Media convergence for US–China competition? Comparative case studies of China Media Group and the US Agency for Global Media

Abstract

The present study provides a comparative analysis of the media convergence of China Media Group and US Agency for Global Media to illustrate the increasing US–China rivalry in international communication. It yields the following tentative findings: Both have been undergoing rigorous development at the technological and operational levels of convergence to enhance international communication; both are made to show more explicit loyalty to its official ideology, and both have become more monolithic via convergence; both have integrated their broadcasting services for an increasingly integrated market of information and news; both seem to be weaponizing itself against each other to fuel rivalry in international communication between the two nations rather than deepening mutual understanding and cooperation for mutual good and global good. The two case studies reveal that media convergence has not been able to liberate journalism from nationalistic constraints and transform it into an instrument to spawn new ideas and disseminate high-quality information and news for global public good.

Keywords

Media convergence China Media Group US Agency for Global Media comparative perspective

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albro

(2015) The disjunction of image and word in US and Chinese soft power projection. International Journal of Cultural Policy 21(4): 382–399.

Baxter

Jack

(2008) Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report 13: 544–559.

Bayles

Gedmin

(2020) It’s not broke! And you’re not fixing it! Online resource, available at: https://www.the-american-interest.com/2020/06/18/its-not-broke-and-youre-not-fixing-it/?utm-access=mbayles. Last access: 2021-12-09.

Borger

(2020) Trump administration steps up efforts to turn broadcasters into propaganda outlets. Online resource, available at: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/aug/14/trump-administration-steps-up-efforts-to-turn-broadcasters-into-propaganda-outlets. Last access: 2021-12-09.

CGTN (2018) China media group inaugurates in Beijing. Online resource, available at: https://news.cgtn.com/news/314d544e356b7a6333566d54/share_p.html. Last access: 2021-11-10.

Chan-Olmsted

(1998) Mergers, acquisitions, and convergence: The strategic alliances of broadcasting, cable television, and telephone services. Journal of Media Economics 11(3): 33–46.

Chon

Choi

Barnett

, et al. (2003) A structural analysis of media convergence: Cross-industry mergers and acquisitions in the information industries. The Journal of Media Economics 16(3): 141–157.

Cottle

Ashton

(1999) From BBC newsroom to BBC news center: On changing technology and journalist practices. Convergence 5(3): 22–43.

Cowan

Glassman

(2020) Op-Ed: Trump’s war on Voice of America is all about him – as usual. Online resource, available at: https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-04-22/trump-attack-voice-of-america-is-plain-ignorant. Last access: 2021-11-10.

10.

CTR insight (2021) 2020 Annual reports of mainstream media convergence communication effects (in Chinese). Online resource, available at: https://news.cctv.com/2021/02/02/ARTIKPTyquTYK3toUljM56j4210202.shtml. Last access: 2022-06-05.

11.

Cull

(2008) Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616(1): 31–54.

12.

Cull

(2022) From soft power to reputational security: Rethinking public diplomacy and cultural diplomacy for a dangerous age. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 18: 18–21.

13.

Dailey

Demo

Spillman

(2005) The convergence continuum: A model for studying collaboration between media newsrooms. Atlantic Journal of Communication 13(3): 150–168.

14.

de Certeau

(1984) The Practice of Everyday Life, trans. by Rendall S. Berkeley: University of California Press.

15.

Deng

Yang

(2021) Cross-platform comparative study of public concern on social media during the COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical study based on Twitter and Weibo. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(12): 6487.

16.

Ding

(2011) Media convergence: Concepts, cause, benefits, and harms (in Chinese). Nanjing Social Sciences 289(11): 92–99.

17.

Entman

(2004) Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

18.

Erdal

(2007) Researching media convergence and cross media news production: Mapping the field. Nordicom Review 28(2): 51–61.

19.

Erdal

(2011) Coming to terms with convergence journalism: Cross-media as a theoretical and analytical concept. Convergence 17(2): 213–223.

20.

Gallo

(2022) On Asia trip, Biden takes tough stance on China. VOA. Online resource, available at: https://www.voanews.com/a/on-asia-trip-biden-takes-tough-stance-on-china/6585339.html. Last access: 2022-05-23.

21.

