Exploring the punitive surge: Crown Court sentencing practices before and after the 2011 English riots

Abstract

The English summer riots of 2011 resulted in the criminal justice system having to process an unprecedented number of offenders in a short timeframe. This study explores sentencing practice in the wake of the riots using the 2011 Crown Court Sentencing Survey. A multilevel model was implemented to specify the probability of receiving a custodial sentence for offences of commercial burglary. This model allows exploring differences in sentencing before and after the riots. An increased probability of receiving a custodial sentence in the post-riot period was identified. An increase in variability was also detected, changing from a state of almost perfect consistency to one in which substantial variation was observed between courts. Custodial rates for burglary increased to a level associated with more serious offences, thereby undermining the principle of proportionality. This, as well as the increased dispersion between courts, challenges other principles such as legal certainty and transparency.

Keywords

Burglary consistency guidelines riots sentencing severity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Spohn

(2011) Lawlessness in the federal sentencing process: A test for uniformity and consistency in sentence outcomes. Justice Quarterly 27: 362–393.

Anderson

Kling

Stith

(1999) Measuring inter-judge sentencing disparity: Before and after the federal sentencing guidelines. Journal of Law & Economics 42: 271–307.

Ashworth

(2012) Departures from the English guidelines. Criminal Law Review 81–96.

Ashworth

(2015) Sentencing and Criminal Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ashworth

Roberts

(eds) (2013) Sentencing Guidelines: Exploring the English Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bell

Jaitman

Machin

(2014) Crime deterrence: Evidence from the London 2011 riots. The Economic Journal 124(May): 480–506.

Bottoms

Von Hirsch

(2010) The crime-preventive impact of penal sanctions. In: Cane

Kritzer

(eds) Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cameron

(2011) HC Deb, 11 August 2011, col. 1051–1055.

Cooper

(2011) Riots have led to a disproportionate increase in sentencing. Guardian, 9 September. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/libertycentral/2011/sep/09/riots-disproportionate-increase-sentencing.

10.

Court of Appeal (2012) In the Court of Appeal Criminal Division. Annual report 2011/12. Court of Appeal. Available at: https://www.crimeline.info/uploads/docs/ctofappeal.pdf.

11.

Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) (2011) Public disorder – August 2011 guidance for prosecutors on charging public order and other offences. Available at: http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/p_to_r/public_disorder_-_guidance_for_prosecutors_on_charging_public_order_and_other_offences_(august_2011)/.

12.

Davies

Takala

Tyrer

(2002) Sentencing burglars in England and Finland: A pilot study. In: Tata

Hutton

(eds) Sentencing and Society: International Perspectives. Aldershot: Ashgate.

13.

Farrington

(2016) Summary Justice: Are the Magistrates Up to It? Kibworth Beauchamp, Leicester: Troubador.

14.

Hohl

Stanko

Newburn

(2012) The effect of the 2011 London disorder on public opinion of police and attitudes towards crime, disorder and sentencing. Policing 7(1): 12–20.

15.

Jefferson

(2015) The 2011 English riots: A contextualised, dynamic, grounded exploration. Contention 2(2): 5–22.

16.

Lewis

Newburn

Taylor

M, et al.

(2011) Reading the riots: Investigating England’s summer of disorder. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/46297/1/reading%20the%20riots(published).pdf.

17.

Lightowlers

Quirk

(2015) The 2011 English ‘riots’: Prosecutorial zeal and judicial abandon. British Journal of Criminology 55(1): 65–85.

18.

Lowenstein

(2016) Emotive riot sentencing remarks: Qualitative analysis of the English judicial perspective. Internet Journal of Criminology ISSN 20456743 (online).

19.

McConville

Marsh

(2014) Criminal Judges: Legitimacy, Courts and State-Induced Guilty Pleas in Britain. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

20.

Ministry of Justice (2011) Statistical Bulletin on the Public Disorder of 6th to 9th August 2011 – October Update. London: Ministry of Justice.

21.

Ministry of Justice (2012a) Statistical Bulletin on the Public Disorder of 6th to 9th August 2011 – February Update. London: Ministry of Justice.

22.

Ministry of Justice (2012b) Statistical Bulletin on the Public Disorder of 6th to 9th August 2011 – September 2012 Update. London: Ministry of Justice.

23.

Nacro (2011) Nacro’s response to the interim report from the Riots, Communities and Victims Panel. London: Nacro.

24.

Newburn

(2015) The 2011 England riots in recent historical perspective. British Journal of Criminology 55: 39–64.

25.

Pina-Sánchez

(2015) Defining and measuring consistency in sentencing. In: Roberts

(ed.) Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 76–92.

26.

Pina-Sánchez

Linacre

(2013) Sentencing consistency in England and Wales: Evidence form the Crown Court sentencing survey. British Journal of Criminology 53: 1118–1138.

27.

Riots Communities and Victims Panel (2012) After the riots: The final report of the riots. London: Riots Communities and Victims Panel.

28.

Roberts

(2010) Re-examining first offender discounts at sentencing. In: Roberts

Von Hirsch

(eds) Previous Convictions at Sentencing: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives. Studies in Penal Theory and Ethics. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

29.

Roberts

(2012) Points of departure: Reflections on sentencing outside the definitive guidelines ranges. Criminal Law Review 6: 439–448.

30.

Roberts

(2013) Sentencing guidelines in England and Wales: Recent developments and emerging issues. Law and Contemporary Problems 76(1): 1–26.

31.

Roberts

Hough

(2013) Public attitudes to sentencing riot related offending. British Journal of Criminology 53: 234–256.

32.

Sentencing Guidelines Council (2008) Theft and burglary in a building other than a dwelling. Available at: http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/.

33.

Sentencing Council (2011) Burglary offences: Definitive guideline. Available at: http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/.

34.

Sentencing Council (2012) Crown Court Sentencing Survey 2011. Annual publication. Available at: http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/facts/crown-survey-results-2011.htm.

35.

Sentencing Council (2013) Crown Court Sentencing Survey. Annual publication 2012. Available at: https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/CCSS_Annual_2012.pdf.

36.

Thomas

(2012) Commentary. Criminal Law Review 1: 62.

37.

Von Hirsch

(1993) Censure and Sanctions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

38.

Webster

Doob

(2012) Searching for Sasquatch: Deterrence of crime through sentence severity. In: Petersilia

Reitz

(eds) Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections. New York: Oxford University Press.

39.

R v Alagago and Others (2011) Sentencing remarks. Available at: http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/media/judgments/2011/r-v-alagago-others-sentencing-remarks-25082011.

40.

R v Blackshaw and Others [2011] EWCA Crim. 2312; [2012] 1 WLR 1126.

41.

R v Carter and Others (2011) Sentencing remarks. EW Misc. 12 (CrownC). Available at: http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Judgments/hhj-gilbart-qcsentencing-remarks-r-v-carter-others.pdf.

42.

R v Twemlow, Downy, McGrath, Coudjoe, Swarbrick and Winder (2011) Crown Court at Manchester, 18 August.