Through the theoretical lenses of cultural gaming and paradigmatic assumptions of Eastern and Western cultures, this article looks into the interrelationships between game intentions and communication strategies. Through a thematic analysis of the Chinese traditional cultural classics from the pre-Qin (221 BCE–206 BCE) to the Republic of China (1912–1949) from the Chinese Text Project, three featured themes of water including the best and the softest, carrying boats and capsizing boats, and the most violent and the strongest have emerged in correspondence to the positive zero sum, zero sum, and negative zero sum game intentions. Thus, a water and game theory for intercultural communication has been constructed. The theory is applicable to managing intercultural communication barriers, esp. systematic misunderstanding between individuals from China and the West, between Chinese enterprises and their counterparts in other countries, and between China and other countries on various intercultural communication occasions.
AsanteMK (1980)
Intercultural communication: An inquiry into research direction.Communication Yearbook4: 401–410.
2.
BraunVClarkeV (2006)
Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
3.
ChenGM (2009a)
Beyond the dichotomy of communication studies. Asian Journal of Communication19(4): 398–411.
4.
ChenGM (2009b)
Towards trans-cultural understanding: A harmony theory of Chinese communication. China Media Report Overseas26: 682–686.
5.
ChenGMHoltGR (2002)
Persuasion through the water metaphor in Dao De Jing. Intercultural Communication Studies11: 153–171.
6.
ChuT (2011)
以博弈论视角探析中西文化碰撞及文化全球化趋势 [An analysis of the Chinese and Western cultural collision and cultural globalization trend from the perspective of game theory]. Cultural Academic Journal4: 75–79.
7.
Confucius (2006–2019a) The Analects·Yanyuan. Trans. James Legge. Available at: https://ctext.org/analects/yan-yuan. (accessed 6 March 2018).
8.
Confucius (2006–2019b) The Analects·Yongye. Trans. James Legge. Available at: https://ctext.org/analects/yong-ye. (accessed 10 March 2018).
9.
DaiXD (2011) 跨文化交际理论 [Intercultural Communication Theories].
Shanghai:
Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
10.
DengT (1986) 邓拓文集(第二卷) [The Collected Works by Deng Tuo, II].
Beijing:
Beijing Press.
11.
DuWM (2007)
文明间对话的最新路径与具体行动 [The latest path and concrete action of dialogue among civilizations]. Open Times1: 68–86.
12.
FuSX (2012)
文化博弈与中国形象 [Cultural games and Chinese images].Observation and Ponderation1: 15–16.
13.
GongJCZhaoD (2015)
全球化背景下中西方文化安全博弈分析 – 基于不完全信息动态博弈模型 [A game analysis of Chinese and western culture security under the background of globalization – Based on the incomplete information dynamic game model]. Journal of Hubei Economics Institute12: 28–30.
14.
GuMD (2016)
Confucian ethics and the spirit of world order: A re-conception of the Chinese way of tolerance. Philosophy East and West66(3): 787–804.
15.
GuJS (2005)
亟待构建和谐的博弈文化 [A harmonious game culture to be urgently constructed]. China Opening Journal119(2): 33–35.
16.
JiaWS (2001) The Remaking of the Chinese Character and Identity in the 21st Century: The Chinese Face Practices.
Westport, CT:
Ablex.
17.
JiaWSJiZW (2018)
人类命运共同体与全球传播 [Community of human destiny and global communication]. Global Media Journal5(3): 27–37.
18.
KuhnST (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed.
Chicago, IL:
The University of Chicago Press.
19.
Lao Tzu (2006–2019) Dao De Jing. Trans. James Legge. Available at: https://ctext.org/dao-de-jing. (accessed 16 June 2018).
20.
Liang D (2012) An analysis of the evolution of the game theory in culture. Journal of Qilu Normal University,
151(3): 132–136.
21.
LieberthalKWangJ (2012) Addressing US-China strategic distrust. In: ThorntonJL (ed) China Center Monograph Series. 4: 1–51.
Washington, DC:
Brookings Institution.
22.
LiuQC (2018) 规训与惩罚博弈论: 最高级思维和生存策略 [Discipline and Punishment Game Theory: The Most Advanced Thinking and Survival Strategy].
Beijing:
Beijing United Publishing Co., Ltd.
23.
MarxKEngelsF (1972) 马克思恩格斯全集 (第31卷) [Complete Works of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, vol. 31].
Beijing:
People’s Press.
24.
