This article is a response to Sherman (2009) and argues that experimental criminology ought to clearly acknowledge the political aspect of much crime research, and expand the timeframe of research involvement in policy making if it is to bring the liberty promised. Failure to do so can lead to a fundamental misconception that experimental criminology is somehow divorced from the political realities that inscribe it, and to possible unintended consequences in the deployment of policy. The example of use of the so-called ‘stop and frisk’ crime policy in Philadelphia is used to examine Sherman’s claims.
Brooks, R.R.W. ( 2000) ‘Fear and Fairness in the City: Criminal Enforcement and Perceptions of Fairness in Minority Communities’ , Southern California Law Review73: 1219-1270.
2.
Carr, P.J. , L. Napolitano and J. Keating ( 2007) ‘We Never Call the Cops and Here is Why: A Qualitative Examination of Legal Cynicism in Three Philadelphia Neighborhoods’ , Criminology45(2): 701-736
3.
Eichel, L. and C. Zukin ( 2009) ‘Residents See Crime As Top Problem Facing Philadelphia: But They Still See a Lot to Like About Their City’ , Report from Philadelphia Research Initiative, Pew Charitable Trusts, Philadelphia.
4.
Fagan, J. and G. Davies ( 2000) ‘Street Stops and Broken Windows: Terry, Race, and Disorder in New York City’ , Fordham Urban Law Journal28:457-504.
5.
Gambacorta, D. ( 2009) ‘Homicides, Shootings up Over Last Year’ , Philadelphia Daily News March 17, p. 6 .
6.
Gelman, A. , J. Fagan and A. Kiss ( 2005) ‘An Analysis of the NYPD’s Policy of Stop and Frisk in the Context of Claims of Racial Bias’. Unpublished research report. New York: Columbia School of Law.
7.
Gladwell, M. ( 2000) The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference . Boston, MA: Back Bay Books.
8.
Hinds, L. ( 2009) ‘Public Satisfaction with the Police: The Influence of General Attitudes and Police-Citizen Encounters’ , International Journal of Police Science and Management11(1): 54-66.
9.
Hough, M. ( 2007) ‘Policing, New Public Management, and Legitimacy in Britain’, in T. R. Tyler (ed.) Legitimacy and Criminal Justice, pp.63-83. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
10.
Kuhn, T. ( 1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Mulholland, J. ( 2009) ‘The Public are Fast Losing Patience with Thuggish Policing’ , Observer, April 19.
12.
Murphy, K. , L. Hinds and J..Fleming ( 2008) ‘Encouraging Public Cooperation and Support for Police’ , Policing and Society18(2): 136-155.
13.
Ott, D. ( 2009) ‘Philadelphia Anti-crime Drive Brings Agencies Together’ , Philadelphia Inquirer, April 8, B1 .
14.
Powell, M. ( 2009) ‘Police Polish Image, but Concerns Persist’ , New York Times, January 3, A1 , B4 .
15.
Sampson, R.J. and D.J. Bartusch ( 1998) ‘Legal Cynicism and (Subcultural?) Tolerance of Deviance: The Neighborhood Context of Racial Differences’ , Law and Society Review32:777-804.
16.
Shaw, J. ( 1995) ‘Community Policing Against Guns: Public Opinion of the Kansas City Gun Experiment’ , Justice Quarterly12(4): 695-710.
17.
Sherman, L.W. ( 2007) ‘Philadelphia’s Journey in the Fight Against Crime’ , Daily Pennsylvanian, December 11, p. 14 .
18.
Sherman, L.W.(2009) ‘Evidence and Liberty: The Promise of Experimental Criminology’ , Criminology and Criminal Justice9(1): 5-28.
19.
Sherman, L.W. and D.P. Rogan ( 1995) ‘Effects of Gun Seizures on Gun Violence: "Hot Spots" Control in Kansas City’ , Justice Quarterly12(4): 673-694.
20.
Sunshine, J. and T.R. Tyler. ( 2003) ‘The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for the Police’ , Law and Society Review37: 513-547.
21.
Tyler, T.R. ( 2002) ‘A National Survey for Monitoring Police Legitimacy’ , Justice Research and Policy4 (Special Issue):71-86.
22.
Tyler, T.R. and Y.J. Huo ( 2002) Trust in the Law. New York: Russell Sage.
23.
Young, A. ( 2009) ‘Gang Leader for a Day: Griot for Life’ , Sociological Forum24(1): 210-214.
24.
Terry v. Ohio (1968). 392 U.S. 1. U.S. Supreme Court.
