Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Most protest paradigm studies examining news media's portrayals of protesters are based on an assumption that the way the paradigm operates within the U.S. media system is similar around the globe. To overcome these weaknesses, this content analysis (n = 1200) of protest-related news coverage in two Balkan and two Central American countries examines how media clientelism-manifested via ownership, concentration, and state advertising-influences media representations of protesters. Results highlight important regional differences in protest coverage, and confirm the role of government and elites in clientelist environments is more complex than hypothesized. We found that while clientelism contributes to the protest paradigm, delegitimizing coverage is not automatic, and varies by frame and media ownership, as political and economic interests differentially influence protest coverage depending not just on the outlets’ ties to the state, but also the social contexts surrounding the protests themselves.

Keywords

Central America comparative research media clientelism protest coverage protest paradigm Southeast Europe

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alpírez

(2015) El mercado de la publicidad oficial que administró Francisco Cuevas. Plaza Pública . Available at: https://www.plazapublica.com.gt/content/el-mercado-de-la-publicidad-oficial-que-administro-francisco-cuevas.

Anti-Corruption Council (2011) Izveštaj o pritiscima i kontroli medija u Srbiji [Report on the pressures and control of the media in Serbia], No. 07-00-6614/2011-01. Available at: http://www.antikorupcija-savet.gov.rs/Storage/Global/Documents/mediji/IZVESTAJ%20O%20MEDIJIMA,%20PRECISCENA%20VERZIJA.pdf.

Anti-Corruption Council (2015) Izveštaj o vlasničkoj strukturi i kontroli medija u Srbiji [Report on ownership structure and control of the media in Serbia], No. 345-00-1829/2015. Available at: http://www.antikorupcija-savet.gov.rs/izvestaji/cid1028-2751/izvestaj-o-vlasnickoj-strukturi-i-kontroli-medija-u-srbiji.

ARPAS (2019) ‘Bukele entrega pauta publicitaria a ‘los mismos (medios) de siempre’: TCS recibe la mayor tajada. Available at: https://arpas.org.sv/2019/09/bukele-entrega-pauta-publicitaria-a-los-mismos-medios-de-siempre-tcs-recibe-la-mayor-tajada/.

Benson

(2013) Shaping Immigration News: A French-American Comparison. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Benson

(2018) Can foundations solve the journalism crisis? Journalism 19(8): 1059–1077.

Besley

Prat

(2006) Handcuffs for the grabbing hand? Media capture and government accountability. American Economic Review 96(3): 720–736. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.3.720 .

Boyle

McLeod

Armstrong

(2012) Adherence to the protest paradigm: The influence of protest goals and tactics on news coverage in U.S. and international newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics 17: 127–144.

Brkić

(2015) Media ownership and regulation in Montenegro. South East Media Observatory. Available at: https://mediaobservatory.net/radar/media-integrity-report-media-ownership-and-financing-montenegro.

10.

Cagé

(2016) Saving the media. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.

11.

Camaj

(2021) Producing anti-regime protest news in a polarized and clientelistic media system: A framing building approach. Journalism https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211036616

12.

Chan

Lee

(1984) The journalistic paradigm on civil protests: A case study of Hong Kong. In: Arno

Dissanayake

(eds) The News Media in National and International Conflict. Boulder:Westview Press, pp.183–202.

13.

Čađenović

Radulović

(2017) Montenegro: double standards in regulating media concentration. Available at: https://www.balcanicaucaso.org/eng/Areas/Montenegro/Montenegro-double-standards-in-regulating-media-concentration-179589.

14.

Ferree

Gamson

Rucht

, et al. (2002) Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

15.

Ferrucci

(2015) Public journalism no more: The digitally native news nonprofit and public service journalism. Journalism 16(7): 904–919.

16.

Fox

Waisbord

(2002) Latin politics, global media. In: Fox

Waisbord

(eds) Latin Politics, Global Media. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp.1–21.

17.

GDELT (2016) The GDELT Project. Available at: http://gdeltproject.org.

