Hallin and Mancini's Comparing Media Systems has provided Mass Communication research with valuable tools to compare media settings from a transnational viewpoint. However, most recent contributions around media systems theory focus on suggesting new dimensions or variables to update the three models presented in the authors’ book, leaving behind the discussion concerning the factors galvanizing the transformation processes. We then ask: What factors explain the transformation of media systems? Through a literature review and the discussion of an extensive array of examples from different countries, our essay formulates new insights to refine a crucial concept in media studies. We examine material, institutional, and cultural logics of change to point out how the described transformations might unfold at different paces in particular social systems. By resorting to the idea of “critical junctures,” our essay illustrates how supposedly isolated shifts in the media systems can have unexpected impacts.
AalbergTVan AelstPCurranJ (2010) Media systems and the political information environment: A cross-national comparison. The International Journal of Press/Politics15(3): 255–271.
2.
AbernathyP (2018) The Expanding News Desert. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
3.
AlbuquerqueA (2018) Political parallelism. In: ÖrnebringH (Org.). The Oxford Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.1338–1351.
4.
AlencarADeuzeM (2017) News for assimilation or integration? Examining the functions of news in shaping acculturation experiences of immigrants in the Netherlands and Spain. European Journal of Communication32(2): 151–166.
5.
AllernSBlach-ØrstenM (2011) The news media as a political institution: A Scandinavian perspective. Journalism Studies12(1): 92–105.
6.
AlmondG (1956) Comparative political systems. The Journal of Politics18(3): 391–409.
7.
AndersonCW (2011) Between creative and quantified audiences: Web metrics and changing patterns of newswork in local US newsrooms. Journalism12(5): 550–566.
8.
AnderssonUWiikJ (2013) Journalism meets management: Changing leadership in Swedish news organizations. Journalism Practice7(6): 705–719.
9.
ArtemasKVosTPDuffyM (2018) Journalism hits a wall: Rhetorical construction of newspapers’ editorial and advertising relationship. Journalism Studies19(7): 1004–1020.
10.
AthiqueA (2017) Transnational Audiences: Media Reception on a Global Scale. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
11.
AufderheideP (1996) Public service broadcasting in the United States. Journal of Media Economics9(1): 63–76.
12.
BalcytieneA (2012) Culture as a guide in theoretical explorations of Baltic media. In: HallinDManciniP (eds). Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp.51–71.
13.
BennettWLPfetschB (2018) Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheres. Journal of Communication68(2): 243–253.
14.
BergerG (2009) How the internet impacts on international news: Exploring paradoxes of the most global Medium in a time of ‘hyperlocalism’. International Communication Gazette71(5): 355–371.
15.
BlumlerJGurevitchM (1995) The Crisis of Public Communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
BourdieuP (2005) The political field, the social science field, and the journalistic field. In: BensonRNeveuE (eds) Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp.29–47.
17.
BruggemannMEngesserSBuchelF, et al. (2014) Hallin and Mancini revisited: Four empirical types of Western media systems. Journal of Communication64(6): 1037–1065.
18.
CapocciaG (2015) Critical junctures and institutional change. In: MahoneyJThelenK (eds) Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.147–179.
19.
CarpenterSBoehmerJFicoF (2016) The measurement of journalistic role enactments: A study of organizational constraints and support in for-profit and nonprofit journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly93(3): 587–608.
20.
ChadwickA (2017) The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
ChakravarttyPRoyS (2013) Media pluralism redux: Towards new frameworks of comparative media studies “beyond the west”. Political Communication30: 349–370.
22.
ChalabyJK (2005) From internationalization to transnationalization. Global Media and Communication1(1): 28–33.
23.
ChoiH (2022) How partisan cable news mobilizes viewers: Partisan media, discussion networks and political participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 66(1): 129–152. DOI: 10.1080/08838151.2021.2013220.
24.
CurranJEsserFHallinD, et al. (2017) International news and global integration: A five-nation reappraisal. Journalism Studies18(2): 118–134.
25.
DeuzeMWitschgeT (2017) Beyond journalism: Theorizing the transformation of journalism. Journalism19: 165–181.
26.
DuvergerM (1959) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Metheun & Co. Ltd.
27.
EdelmanM (1988) Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
EsserFUmbrichtA (2013) Competing models of journalism? Political affairs coverage in US, British, German, Swiss, French and Italian newspapers. Journalism14(8): 89–107.
29.
FletcherRNielsenR (2017) Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? A cross-national comparative analysis of cross-platform news audience fragmentation and duplication. Journal of Communication67(4): 476–498.
30.
FletcherRCorniaANielsenR (2020) How polarized are online and offline news audiences? A comparative analysis of twelve countries. The International Journal of Press/Politics25(2): 169–195.
31.
FlewTWaisbordS (2015) The ongoing significance of national media systems in the context of media globalization. Media, Culture & Society37(4): 620–636.
32.
