This paper considers the rise of third sector agencies as key criminal justice providers within the context of the marketization of probation and other crime management responses. We posit that the ‘rehabilitation revolution’ has significant implications for the voluntary and community sector in particular and criminal justice provision in general. Pointing towards incremental colonization of the third sector by criminal justice concerns, we trace the creeping discourse of economic risk, exemplified by the commodification of provision, increased contractualization of services and the application of cost–benefit measures. We argue that government policy is being driven by a behavioural economics of risk that attempts to ‘nudge’ the sector in discrete directions through the use of incentivization, market competition and steers toward entrepreneurship. In such a context, the position of marginal groups with high needs but potentially poorer outcomes may be perilous, consigning high risk and ‘at-risk’ groups to further exclusion.
BBC News Online (2010) Private backers fund scheme to cut prisoner reoffending. BBC News Online, 10September.
2.
BeckU (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
3.
BeckU (2009) World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity.
4.
BroadhurstKHallCWastellDWhiteSPithouseA (2010) Risk, instrumentalism and the humane project in social work: Identifying the informal logics of risk management in children’s statutory services. British Journal of Social Work40: 1046–64.
5.
BubbS (2011) Prime Minister David Cameron defends big society policy. BBC News Online, 13February.
6.
CameronD (2011) Speech on the Big Society. Milton Keynes, 23May.
7.
CarlenP (2002) Controlling measures: The repackaging of common-sense opposition to women’s imprisonment in England and Canada. Criminal Justice2(2): 155–72.
Chesney-LindM (2006) Patriarchy, crime and justice; Feminist criminology in an era or backlash. Feminist Criminology1(1): 6–26.
12.
Chesney-LindMPaskoL (2004) The Female Offender: Girls, Women and Crime. London: Sage.
13.
ChorleyM (2011) Battle of the Big Society: Tories go on the offensive. The Independent, 13February.
14.
Clinks (2010) ‘Payment by results: What does it mean for voluntary organizations working with offenders?’. Available at: www.clinks.org.uk (retrieved 22 June 2011).
15.
Clinks (2011) ‘Clinks response to the Ministry Of Justice green paper: Breaking the cycle: Effective rehabilitation, sentencing and punishment of offenders’. Available at: www.clinks.org.uk (retrieved 22 June 2011).
16.
Corston Report (2007) Women with Particular Vulnerabilities in the Criminal Justice System. London: Home Office.
17.
CurtisP (2011) Big Society tsar Lord Wei doesn’t have enough time to perform role. The Guardian, 11February.
18.
DavidsonJChesney-LindM (2009) Discounting women: Context matters in risk and need assessment. Critical Criminology17: 221–45.
19.
EastonHSilvestriMEvansKMatthewsRWalklateS (2010) Conditional cautions: Evaluation of the women specific condition pilot. Ministry of Justice Research Series 14/10. London: Ministry of Justice.
20.
EatonM (1993) Women after Prison. Buckingham: Open University Press.
21.
EvansKWalklateS (2011) The Corston report: Reading even further between the lines. The Prison Journal March194: 8–11.
22.
FarringtonDPPainterK (2004) Gender differences in risk factors for offending. Home Office Findings196. London: Home Office.
23.
FoxCAlbertsonK (2011) Payment by results and social impact bonds in the criminal justice sector: New challenges for the concept of evidence-based policy?Criminology and Criminal Justice11(5): 395–413.
24.
GelsthorpeLHeddermanC (1997) The Sentencing of Women. HORS 170. London: HMSO.
25.
GelsthorpeLSharpeGRobertsJ (2007) Provision for Women Offenders in the Community. London: Fawcett Society.
26.
Hannah-MoffattK (2006) Pandora’s box: Risk/need and gender responsive corrections. Criminology and Public Policy5(1): 183–91.
27.
Her Majesty’s Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate (HMCPSI) (2007) Without Consent. London: HMCPSI.
28.
Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabularies and Her Majesty’s Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate (HMIC/CPSI) (2004) Violence at Home. London: HMIC/CPSI.
29.
Home Office (2007) ‘The government’s response to the report by Baroness Corston of a review of women with particular vulnerabilities in the criminal justice system’. Available at: at http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/corston-review.pdf (retrieved 24 May 2012).
30.
HoyleC (2008) Will she be safe? A critical analysis of risk assessment in domestic violence cases. Children and Youth Services Review30: 323–37.
31.
Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) (2009) Deaths Following Police Contact Statistics for England and Wales 2008–9. London: IPCC
32.
KemshallH (2010) Risk rationalities in contemporary social work policy and practice. British Journal of Social Work. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp157
33.
McSweeneyTHoughM (2006) Supporting offenders with multiple needs: Lessons for the ‘mixed economy’ model of service provision. Criminology and Criminal Justice6(1): 107–25.
Nacro (2011) ‘Developing proposals for sentencing and achieving a rehabilitation revolution’. Available at: www.Nacro.org.uk (retrieved 19 June 2011).
38.
O’BrienN (2010) Payment by results will offer a chance to slash reoffending rates. Daily Telegraph Online, 14th April.
39.
O’MalleyP (2001) Discontinuity, government and risk: A response to Rigakos and Hadden. Theoretical Criminology5: 85–92.
40.
O’MalleyP (2006) Criminology and risk. In: MythenGWalklateS (eds) Beyond the Risk Society. London: McGraw-Hill, 43–59.
41.
O’MalleyP (2010) Crime and Risk. London: Sage.
42.
RadfordLGillA (2006) Losing the plot? Researching community safety partnership work against domestic violence. The Howard Journal45(4): 369–87.
43.
RobinsonA (2010) Risk and intimate partner violence. In: KemshallHWilkinsonB (eds) Good Practice in Risk Assessment and Risk Management, 3rd edition.London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
44.
RobinsonN (2010) Prisons: A rehabilitation revolution?. BBC News Online, 6December.
45.
RumgayJ (2004) When Victims Become Offenders; Searching for Coherence in Policy and Practice. London: The Fawcett Society.
46.
SmithDJMcAraL (2004) Gender and youth offending. The Edinburgh Study of Youth Transitions and Crime2. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh.
47.
The Conservative Party (2010) Policy: Protecting Security: Prisons with a Purpose. London: The Conservative Party.
48.
VennardJHeddermanC (2009) Helping offenders into employment: How far is voluntary sector expertise valued in a contracting out environment?Criminology and Criminal Justice9(2): 225–46.