García Avilés JA, Meier K, Kaltenbrunner A, et al. (2009) Newsroom integration in Austria, Spain and Germany: Models of media convergence. Journalism Practice 3(3): 285–303.

22.

García-Avilés

Kaltenbrunner

Meier

(2014) Media convergence revisited: Lessons learned on newsroom integration in Austria, Germany and Spain. Journalism Practice 8(5): 573–584.

23.

George

(2019) Case studies and theory development: The method of structured, focused comparison. In: Alexander L. George: A Pioneer in Political and Social Sciences. Cham: Springer, pp. 191–214.

24.

Gilboa

(2008) Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616(1): 55–77.

25.

Gordon

(2003) The meanings and implications of convergence. In: Kawamoto

(ed) Digital Journalism: Emerging Media and the Changing Horizons of Journalism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 57–74.

26.

Hayden

(2013) Logics of narrative and networks in US public diplomacy: Communication power and US strategic engagement. Journal of International Communication 19(2): 196–218.

27.

Huang

Heider

(2007) Media convergence: A case study of a cable news station. The International Journal on Media Management 9(3): 105–115.

28.

Huang

Wang

(2019) Building a network to “tell China stories well”: Chinese diplomatic communication strategies on Twitter. International Journal of Communication 13: 24.

29.

Huang

Davison

Shreve

, et al. (2006) Facing the challenges of convergence: Media professionals’ concerns of working across media platforms. Convergence 12(1): 83–98.

30.

Hughes

(2002) China And the globalization of ICTs: Implications for international relations. New Media & Society 4(2): 205–224.

31.

Jenkins

(2004) The cultural logic of media convergence. International Journal of Cultural Studies 7(1): 33–43.

32.

Jia

(2018) VOC should be more than just Voice of China. Online resource, available at https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201803/28/WS5abadef2a3105cdcf6514b0b.html. Last access: 2021-08-11.

33.

Jia

(2020) Public diplomacy networks: China’s public diplomacy communication practices in twitter during two sessions. Public Relations Review 46(1): 101818.

34.

Jiang

(2019) President Xi Jinping gave important speech on the Political Bureau of the Central Committee of the CPC 12th collective study (in Chinese). Online resource, available at: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-01/25/content_5361197.htm. Last access: 2021-12-23.

35.

Knight

(2001) Human-environment relationship: Comparative case studies. In: Smelser

Baltes

(eds) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Oxford, UK: Pergamon, pp. 7039–7045.

36.

Kolodzy

(2009) Convergence explained. In: Grant

Wilkson

(eds) Understanding Media Convergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 31–51.

37.

Laura

(2020) Trump’s new head of US media agency under fire from both sides. Online resource, available at: https://thehill.com/policy/international/503676-trump-pick-to-lead-us-media-agency-under-fire-from-both-sides. Last access: 2021-08-11.

38.

(2018) ‘See the difference’: What difference? The new missions of Chinese international communication. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 13: 41–47.

39.

Liu

Chan-Olmsted

(2003) Partnerships between the old and the new: Examining the strategic alliances between broadcast television networks and internet firms in the context of convergence. International Journal on Media Management 5(1): 47–56.

40.

National Endowment for Democracy (2017) Sharp power-rising authoritarian influence: New forum report. Online resource, retrieved from: https://www.ned.org/sharp-power-rising-authoritarian-influence-forum-report/. Last access: 2021-10-18.

41.

Nilsson

Nuldén

Olsson

(2001) Mobile media: The convergence of media and mobile communications. Convergence 7(1): 34–38.

42.

Nip

Sun

(2018) China’s news media tweeting, competing with US sources. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 13(1): 98–122.

43.

Ooi

D’Arcangelis

(2017) Framing China: Discourses of othering in US news and political rhetoric. Global Media and China 2(3–4): 269–283.

44.

Quinn

(2004) An intersection of ideals: Journalism, profits, technology and convergence. Convergence 10(4): 109–123.

45.

Rawnsley

(2015) To know us is to love us: Public diplomacy and international broadcasting in contemporary Russia and China. Politics 35(3-4): 273–286.

46.

Servaes

(2012) Soft power and public diplomacy: The new frontier for public relations and international communication between the US and China. Public Relations Review, 38(5): 643–651.

47.

Stakem

(1995) The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

48.