FontesGMarquesFPJ (2022) Defending democracy or amplifying populism? Journalistic coverage, Twitter, and users’ engagement in Bolsonaro’s Brazil. Journalism 1–23. DOI: 10.1177/14648849221075429.
33.
GollmitzerM (2014) Precariously employed watchdogs? Perceptions of working conditions among freelancers and interns. Journalism Practice8(6): 826–841.
34.
GarnhamN (2011) The political economy of communication revisited. In: WaskoJMurdockGSousaH (eds) The Handbook of Political Economy of Communications. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, pp.41–61.
35.
GuerreroM (2014) The ‘captured liberal’ model of media systems in Latin America. In: GuerreroMMárquez-RamírezM (eds) Media Systems and Communication Policies in Latin America. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.43–65.
36.
HallinD (2015) Media system. In: MazzoleniGBarnhurstKIkedaKMaiaRWesslerH (eds) The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp.1–10.
37.
HallinD (2020) Comparative Media studies in the digital age: Comparative research, system change, and the complexity of Media systems. International Journal of Communication14: 12.
38.
HallinDManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
39.
HallinDManciniP (eds) (2012) Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
40.
HallinDManciniP (2017) Ten years after comparing Media systems: What have we learned?Political Communication34(2): 155–171.
41.
HallinDMelladoCManciniP (2023) The concept of hybridity in journalism studies. The International Journal of Press/Politics28(1): 219–237.
42.
HeftAAlfterBPfetschB (2019) Transnational journalism networks as drivers of europeanisation. Journalism20(9): 1183–1202.
43.
Hellmueller L (2015) Journalists’ truth justification in a transnational news environment. In Vos TP and Heinderyckx F (eds) Gatekeeping in Transition. New York: Routledge, pp.47–64.
44.
HellmuellerL (2017) Gatekeeping beyond geographical borders: Developing an analytical model of transnational journalism cultures. International Communication Gazette79(1): 3–25.
45.
HumphreysP (2011) A political scientist’s contribution to the comparative study of media systems in Europe: A response to Hallin and Mancini. In: JustNPuppisM (eds) Trends in Communication Policy Research. Bristol: Intellect, pp.141–158.
46.
HumprechtECastro HerreroLBlassnigS, et al. (2022) Media systems in the digital age: An empirical comparison of 30 countries. Journal of Communication72(2): 145–164.
47.
Iyengar S and Hahn KS (2009) Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication 59(1): 19–39.
48.
JenkinsJGravesL (2022) Do more with less: Minimizing competitive tensions in collaborative local journalism. Digital Journalism. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2022.2026237.
49.
JosephiBO’DonnellP (2023) The blurring line between freelance journalists and self-employed media workers. Journalism24(1): 139–156. DOI: 10.1177/14648849221086806.
50.
JungJ (2003) The bigger, the better? Measuring the financial health of media firms. International Journal on Media Management5(4): 237–250.
51.
KiriyaI (2019) New and old institutions within the Russian media system. Russian Journal of Communication11(1): 6–21.
52.
KitscheltHLangePMarksG, et al. (eds) (1999). Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
53.
KitzbergerP (2016) Media wars and the new left: Governability and media democratisation in Argentina and Brazil. Journal of Latin American Studies48(3): 447–476.
54.
KrasnowEGLongleyLDTerryHA (1982) The Politics of Broadcast Regulation, 3rd ed.New York: St. Martin’s Press.
55.
Levendusky M (2013) How Partisan Media Polarize America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
LijphartA (1977) Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
57.
LlorensCCostacheA (2014) European Union media policy and independent regulatory authorities: A new tool to protect European media pluralism?Journal of Information Policy4: 396–420.
58.
LuleJ (2002) Myth and terror on the editorial page: The New York Times responds to September 11, 2001. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly79(2): 275–293.
59.
LynchM (2015) After the Arab Spring: How the media trashed the transitions. Journal of Democracy26(4): 90–99.
60.
McCargoD (2012) Partisan polyvalence. In: HallinDManciniP (eds) Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp.201–223.
61.
McNairB (2006) Cultural Chaos: Journalism and Power in a Globalised World. London: Routledge.
62.
McQuailD (2005) Mass Communication Theory. London: Sage.
63.
MahnerMBungeM (2001) Function and functionalism: A synthetic perspective. Philosophy of Science68: 75–94.
64.
MahoneyJMohamedaliKNguyenC (2016) Causality and time in historical institutionalism. In: FioretosOFalletiTSheingateA (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.71–88.
65.
MarquesFPJ (2023) Populism and Critical Incidents in Journalism: Has Bolsonaro Disrupted the Mainstream Press in Brazil?The International Journal of Press/Politics 0(0): 1–22. DOI: 10.1177/19401612231153110.
66.
MarquesFPJMiolaE (2021) Key concepts, dilemmas, and trends in political communication: A literature review considering the Brazilian landscape. Annals of the International Communication Association45(2): 95–112.
