This article reports on the results of a quasi-experimental study of practitioners’ skills in probation work. Videotaped interviews were produced by a group of probation officers and analysed by researchers using a checklist designed to identify the range of skills used in one-to-one supervision. Reconviction rates were found to be significantly lower among those whose supervisors were assessed as using a wider range of skills. The article also reviews the recent history of research on practitioners’ skills in probation, and considers the implications of positive findings from this and other studies.
AndrewsDABontaJ (1995) The Level of Service Inventory-Revised Manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
2.
AndrewsDAZingerIHogeRDBontaJGendreauPCullenFT (1990) Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology28(3): 369–404.
3.
BontaJBourgonGRuggeTScottTYessineAKGutierrezLLiJ (2011) An experimental demonstration of training probation officers in evidence-based community supervision. Criminal Justice and Behavior38(11): 1127–1148.
4.
BontaJRuggeTScottTBourgonGYessineAK (2008) Exploring the black box of community supervision. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation47(3): 248–270.
5.
BrodySR (1976) The Effectiveness of Sentencing. Home Office Research Study 35. London: HMSO.
6.
BurnettR (2004) One-to-one ways of promoting desistance: In search of an evidence base. In: BurnettRRobertsC (eds) What Works in Probation and Youth Justice. Cullompton: Willan,pp. 152–180.
7.
BurnettRMcNeillF (2005) The place of the officer–offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime. Probation Journal52(3): 221–242.
8.
CarterP (2003) Managing Offenders, Reducing Crime: A New Approach (The Correctional Services Review). London: Home Office.
9.
DebidinM (ed.) (2009) A Compendium of Research and Analysis on the Offender Assessment System (OASys) 2006–2009. Research Series 16/09. London: Ministry of Justice.
10.
DowdenCAndrewsDA (2004) The importance of staff practice in delivering effective correctional treatment: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology48(2): 203–214.
11.
DurnescuI (2012) What matters most in probation supervision: Staff characteristics, staff skills or programme?Criminology and Criminal Justice12(2): 193–216.
FarrallS (2012) Investigating the Long-Term Impact of Probation Supervision. Offender Engagement Research Bulletin 15. London: National Offender Management Service.
14.
FischerJ (1976) The Effectiveness of Social Casework. Springfield: CC Thomas.
15.
GrapesT (2006) The NOMS Offender Management Model. London: National Offender Management Service.
16.
GrünhutM (1952) Probation in Germany. Howard Journal8(3): 168–174.
17.
HollinCR (1995) The meaning and implications of ‘programme integrity’. In: McGuireJ (ed.) What Works: Reducing Reoffending. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 195–208.
18.
HollinCR (2008) Evaluating offending behaviour programmes: Does only randomization glister?Criminology and Criminal Justice8(1): 89–106.
Home Office (1996) Guidance for the Probation Service on the Offender Group Reconviction Scale. Probation Circular 63/1996. London: Home Office.
21.
HoughMAllenRPadelU (eds) (2006) Reshaping Probation and Prisons: The New Offender Management Framework. Bristol: Policy Press.
22.
HowardM (1993) Speech to Conservative Party conference, Blackpool, 6October.
23.
LipseyM (1992) Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic enquiry into the variability of effects. In: CookTCooperHCordrayDSHartmannHHedgesLVLightRLLouisTAMostellerF (eds) Meta-Analysis for Explanation: A Case-Book. New York: Russell Sage, pp. 83–127.
24.
McGuireJ (2002) Integrating findings from research reviews. In: McGuireJ (ed.) Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment. Chichester, Wiley, pp. 3–38.
25.
McNeillF (2006) A desistance paradigm for offender management. Criminology and Criminal Justice6(1): 39–62.
26.
McNeillFRaynorPTrotterC (eds) (2010) Offender Supervision: New Directions in Theory, Research and Practice. Abingdon: Willan.
27.
MaguireMRaynorP (2006) How the resettlement of prisoners promotes desistance from crime: Or does it?Criminology and Criminal Justice6(1): 19–38.
28.
MaguireMRaynorP (2010) Putting the OM into NOMS: Problems and possibilities for offender management. In: BrayfordJCoweFDeeringJ (eds) What Else Works? Creative Work with Offenders. Cullompton: Willan, pp. 236–253.
