In the criminal justice arena, the convergence of analyses of `actuarial justice' and the `risk society' thesis, has led many to assume that we will experience a global shift towards risk-based models of justice that are statistical, repressive and incapacitating. It is argued in this article that even where we focus on national jurisdictions sharing risk frameworks of justice and the adoption of neo-liberal politics, there is little evidence that actuarial justice has been successfully exported from the USA. By examining recent developments in Australia, it is shown that local political formations and social conditions have meant that models of justice that are both neo-liberal and risk-based in character diverge so much from US models—in form and function—that we cannot make useful global generalizations about the political character or correctional value of such regimes, or about their simple `transportability' across jurisdictional boundaries.
Austin, J., J. Clark, P. Hardyman and D. Henry (1999) `The Impact of “Three Strikes and You're Out”', Punishment and Society1(2): 131—62.
2.
Baumann, Z. (2000) `Social Issues of Law and Order', British Journal of Criminology40(2): 205—21.
3.
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society. New York: Sage.
4.
Beck, U. (1997) World Risk Society. London: Polity Press.
5.
Broadhead, R. (1991) `Social Constructions of Bleach in Combatting AIDS among Injection Drug Users', The Journal of Drug Issues21(4): 713—37.
6.
Castel, R. (1991) `From Dangerousness to Risk', in G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds) The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentality, pp. 281—98. London : Harvester/Wheatsheaf.
7.
Clarke, J., S. Gewirtz and E. McLaughlen (2000) `Reinventing the Welfare State', in J. Clarke, S. Gewirtz and E. McLaughlen (eds) New Managerialism, New Welfare?, pp. 1—26. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
8.
Dean, M. (1995) `Governing the Unemployed Self in an Active Society ', Economy and Society24(4): 559—83.
9.
DPEC (Drug Policy Expert Committee) (2000) Drugs: Responding to the Issues, Engaging the Community. Melbourne: Government Printer.
10.
DSEV (Directorate of School Education, Victoria) (1995) Get Real. A Harm Minimisation Approach to Drug Education. Melbourne: Directorate of School Education.
11.
Ericson, R. and K. Haggerty (1998) Policing the Risk Society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
12.
Ewald, F. (1991) `Insurance and Risks', in G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, pp. 197—210. London: Harvester/Wheatsheaf .
13.
Feeley, M. and J. Simon (1992) `The New Penology. Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and its Implications', Criminology30(4): 449—70.
14.
Feeley, M. and J. Simon (1994) `Actuarial Justice. The Emerging New Criminal Law ', in D. Nelken (ed.) The Futures of Criminology, pp. 173—201. London: Sage.
15.
Felson, M. and R. Clarke (1997) `The Ethics of Situational Crime Prevention', in G. Newman et al. (eds) Rational Choice and Situational Crime Prevention, Theoretical Foundations, pp. 197—217. Aldershot: Ashgate.
16.
Freiberg, A. (2000) `Guerillas in Our Midst? Judicial Responses to Governing the Dangerous', in M. Brown and J. Pratt (eds) Dangerous Offenders. Punishment and Social Order, pp. 51—70. London: Routledge.
17.
Garland, D. (1985) Punishment and Welfare. Aldershot : Gower.
18.
Garland, D. (1996) `The Limits of the Sovereign State', British Journal of Criminology36(4): 445—71.
19.
Garland, D. (2001) The Culture of Control. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
20.
HCS (Victorian Government Department of Health and Community Services) (1993) Victorian Drug Strategy: 1993—1998 . Melbourne: Health and Community Service, Promotions and Media Unit.
21.
Hebenton, B. and T. Thomas (1996) `Sexual Offenders in the Community: Reflections of Problems of Law, Community and Risk Management in the USA, England and Wales', International Journal of the Sociology of Law24(4): 427—43.
22.
Hudson, B. (2000) `Punishment, Rights and Difference', in K. Stenson and R. Sullivan (eds) Crime, Risk and Justice, pp. 144—72. Exeter: Willan.
23.
