This article compares two cases of media reporting on the crucial contesting issue of brutality carried out by security forces that proved to be relevant for delegitimizing the regimes in both Poland in 1989 and Egypt in 2011. We show that, despite the different technological infrastructure available and the distinct institutionalization of the political and media systems, we can observe similar mechanisms of mass media communication unfolding around a contesting issue that shook the pillars of moral legitimacy of the regimes, thus paving the way for political transformation.
AlbrechtHSchlumbergerO (2004)
‘Waiting for Godot’: Regime change without democratization in the Middle East. International Political Science Review25(4): 371–392.
AumenteJ (1999) The role and effects of journalism and Samizdat leading up to 1989. In: AumenteJ (ed.) Eastern European Journalism: Before, during and after Communism.
Cresskill, NJ:
Hampton, pp. 41–77.
DelhaesKV (1997) Zur Rolle der legalen polnischen Presse in der Selbstauflösung des Systems. In: MühleE (ed.) Vom Instrument der Partei zur “Vierten Gewalt”: Die ostmitteleuropäische Presse als zeithistorische Quelle.
Marburg:
Herder-Institute, pp. 188–208.
15.
DemaitreE (1966)
Communist semantics.Communist Affairs4(1): 3–7.
16.
DowningJDH (1996) Internationalizing Media Theory: Transition, power, culture. Reflections on Media in Russia, Poland and Hungary 1980–95.
London:
SAGE.
17.
FierkeKM (2012) Political Self-sacrifice: Agency, Body and Emotion in International Relations.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
18.
FouadM (2017) Personal communication with Alexandria correspondent for Al-Shorouk on 25 September 2017.
19.
GhonimW (2012) Revolution 2.0 (in Arabic).
Cairo:
Shorouk.
20.
Goban-KlasT (1997) Stalinism and the Press. Soviet Patterns and Polish Variations. In: MühleE (ed.) Vom Instrument der Partei zur “Vierten Gewalt”: Die ostmitteleuropäische Presse als zeithistorische Quelle.
Marburg:
Herder-Inst, pp. 13–24.
21.
GoldmanMF (1997) Revolution and change in Central and Eastern Europe: Political, Economic, and Social Challenges.
Armonk, NY:
M.E. Sharpe.
22.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
23.
HamdyN (2009)
Arab citizen journalism in action: Challenging mainstream media, authorities and media laws. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture6(1): 92–112.
24.
HansonEO (1987) The Catholic Church in World Politics.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
25.
HermanESChomskyN (1988) Manufacturing CONSENT: The Political Economy of the Mass Media.
New York, NY:
Pantheon Books.
26.
HowardPHussainM (2013) Democracy’s Fourth Wave? Digital Media and the Arab Spring.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
27.
IsmailS (2012)
The Egyptian revolution against the police. Social Research79(2): 435–462.
28.
KassemH (2017) Personal communication with Founder and first editor-in chief of Al-Masry Al-Youm on 26 September 2017.
29.
KhamisSVaughnK (2011)
‘We are all Khaled Said’: The potentials and limitations of cyberactivism in triggering public mobilization and promoting political change. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research4(2&3): 139–157.
30.
KindziukM (2014) Wizerunek medialny ks. Jerzego Popiełuszki w polskiej prasie w latach 1980–1984.
Warszawa:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego.
31.
KleinJ (2016) 65. Politische Semantik/semantische Kämpfe. In: JägerLHollyWKrappP, et al. (eds) Sprache – Kultur – Kommunikation/Language – Culture – Communication: Berlin.
Boston, MA:
De Gruyter, pp. 607–616.
32.
LabaR (1991) The Roots of Solidarity: A Political Sociology of Poland's Working-class Democratization.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
33.
LammichS (1985) Der “Popieluszko-Prozess”: Sicherheitspolizei und katholische Kirche in Polen; Bericht und Dokumentation.
Köln:
Verlag Wissenschaft und Politik.
34.
LuhmannN (2000) The Reality of the Mass Media.
Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
35.
MayringP (2016) Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung: eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken.
Weinheim:
Beltz.
36.
MerkelW (2010) Systemtransformation: eine Einführung in die Theorie und Empirie der Transformationsforschung. 2nd ed.
Wiesbaden:
VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
37.
MeyerF (1985) Ein Mord als kleineres Übel. Der Spiegel, 28 January, 106–117.
38.
MommsenM (1989) Glasnost in der UdSSR. Von systemimmanenter „Kritik und Selbstkritik“ zum systemüberwindenden öffentlichen Diskurs. In: RytlewskiR (ed.) Politik und Gesellschaft in sozialistischen Ländern.
Wiesbaden:
VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 198–220.
39.
O’DonnellGSchmitterPC (1986) Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies.
London:
Johns Hopkins University Press.
40.
PoznanskiK (1996) Poland’s Protracted Transition: Institutional Change and Economic Growth 1970–1994.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
41.
PszenickiC (1983)
Freedom of expression in Jaruzelski’s Poland. Index on Censorship12(6): 19–24.
42.
RametSP (1991) Social Currents in Eastern Europe: The Sources and Meaning of the Great Transformation.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
43.
RametSP (2017) The Catholic Church in Polish History: From 966 to the Present.
New York, NY:
Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
RollS (2013) Egypt’s business elite after Mubarak. SWP Research Paper.
Berlin:
Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, September.
45.
RuchtD (1994) Öffentlichkeit als Mobilisierungsfaktor für soziale Bewegungen. In: NeidhardtF (ed.) Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen.
Opladen:
Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 337–358.
46.
SakrN (2013)
Social media, television talk shows, and political change in Egypt.Television and New Media14(4): 322–337.
47.
SchäferJ (2009) Protest in Ägypten: Wie Al-Jazeera und andere Medien die Kifaya-Bewegung möglich machten.
Berlin:
Frank&Timme.
48.
Sreberny-MohammadiAMohammadiA (1994) Small Media, Big Revolution: Communication, Culture and the Iranian Revolution.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
