This article assesses the development and implementation of the Community Remedy anti-social behaviour policy by Police and Crime Commissioners (PCCs) in England and Wales. The Community Remedy, introduced by the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act (2014), allows victims of ‘low-level’ anti-social behaviour to select an informal action for their offender from a list designed by their local PCC via consultation with the public. This article reports the results of a benchmarking exercise that investigates how PCCs have translated this policy into practice by examining: public consultation procedures; the contents of the Community Remedy documents; and police usage. The findings indicate an uneven implementation across regions with variable levels of engagement from PCCs, police forces and members of the public. We assess the enactment and adoption of this new power alongside its potential to stimulate democratic localism.
BazemoreG (2000) Community justice and a vision of collective efficacy: The case of restorative conferencing. In: HorneyJ (ed.) Policies, Processes and Decisions of the Criminal Justice System. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
BowsH (2017) Researching sexual violence against older people: Reflecting on the use of Freedom of Information requests in a feminist study. Feminist Review115(1): 30–45.
5.
BraithwaiteJ (1989) Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CooperCBrownGPowellH, et al. (2009) Exploration of local variations in the use of anti-social behaviour tools and powers. Home Office Research Report 21. London: Home Office.
9.
CrawfordAClearT (2001) Community justice: Transforming communities through restorative justice? In: BazemoreGSchiffM (eds) Restorative Community Justice: Repairing Harm and Transforming Communities. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publications.
10.
DaviesP (2007) Criminal (in)justice for victims? In: DaviesPFrancisPGreerC (eds) Victims, Crime and Society. London: SAGE.
11.
Derbyshire Police and Crime Commissioner (2018) Core: Supporting victims of crime in Derbyshire to cope and recover. Available at: http://www.core-derbyshire.com/ (accessed February 2018).
12.
DugganMHeapV (2014) Administrating Victimization: The Politics of Anti-Social Behaviour and Hate Crime Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
FeatherstoneDInceAMackinnonD, et al. (2012) Boundary crossings: Progressive localism and the construction of political alternatives. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. London: British Geographical Society.
15.
HeapV (2010) Understanding public perceptions of anti-social behaviour: Problems and policy responses. PhD Thesis, University of Huddersfield, UK.
16.
HeapV (2016) Putting victims first? A critique of Coalition anti-social behaviour policy. Critical Social Policy36(2): 265–288.
17.
HeapVDickinsonJ (2018) Public spaces protection orders: A critical policy analysis. Safer Communities17(3): 182–192.
18.
HodgkinsonSTilleyN (2011) Tackling anti-social behaviour: Lessons from New Labour for the Coalition government. Criminology and Criminal Justice11(4): 283–305.
19.
Home Office (2012a) Putting victims first: More effective responses to antisocial behaviour. London: Home Office.
Home Office (2013) Community Remedy consultation response. London: Home Office.
22.
Home Office (2014) Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Police Act 2014: Reform of anti-social behaviour powers statutory guidance for frontline professionals. London: Home Office.
23.
Home Office (2017) Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014: Anti-social behaviour powers statutory guidance for frontline professionals. London: Home Office.
24.
McColdPWachtelT (1996) In pursuit of paradigm: A theory of restorative justice. International Institute for Restorative Practices. Available at: www.restorativepractices.org. (accessed April, 2016).
25.
MarshallT (1999) Restorative justice: An overview. London: Home Office.
Ministry of Justice (2014) Restorative justice action plan for the criminal justice system for the period to March 2018. London: Ministry of Justice.
30.
MooreDBForsytheL (1995) A new approach to juvenile justice: An evaluation of family group conferencing in Wagga Wagga. Report to the Criminology Research Council, Wagga Wagga, Australia.
ReinerR (2013) Who governs? Democracy, plutocracy, science, and prophecy in policing. Criminology and Criminal Justice13(2): 161–180.
37.
RoyA (2010) Informality and the politics of planning. In: HillierJHealeyP (eds) The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges to Spatial Planning Theory. Farnham: Ashgate.
38.
SampsonRRaudenbushSEarlsF (1997) Neighbourhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science277(5328): 918–924.
39.
SavageAHydeR (2014) Using Freedom of Information requests to facilitate research. International Journal of Social Research Methodologies17(3): 303–317.
40.
ShaplandJAtkinsonAAtkinsonH (2008) Restorative justice: Does restorative justice affect reconviction? The fourth report from the evaluation of three schemes. London: Ministry of Justice.
41.
ShaplandJCrawfordAGrayE, et al. (2017) Developing restorative policing in Humberside, South Yorkshire and West Yorkshire. Sheffield: Centre for Criminological Research.
42.
ShermanLWStrangH (2012) Restorative justice as evidence-based sentencing. In: PetersiliaJReitzKR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 215–243.