18.

Ghobrial

Wilkins

(2015) The politics of political communication: Competing news discourses of the 2011 Egyptian protests. International Communication Gazette 77(2): 129–150.

19.

Guerrero

Márquez-Ramírez

(2014) The ‘captured liberal’ model: Media systems, journalism and communication policies in Latin America. The International Journal of Hispanic Media 7: 1–12.

20.

Hallin

Mancini

(2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

21.

Hallin

Papathanassopoulos

(2002) Political clientelism and the media: Southern Europe and Latin America in comparative perspective. Media, Culture & Society 24(2): 175–195.

22.

Hallin

Mancini

(eds) (2012) Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World. Cambridge University Press.

23.

Hamelink

(2015) Global Communication. London: Sage.

24.

Harlow

(2023) Digital-Native News and the Remaking of Latin American Mainstream and Alternative Journalism. London: Routledge.

25.

Harlow

Kilgo

Salaverría

, et al. (2020) Is the whole world watching? Building a typology of protest coverage on social media from around the world. Journalism Studies 21(11): 1590–1608.

26.

Harlow

Salaverría

(2016) Regenerating journalism: exploring the ‘alternativeness’ and ‘digital-ness’ of online-native media in Latin America. Digital Journalism 4(8): 1001–1019.

27.

Hertog

McLeod

(1995) Anarchists wreak havoc in downtown Minneapolis: A multi-level study of media coverage of radical protest. Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs 151: 1.

28.

Jiménez-Martínez

(2020) Media and the Image of the Nation During Brazil‘s 2013 Protests. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

29.

Kilgo

Harlow

(2019) Protests, media coverage, and a hierarchy of social struggle. The International Journal of Press/Politics 24(4): 508–530.

30.

Kilgo

Harlow

García-Perdomo

, et al. (2018) From# Ferguson to# Ayotzinapa: Analyzing differences in domestic and foreign protest news shared on social media. Mass Communication and Society 21(5): 606–630.

31.

Konieczna

(2018) Journalism Without Profit: Making News When the Market Fails. New York: Oxford University Press.

32.

Krippendorff

(2004) Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

33.

Lansner

Uljarevic

(2015) Eroding freedoms: Media and soft censorship in Montenegro. Paris: World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers Center for International Media Assistance. Available at: https://www.rcmediafreedom.eu/Publications/Reports/Eroding-Freedoms-Media-and-Soft-Censorship-in-Montenegro.

34.

Lawson

(2002) Building the Fourth Estate: Democratization and the Rise of a Free Press in Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.

35.

Mancini

(2012) Instrumentalization of the media vs political parallelism. Chinese Journal of Communication 5(3): 262–280.

36.

McLeod

Hertog

(1999) Social control, social change and the mass media’s role in the regulation of protest groups. In: Demers

Viswanath

(eds) Mass Media, Social Control and Social Change: A Macrosocial Perspective. Ames: Iowa State University Press, pp.305–330.

37.

Milutinovic

(2017) Media ownership and democratic capacity of transitional society: The case of Serbia. European Journal of Communication 32: 367–380.

38.

Mourão

(2019) From mass to elite protests: News coverage and the evolution of antigovernment demonstrations in Brazil. Mass Communication and Society 22(1): 49–71.

39.

Nee

(2013) Creative destruction: An exploratory study of how digitally native news nonprofits are innovating online journalism practices. International Journal on Media Management 15(1): 3–22.

40.

Nenezic

(2016) Equal chances for all media in Montenegro: Annual report. Podgorica: Center for Civic Education. Available at: http://media.cgo-cce.org/2017/09/Equal-chances-for-all-media-in-Montenegro.pdf.

41.

Örnebring

(2012) Clientelism, elites, and the media in Central and Eastern Europe. The International Journal of Press/Politics 17(4): 497–515.

42.

Papathanassopoulos

(2013) Greece: Press subsidies in Turmoil. In: State Aid for Newspapers: Theories, Cases, Actions. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp.237–251.