29.
MartinsonR (1974) What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest35: 22–54.
30.
MarunaS (2001) Making Good. Washington: American Psychological Association.
31.
MilesHRaynorP (2004) Community Sentences in Jersey: Risks, Needs and Rehabilitation. St Helier: Jersey Probation and After-Care Service.
32.
MilesHRaynorPCosterB (2009) Community Sentences and their Outcomes in Jersey: The Third Report. St Helier: Jersey Probation and After-Care Service.
33.
Ministry of Justice (2010) Breaking the Cycle: Effective Punishment, Rehabilitation and Sentencing of Offenders. Cm 7972. London: Ministry of Justice.
34.
PaparozziMAGendreauP (2005) An intensive supervision program that worked: Service delivery, professional orientation, and organizational supportiveness. The Prison Journal85(4): 445–466.
35.
RaynorP (2007) Risk and need assessment in British probation: The contribution of LSI-R. Psychology, Crime and Law13(2): 125–138.
36.
RaynorP (2008) Community penalties and Home Office research: On the way back to ‘nothing works’?Criminology and Criminal Justice8(1): 73–87.
37.
RaynorP (2011) Observing Supervision Skills – the Jersey Study. Offender Engagement Research Bulletin 9. London: National Offender Management Service.
38.
RaynorPMilesH (2005) The Conduct and Effectiveness of Parish Hall Enquiries. St Helier: Jersey Probation and After-Care Service.
39.
RaynorPMilesH (2007) Evidence-based probation in a microstate: The British Channel Island of Jersey. European Journal of Criminology4(3): 299–313.
40.
RaynorPVanstoneM (1984) Putting practice into theory – an in-college skills training programme. Issues in Social Work Education4(2): 85–93.
41.
RaynorPVanstoneM (1996) Reasoning and rehabilitation in Britain: The results of the Straight Thinking On Probation (STOP) programme. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology40(4): 272–284.
42.
RaynorPVanstoneM (2001) Straight Thinking On Probation: Evidence-based practice and the culture of curiosity. In: BernfeldGFarringtonDLeschiedA (eds) Offender Rehabilitation in Practice. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 189–203.
43.
RaynorPUgwudikePVanstoneM (2010) Skills and strategies in probation supervision: The Jersey study. In: McNeillFRaynorPTrotterC (eds) Offender Supervision: New Directions in Theory, Research and Practice. Abingdon: Willan, pp. 113–129.
44.
RexS (2012) The Offender Engagement Programme – rationale and objectives. EuroVista2(1): 6–9.
45.
RobinsonCRLowenkampCTHolsingerAMVanBenschotenSAlexanderMOlesonJC (2012) A random study of Staff Training Aimed at Reducing Re-arrest (STARR): Using core correctional practices in probation interactions. Journal of Crime and Justice. Epub ahead of print 19April2012. DOI: 10.1080/0735648X.2012.674823.
46.
SadlierG (2010) Evaluation of the Impact of the HM Prison Service Enhanced Thinking Skills Programme on Reoffending. Research Series 19/10. London: Ministry of Justice.
47.
TaxmanFS (2008) No illusions: Offender and organizational change in Maryland’s proactive community supervision efforts. Criminology and Public Policy7(2): 275–302.
48.
TrotterC (1993) The Supervision of Offenders – What Works? A Study Undertaken in Community Based Corrections, Victoria. Melbourne: Social Work Department, Monash University and Victoria Department of Justice.
49.
TrotterC (1996) The impact of different supervision practices in community corrections. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology28(2): 29–46.
50.
TrotterCEvansP (2012) An analysis of supervision skills in youth probation. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology45(2): 255–273.
51.
UnderdownA (1998) Strategies for Effective Offender Supervision: Report of the HMIP What Works Project. London: Home Office.
52.
VanstoneMRaynorP (2012) Observing Interview Skills: A Manual for Users of the Jersey Supervision Interview Checklist. St Helier: Jersey Probation and After-Care Service.
53.
WeaverBMcNeillF (2012) Managing cases or supporting change? Some implications of desistance research for case management. EuroVista2(1): 97–108.
