology92(1): 64–90.
31.
McCauleyCMoskalenkoS (2017) Understanding political radicalization: The two-pyramids model. American Psychologist72(3): 205–216.
32.
McCauleyCRMoskalenkoS (2016) Friction: How Conflict Radicalizes Them and Us. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
MalthanerSWaldmannP (2014) The radical milieu: Conceptualizing the supportive social environment of terrorist groups. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism37(12): 979–998.
34.
MatsuedaRLHeimerK (1987) Race, family structure, and delinquency: A test of differential association and social control theories. American Sociological Review52(6): 826–840.
35.
MoskalenkoSMcCauleyC (2009) Measuring political mobilization: The distinction between activism and radicalism. Terrorism and Political Violence21(2): 239–260.
36.
NaginDSPogarskyG (2001) Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extralegal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: Theory and evidence. Criminology39: 865–892.
37.
NepstadSSmithC (1999) Rethinking recruitment to high-risk/cost activism: The case of Nicaragua exchange. Mobilization: An International Quarterly4(1): 25–40.
38.
NeumannPR (2013) The trouble with radicalization. International Affairs89(4): 873–893.
39.
PaternosterRPogarskyG (2009) Rational choice, agency and thoughtfully reflective decision making: The short and long-term consequences of making good choices. Journal of Quantitative Criminology25(2): 103–127.
40.
SagemanM (2004) Understanding Terror Networks. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
41.
SagemanM (2017) Turning to Political Violence: The Emergence of Terrorism. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
42.
SantoroWAAzabM (2015) Arab American protest in the terror decade: Macro- and micro-level response to post-9/11 repression. Social Problems62(2): 219–240.
43.
SimonHA (2000) Bounded rationality in social science: Today and tomorrow. Mind & Society1(1): 25–39.
44.
TverskyAKahnemanD (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science211(4481): 453–458.
45.
WalshJ (2000) Organizing the scale of labor regulation in the United States: Service-sector activism in the city. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space32(9): 1593–1610.
46.
WhiteRW (1989) From peaceful protest to guerrilla war: Micromobilization of the Provisional Irish Republican Army. American Journal of Sociology94(6): 1277–1302.
47.
WiltfangGLMcAdamD (1991) The costs and risks of social activism: A study of sanctuary movement activism. Social Forces69(4): 987–1010.