Sullivan

Jiang

(2010) Media convergence and the impact of the internet on the M&A activity of large media companies. Journal of Media Business Studies 7(4): 21–40.

49.

Sun

(2015) Slow boat from China: Public discourses behind the ‘going global’ media policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy 21(4): 400–418.

50.

Syvertsen

(2003) Challenges to public television in the era of convergence and commercialization. Television & New Media 4(2): 155–175.

51.

U.S. Agency of Global Media (2020a) Who we are. Online resource, available at: https://www.usagm.gov/who-we-are/. Last access: 2021-11-10.

52.

U.S. Agency of Global Media (2020b) VOA Charter. Online resource, available at: https://www.usagm.gov/networks/voa/. Last access: 2021-11-10.

53.

VOA History (2017) VOA Through the Years. VOA. Available at: https://www.insidevoa.com/a/3794247.html. Last access: 2021-11-10.

54.

Wei

Golan

(2017) Examining the relationship between presumed influence of US news about China and the support for the Chinese government’s global public relations campaigns. International Journal of Communication 11: 18.

55.

Welna

(2020) Purge ff senior officials at foreign broadcast agency stirs fear and outrage. Online resource, available at: https://www.npr.org/2020/08/15/902735007/purge-of-senior-officials-at-foreign-broadcast-agency-stirs-fear-and-outrage. Last access: 2021-11-13.

56.

White House (2017) National security strategy. Online resource, available at: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf. Last access: 2021-12-23.

57.

White House (2021) Summit for democracy summary of proceedings. Online resource, available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/12/23/summit-for-democracy-summary-of-proceedings/. Last access: 2021-12-23.

58.

White House Foreign Policy (2020) Amid a pandemic, Voice of America spends your money to promote foreign propaganda. Online resource, available at: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/articles/amid-a-pandemic-voice-of-america-spends-your-money-to-promote-foreign-propaganda/. Last access: 2021-12-23.

59.

Widakuswara

(2020) Trump’s VOA criticism shows US-funded news doesn't mean US-approved. Online resource, available at: https://www.voanews.com/press-freedom/trumps-voa-criticism-shows-us-funded-news-doesnt-mean-us-approved. Last access: 2021-12-23.

60.

Widakuswara

(2022a) Biden ends Asia trip with warning seen as signal to China. Online resource, available at https://www.voanews.com/a/biden-uses-ukraine-crisis-to-warn-china-/6586785.html. Last access: 2022-05-24.

61.

Widakuswara

(2022b) Biden ends Asia trip with warning to China. Online resource, available at: https://www.voanews.com/a/biden-ends-asia-trip-with-warning-to-china/6588524.html. Last access: 2022-06-14.

62.

Widakuswara

(2022c) What to expect from Biden’s trip to Asia. VOA. Online resource, available at: https://www.voanews.com/a/what-to-expect-from-biden-s-trip-to-asia-/6580140.html. Last access: 2022-06-14.

63.

Winseck

(2017) The geopolitical economy of the global internet infrastructure. Journal of Information Policy 7: 228–267.

64.

Wong

(2020) U.S. designates four more Chinese news organizations as foreign missions. Online resource, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/22/us/politics/us-china-news-organizations.html. Last access: 2021-12-23.

65.

Xinwen Lianbo (2014) Instructions about promoting media convergence of traditional media and new media (in Chinese). Online resource, available at: http://www.wenming.cn/syjj/sp_syjj/201408/t20140821_2133098.shtml. Last access: 2021-11-29.

66.

Xiong

(2013) Coexist, complement, converge, and innovate: Public diplomacy of US–China internet industry forum. Telematics and Informatics 30(4): 331–334.

67.

Yin

(2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

68.

Yin

Liu

(2014) A gesture of compliance: Media convergence in China. Media, Culture & Society 36(5): 561–577.

69.

Zhang

(2012) The newsroom of the future: Newsroom convergence models in China. Journalism Practice 6(5-6): 776–787.

70.

Zhao

(2020) How China’s state actors create a “Us vs US” world during covid-19 pandemic on social media. Media and Communication 8: 452.

71.

Zhong

(2013) Public diplomacy meets social media: A study of the US Embassy’s blogs and micro-blogs. Public Relations Review 39(5): 542–548.