This reply to Valverde seeks to examine what she means by speaking of the logics of security. After critiquing the elements she uses to characterize such projects it then applies her approach to the examples of fighting cybercrime and creating global social indicators.
CrawfordA (ed.) (2011) International and Comparative Criminal Justice and Urban Governance: Convergence and Divergence in Global, National and Local Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
DavisKEKingsburyBMerrySE (eds) (2012) Governance by Indicators. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
DouglasM (ed.) (2010 [1982]) Essays on the Sociology of Perception. London: Routledge.
4.
GlennyM (2011) Dark Market. London: Bodley Head.
5.
GurvitchG (1964) The Spectrum of Time. Dordecht: Reidel.
6.
NelkenD (1989) Discipline and punish: Some notes on the margin. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice28(4): 245–254.
7.
NelkenD (2014) Afterword: Contesting global indicators. In: MerrySDavisKKingsburyB (eds) Measuring Development, Corruption and the Rule of Law: The Production and Use of Indicators for Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
ValverdeM (2011) Questions of security: A framework for research. Theoretical Criminology15(1): 3–22.
9.
WaldenI (2011) Accessing data in the Cloud: The long arm of the law enforcement agent. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1781067.