Kempf-Leonard, K. and E. Peterson (2000) `Expanding Realms of the New Penology. The Advent of Actuarial Justice for Juveniles', Punishment and Society2(1): 66—97.
24.
Kemshall, H. (1998) Risk in Probation Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
25.
Levi, R. (2000) `The Mutual Constitution of Risk and Community ', Economy and Society29(4): 578—601.
26.
Melossi, D. (forthcoming) `The Cultural Embeddedness of Social Control. Reflections on the Comparison of Italian and North American Cultures Concerning Punishment ', Theoretical Criminology.
27.
Miller, L. (2001) `Looking for Postmodernism in all the Wrong Places. Implementing a New Penology', British Journal of Criminology41(1): 168—84.
28.
Mugford, S. (1993) `Social Change and the Control of Psychotropic Drugs— Risk Management, Harm Reduction and “Postmodernity”', Drug and Alcohol Review12(4): 369—75.
29.
National Crime Prevention (1999a) Pathways to Prevention. Canberra: National Anti-Crime Strategy.
30.
National Crime Prevention (1999b) Hanging Out. Negotiating Young People's Use of Public Space. Canberra: National Anti-Crime Strategy.
31.
Nolan, J. (1998) The Therapeutic State. Justifying Government at Century's End. New York: New York University Press.
32.
O'Malley, P. (1992) `Risk, Power and Crime Prevention', Economy and Society21(3): 252—75.
33.
O'Malley, P. (1996) `Risk and Responsibility', in A. Osborne, T. Barry and N. Rose (eds) Foucault and Political Reason, pp. 189—208. London: UCL Press/ Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
O'Malley, P. (1999a) `Consuming Risks. Harm Minimisation and the Government of “Drug Users”', in R. Smandych (ed.) Governable Places. Readings in Governmentality and Crime Control, pp. 191—214. Advances in Criminology Series. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
35.
O'Malley, P. (1999b) `Volatile and Contradictory Punishment', TheoreticalCriminology3(2): 175—96.
36.
O'Malley, P. (2000) `Risk, Crime and Prudentialism Revisited', in K. Stenson and R. Sullivan (eds) Risk, Crime and Justice , pp. 89—103. London: Willan.
37.
O'Malley, P. and S. Mugford (1992) `Moral Technology. The Political Agenda of Random Drug Testing', Social Justice18(4): 122—46.
38.
Pratt, J. (1998) Governing the Dangerous. Sydney : Federation Press.
39.
Pratt, J. (2000) `Emotive and Ostentatious Punishment. Its Decline and Resurgence in Modern Society', Punishment and Society2(4): 417—39.
40.
Rand Corporation (1998) Diverting Children from a Life of Crime. Washington, DC: Rand Corporation.
41.
Reiner, R. (1992) `Policing a Postmodern Society', The Modern Law Review55(6): 762—81.
42.
Roche, D. (1999) `Mandatory Sentencing', Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice No. 138. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
43.
Rose, N. (1996) `Governing Advanced Liberal Democracies', in A. Barry, T. Osborne and N. Rose (eds) Foucault and Political Reason, pp. 37—64. London: UCL Press.
44.
Rose, N. (2000) `Government and Control', British Journal of Criminology40(2): 321—39.
45.
Rosenbaum, M. (1997) `The De-medicalization of Methadone Maintenance ', in P.G. Erickson (ed.) Harm Reduction: A New Direction for Drug Policies and Programs, pp. 97—112. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
46.
Shearing, C. (1995) `Reinventing Policing. Policing as Governance', in Privatisierungstaatliche Kontrolle: Befunde, Konzepte, Tendenzen. Baden Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
47.
Simon, J. (1987) `The Emergence of a Risk Society: Insurance, Law, and the State', Socialist Review95: 61—89.
48.
Simon, J. (1998) `Managing the Monstrous. Sex Offenders and the New Penology', Psychology, Public Policy and Law4: 453—67.
49.
Stanko, E. (1996) `Warnings to Women. Police Advice and Women's Safety in Britain', Violence Against Women2(1): 5—24.