43.

Porto

(2007) TV news and political change in Brazil: The impact of democratization on TV Globo’s journalism. Journalism 8(4): 363–384.

44.

Robles-Rivera

(2019) Media captured: Elites’ cohesion and media networks in Costa Rica and El Salvador . Doctoral Dissertation. Available at: https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/23720.

45.

Rockwell

(2017) Evolving media structures in Central America. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics 13(1-2): 57–73.

46.

Rockwell

Janus

(2003) Media Power in Central America. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

47.

Roudakova

(2008) Media-political clientelism: Lessons from anthropology. Media, Culture & Society 30(1): 41–59.

48.

RSF (n.d.) Media ownership monitor Serbia. Reporters Without Borders. Available at: https://serbia.mom-rsf.org/.

49.

RSF (2021) World Press Freedom Index. Reporters Without Borders. Available at: https://rsf.org/en/2021-world-press-freedom-index-journalism-vaccine-against-disinformation-blocked-more-130-countries.

50.

Sandoval-García

(2008) The media in Costa Rica: Many media, scarce communication. In: Lugo-Ocando

(ed) The Media in Latin America. New York: Open University Press, pp.100–115.

51.

Schiffrin

(2017) In the Service of Power: Media Capture and the Threat to Democracy. Washington, DC: The Center for International Media Assistance.

52.

Scott

Bunce

Wright

(2019) Foundation funding and the boundaries of journalism. Journalism Studies 20(14): 2034–2052.

53.

Shahin

Zheng

Sturm

, et al. (2016) Protesting the paradigm: A comparative study of news coverage of protests in Brazil, China and India. The International Journal of Press/Politics 21: 143–164.

54.

Shoemaker

(1984) Media treatment of deviant political groups. Journalism Quarterly 61(1): 66–82.

55.

Smokvina

Furnémont

Janssen

, et al. (2017) Montenegro media sector inquiry with recommendations for harmonisation with the Council of Europe and European Union standard

Available at: https://rm.coe.int/montenegro-media-sector-inquiry-with-the-council-of-europe-and-europea/16807b4dd0.

56.

Stiglitz

(2017) Toward a taxonomy of media capture. In: In the Service of Power: Media Capture and the Threat to Democracy. Washington, DC: The Center for International Media Assistance, pp.9–18.

57.

Tadic-Mijovic

Šajkaš

(2016) Captured news media. Washington, DC: Center for International Media Assistance. Available at: https://www.cima.ned.org/resource/captured-news-media-bosnia-herzegovina-serbia-montenegro/.

58.

Torch

(2013) From ‘and’ to ‘either/or’: Nationhood in Montenegro during the Yugoslav twentieth century. East European Politics and Societies 28(1): 25–48.

59.

Veljanovski

(2009) Mediji i država u tranziciji [Media and states in transition]. Godišnjak FPN: 363–377.

60.

Vukovic

(2017) Media pluralism monitor 2016. Country report: Montenegro. Center for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom. Available at: https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/46815/Montenegro_EN.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

61.

Wagemans

Witschge

Deuze

(2016) Ideology as resource in entrepreneurial journalism: The French online news startup Mediapart. Journalism Practice 10(2): 160–177.

62.

Waisbord

(2008) The myth of media globalization—by K. Hafez: book reviews. The British Journal of Sociology 59(3): 592–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00209_6.x .

63.

Waisbord

(2013) Democracy, journalism, and Latin American populism. Journalism 14(4): 504–521.

64.

Wasko

(2014) The study of the political economy of the media in the twenty-first century. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics 10: 259–271.

65.

Weaver

Scacco

(2013) Revisiting the protest paradigm: The Tea Party as filtered through prime-time cable news. The International Journal of Press/Politics 18(1): 61–84.

66.

Wouters

(2015) Reporting demonstrations: on episodic and thematic coverage of protest events in Belgian television news. Political Communication 32(3): 475–496.

Protest reporting across clientelist media systems

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References