This article makes the case for greater use of systematic archival research as a methodological tool of criminology. Drawing upon insights from the author’s 2018 historical study of ‘early release’ in England and Wales, it reviews the legal framework underpinning the current ‘right of access’ to official records and demonstrates how greater engagement with this underused public resource can reveal a richer understanding of penal policy making and the continuities and dislocations within contemporary criminal justice. It goes on to consider the methodological challenges of gaining access to historical sources in criminological settings and concludes with a number of reflections upon the evolution of the discipline at a time of digital abundance and significant changes in government record keeping.
The Churchill Archives Centre: Churchill/ HLSM 2/42/2/16. The Papers of Lord Hailsham: ‘Criminal Justice Bill’ by Quintin Hogg, LCC (66) 115, 8December1966. Unpublished.
2.
The National Archives (TNA): CAB 134/2956. Legislation Committee, 22November1966. Unpublished.
3.
The National Archives (TNA): HO 291/1246. Home Office. Examining further ways of reducing prison. Unpublished.
4.
The National Archives (TNA): HO 383/219. Home Office. Central Council of Probation Committees: Future after-care responsibilities of committees. Unpublished.
5.
The National Archives (TNA): TNA: PCOM 9/2248. Home Office. Release on licence: Method of selection; Criminal Justice Bill 1966. Unpublished.
6.
AllanA (2014) Records review. London: Cabinet Office.
7.
AllanA (2015) Review of government digital records. London: Cabinet Office.
8.
AllenF (1981) The Decline of the Rehabilitative Ideal: Penal Policy and Social Purpose. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
AmentaE (2009) Making the most of an historical case study: Configuration, sequence, casing, and the US old-age pension movement. In: RaginCCByrneD (eds) The Handbook of Case-Oriented Methods. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
10.
AnnisonH (2018) The policymakers’ dilemma: Change, continuity and enduring rationalities of English penal policy. British Journal of Criminology58(5): 1066–1086.
11.
BarkerVMillerLL (2017) Introduction to the special issue on the state of the State. Theoretical Criminology21(4): 417–421.
12.
BosworthM (2001) The past as a foreign country? Some methodological implications of doing historical criminology. British Journal of Criminology41(3): 431–442.
13.
BottomsAE (1995) The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing. In: ClarksonCMorganR (eds) The Politics of Sentencing Reform. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
14.
BrownK (2009) COUNTERBLAST: Freedom of information as a research tool: Realizing its potential. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice48(1): 88–91.
15.
CareyPTurleM (eds) (2008) Freedom of Information Handbook. London: The Law Society.
16.
De CerteauM (1988) The historiographical operation. In: The Writing of History. Trans. ConleyT.New York: Columbia University Press.
17.
De GiorgiA (2006) Re-Thinking the Political Economy of Punishment: Perspectives on Post-Fordism and Penal Politics. Aldershot: Ashgate.
18.
DerridaJ (1996) Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. Trans. PrenowitzE.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
DownesDMorganR (2007) No turning back: The politics of law and order into the millennium. In: MaguireMMorganRReinerR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
FarrallSGrayEJenningsW, et al. (2014) Using ideas derived from historical institutionalism to illuminate the long-term impacts on crime of ‘Thatcherite’ social and economic policies: A working paper. Long-term Trajectories of Crime in the UK Working Paper No. 1.
21.
FaulknerD (2014) Servant of the Crown: A Civil Servant’s Story of Criminal Justice and Public Service Reform. London: Waterside Press.
22.
FreibergA (1997) Commercial confidentiality, criminal justice, and the public interest. Current Issues in Criminal Justice9(2): 125–152.
23.
GarlandD (1985) Punishment and Welfare: A History of Penal Strategies. Aldershot: Gower.
24.
GarlandD (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
GodfreyB (2011) Historical and archival research methods. In: GaddDKarstedtSMesnerS (eds) The Handbook on Criminology Research Methods. New York: SAGE.
26.
GodfreyBSLawrencePWilliamsCA (eds) (2008) History & Crime. London: SAGE.
27.
GuineyT (2018) Getting Out: Early Release in England and Wales, 1960–1995. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Clarendon Studies in Criminology).
28.
GunnSFaireL (eds) (2012) Research Methods for History. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
29.
HayC (2002) Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
HazellRGloverM (2011) The impact of freedom of information on Whitehall. Public Administration89(4): 1664–1681.
31.
HennessyP (2012) Distilling the Frenzy: Writing the History of One’s Own Times. London: Biteback Publishing.
32.
JonesTNewburnT (2004) Comparative criminal justice policy-making in the United States and the United Kingdom: The case of private prisons. British Journal of Criminology45(1): 58–80.
KingMT (2012) Working with/in the archives. In: GunnSFaireL (eds) Research Methods for History. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
35.
LawrenceP (2012) History, criminology and the ‘use’ of the past. Theoretical Criminology16(3): 313–328.
36.
LeeR (2005) The UK Freedom of Information Act and social research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology8(1): 1–18.
37.
LoaderISparksR (2004) For an historical sociology of crime policy in England and Wales since 1968. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy7(2): 5–32.
38.
MahoneyJRueschemeyerD (2003) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
MarxGT (1984) Notes on the discovery, collection, and assessment of hidden and dirty data. In: SchneiderJKitsuseJ (eds) Studies in the Sociology of Social Problems. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
40.
MatthewsR (2005) The myth of punitiveness. Theoretical Criminology9(2): 175–201.
41.
MertonRK (1967) On Theoretical Sociology. New York: Free Press.
42.
MorrisT (1989) Crime and Criminal Justice in Britain since 1945. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
43.
MurphyCJLomasDWB (2014) Return to Neverland? Freedom of information and the history of British intelligence. Historical Journal57: 273–287.
44.
NewburnT (2007) ‘Tough on crime’: Penal policy in England and Wales. In: TonryM (ed.) Crime, Punishment and Politics in Comparative Perspective. Volume 36 of Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
RadzinowiczL (1948) A History of English Criminal Law and Its Administration from 1750 (Vol. I). London: Stevens and Sons.
47.
RockP (1995) The opening stages of criminal justice policy making. British Journal of Criminology35(1): 1–16.
48.
RockP (2005) Chronocentrism and British criminology. British Journal of Sociology56(3): 473–479.
49.
SavageAHydeR (2014) Using freedom of information requests to facilitate research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology17(3): 303–317.
50.
SewellWH (2006) Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51.
TillyC (2006) Why and how history matters. In: GoodinRETillyC (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
VincentD (1998) The Culture of Secrecy: Britain 1832–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
WacquantL (2009) Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
56.
WilliamsCEmsleyC (2006) Beware of the leopard? Police archives in Great Britain. In: ProcterMCookMG (eds) Political Pressure and the Archival Record. Chicago, IL: Society of American Archivists.
57.
WindleshamL (1993) Responses to Crime. Volume 2: Penal Policy in the Making. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
58.
YoungJ (1999) The Exclusive Society: Social Exclusion, Crime and Difference in Late Modernity. London: SAGE.