MiikeY (2003) Beyond Euro-centrism in the intercultural field: Searching for an Asiacentric paradigm. In: StarostaWJChenGM (eds) Ferment in the Intercultural Field: Axiology/Values/Praxis.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE, pp. 243–276.
25.
MiikeY (2010)
An anatomy of Euro-centrism in communication scholarship: The role of Asia-centricity in de-westernizing theory and research.China Media Research6(1): 1–11.
26.
OwenWF (1984)
Interpretative themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech70: 274–287.
27.
ShaoPRYaoJY (2013)
寻根主义: 华人本土传播理论的构建 [Root-seeking: Construction of Chinese local communication theory]. Journal of Xinjiang Normal University4: 28–32.
28.
ShaoPRYaoJY (2016)
传播理论的胚胎: 华夏传播十大观念 [The embryo of communication theory: The ten concepts of Chinese Communication]. Zhejiang Academic Journal1: 203–215.
29.
Shao PR and Yao JY (2018) Thirty years of the indigenous studies: Construction of the Chinese communication theories (1988–2018). China Media Report, 17(3): 4–19.
30.
ShiX (2006)
中国话语研究的发展策略 [The development strategies of China’s discourse research]. Journal of Zhejiang University4: 57.
31.
ShiX (2010) 文化话语研究: 探索中国的理论、方法与问题 [Cultural Discourse Studies: Exploring China’s Theories, Methods, and Issues].
Beijing:
Peking University Press.
32.
ShiX (2012)
话语研究方法的中国模式 [The Chinese mode of discourse research methods]. Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies23(6): 5–7.
33.
ShiX (2018) (
逆)全球化语境下的中国话语理论与实践 [Chinese discourse theory and practice in the against-globalization context]. Journal of Foreign Languages41(5): 90–95.
34.
SturgeonD (2019) Chinese text project: A dynamic digital library of pre-modern Chinese. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. Available at: https://ctext.org (accessed 21 November 2018).
35.
TaylorSJBogdanR (1989) Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: The Search for Meanings.
New York:
John Wiley & Sons.
36.
Wang HS (2012) The peace and turmoil in Ancient China and their relationships with population. Journal of Renmin University of China 26(3): 103–110.
37.
WangKQ (2005)
文化博弈与文化整合 [Cultural games and cultural integration]. Changbai Journal5: 101–104.
38.
WilsonDSperberD (2012) Meaning and Coherence.
Cambridge, MA:
Cambridge University Press.
39.
WisemanRLHornTV (1995) Theorizing in intercultural communication research. In: WisemanRL (ed) Intercultural Communication Theory. pp. 2–7.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE.
40.
XieQGChenYC (2015)
“风草论”: 建构中国本土化传播理论的尝试 [“Wind and grass theory”: An attempt to construct China’s local communication theory]. Modern Communication37(9): 59–64.
41.
Xu PD (2006) A history of China’s news communication: 1949–2005. Chongqing: Chongqing Press.
42.
Xuanzang (2007) 大唐西域记 [Buddhist Records of the Western World].
Nanning:
Guangxi Normal University Press.
YaoJYShaoPR (2018)
华夏传播理论建构试探: 从“传播的传递观”到“传播的接受观” [A probe into the construction of Huaxia communication theory: From the ‘conveyance view of communication’ to ‘the acceptance view of communication]. Zhejiang Social Sciences264(8): 121–129 + 160.
45.
YuYLShiQBCuiHF, et al. (2012)
中国传播学研究破冰之旅的回顾 – 余也鲁教授访问记[Reviewing the ice-thawing trip of Chinese communication research – An interview with Professor Yu Yelu]. Journalism and Communication19(4): 6.
46.
Zengzi (2006–2019) 礼记·大学 [Liji·The Great Learning]. Available at: https://ctext.org/liji/da-xue (accessed 29 March 2019).
47.
ZhangLH (2011)
皮尔士对康托连续统的哲学批判 [Peirce’s philosophical critique of Cantor’s continuum]. Studies in the Philosophy of Science and Technology28(2): 66–70.
48.
ZhangSW (2012)
关于人水关系的哲学思考 [A philosophical consideration of the relationship between human being and water]. Water Resources Development Research2: 89–93.
49.
ZhuXJ (2007)
科学发展观对传播学本土化路径选择的现实意义 – 重申发展传播学的理念 [The practical significance of the scientific outlook on the development to the localization path of communication studies – Reaffirming the idea of the developing communication studies]. Journal of Chongqing Industrial College12: 141–144 + 158.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