67.
MattoniACeccobelliD (2018) Comparing hybrid media systems in the digital age: A theoretical framework for analysis. European Journal of Communication33(5): 540–557.
68.
MeierH (2008) Independent regulatory bodies and impossible jobs: The failure of German public service broadcasting regulation. Public Administration86(1): 133–148.
69.
Nechushtai E (2018) From liberal to polarized liberal? Contemporary US news in Hallin and Mancini's typology of news systems. The International Journal of Press/Politics 23(2): 183–201.
70.
MungerK (2020) All the news that’s fit to click: The economics of clickbait media. Political Communication37(3): 376–397.
71.
NewmanNFletcherRSchulzA, et al. (2021) Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021.
72.
NorrisP (1997) Choosing electoral systems: Proportional, majoritarian and mixed systems. International Political Science Review18(3): 297–312.
73.
NorrisP (2009) Comparative political communications: Common frameworks or Babelian confusion?Government and Opposition44(3): 321–340.
74.
NygrenGStigbrandK (2014) The formation of a professional identity: Journalism students in different media systems. Journalism Studies15(6): 841–858.
75.
ParsonsC (2007) How to Map Arguments in Political Science. New York: Oxford Press.
76.
Pérez-LiñánA (2007) Presidential Impeachment and the New Political Instability in Latin America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
77.
PeriY (2012) The impact of national security on the development of media systems. In: HallinDManciniP (eds) Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp.11–25.
78.
PiersonP (2004) Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
79.
PimentelPMarquesFPJ (2021) De-westernizing media parallelism: How editorial interests unfold during impeachment crises. Journalism Studies22(3): 282–304.
80.
PortoM (2010) The changing landscape of Brazil’s news media. In: LevyDNielsenR (eds) The Changing Business of Journalism and its Implications for Democracy. Oxford: University of Oxford, pp.107–124.
81.
ReeseS (2020) The Crisis of the Institutional Press. Cambridge: Polity Press.
82.
RobinsonSDeShanoC (2011) ‘Anyone can know’: Citizen journalism and the interpretive community of the mainstream press. Journalism12(8): 963–982.
83.
Rolland A (2009) A clash of media systems? British mecom's takeover of Norwegian Orkla media. International Communication Gazette 71(4): 263–281.
84.
RoudakovaN (2011) Comparing processes: Media, “transitions,” and historical change. In: HallinDManciniP (eds) Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.246–277.
85.
RyanK (2009) The performative journalist: Job satisfaction, temporary workers and American television news. Journalism10(5): 647–664.
86.
SchudsonM (1978) Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers. New York, NY: Basic Books.
87.
Seymour-UreC (1974) The Political Impact of Mass Media. London: Constable.
88.
ShoemakerPJReeseSD (1996) Mediating the Message. White Plains, NY: Longman.
89.
SiebertFPetersonTSchrammW (1956) Four Theories of the Press. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
ThorsonKMedeirosMCotterK, et al. (2020) Platform civics: Facebook in the local information infrastructure. Digital Journalism8(10): 1231–1257.
92.
TuckerJAGuessABarberaP, et al. (2018) Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3144139.
93.
UsherN (2021) News for the Rich, White, and Blue: How Place and Power Distort American Journalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
94.
Van AelstPStrömbäckJAalbergT, et al. (2017) Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy?Annals of the International Communication Association41(1): 3–27.
95.
VartanovaE (2012) The Russia media model in the context of post-soviet dynamics. In: HallinDManciniP (eds) Comparing Media Systems Beyond Western World. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp.119–142.
96.
VoltmerKSelvikKHøigiltJ (2021) Hybrid media and hybrid politics: Contesting informational uncertainty in Lebanon and Tunisia. The International Journal of Press/Politics26(4): 842–860.
97.
VosTPFerrucciP (2018) Who am I? Perceptions of digital journalists’ professional identity. In Franklin B and Eldridge SA (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Developments in Digital Journalism Studies. New York: Routledge, pp.62–74.
98.
VosTPPerreaultG (2020) The discursive construction of the gamification of journalism. Convergence26(3): 470–485.
99.
VosTPRussellFM (2019) Theorizing journalism’s institutional relationships: An elaboration of gatekeeping theory. Journalism Studies20(16): 2331–2348.
100.
WagnerMCollinsTP (2014) Does ownership matter? The case of Rupert Murdoch’s purchase of The Wall Street Journal. Journalism Practice8(6): 758–771.
101.
WaisbordS (2018) Truth is what happens to news: On journalism, fake news, and post-truth. Journalism Studies19(13): 1866–1878.
YoungS (2017) News corporation tabloids and press photography during the 2013 Australian federal election. Journalism Studies18(7): 866–889.
104.
ZhaoY (2012) Understanding China’s media system in a world historical context. In: HallinDManciniP (eds) Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.143–174.
