In this article, we analyse how legacy media organizations in six countries are adapting to the changing business of news. We focus on how similarities and differences in their responses to digital developments are shaped by the interplay between organizational legacy and national context. The study draws on media sociology and comparative media systems research and is based on 54 interviews with senior editors and managers at 25 newspapers and commercial broadcasters in Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and the UK. We find that organizations within the same medium respond to change in similar ways (newspapers versus broadcasters), and that these responses are surprisingly similar across different countries. We argue that factors related to the medium-specific legacy shape media adaptation more than do structural differences between national media systems because news organizations faced with a changing and uncertain environment imitate the strategies adopted by peer organizations elsewhere.
AGCOM (2012) Relazione annuale sull’attività svolta e sui programmi di lavoro. Annual report of Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni’s. Available at: www.agcom.it (accessed 9 October 2018).
2.
Arrese Á (2016) From gratis to paywalls: A brief history of a retro-innovation in the press’s business. Journalism Studies 17(8): 1051–1067.
3.
Artemas K, Vos TP and Duffy M (2018) Journalism hits a wall: Rhetorical construction of newspapers’ editorial and advertising relationship. Journalism Studies 19(7): 1004–1020.
4.
CarlsonM (2015) When news sites go native: Redefining the advertising-editorial divide in response to native advertising. Journalism16(7): 849–865.
5.
ConilRF (2016) Camouflaging church as state: An exploratory study of journalism’s native advertising. Journalism Studies17(7): 904–914.
6.
Cornia A, Sehl A, Simon F, et al. (2017) Pay Models in European News. Factsheet. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
7.
BoczkowskiP (2004) Digitizing the News: Innovation in Online Newspapers, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
BrüggemannMEngesserSBüchelF, et al.(2014) Hallin and Mancini revisited: Four empirical types of western media systems. Journal of Communication64: 1037–1065.
9.
DickinsonRMatthewsJSaltzisK (2013) Studying journalists in changing times: Understanding news work as socially situated practice. The International Communication Gazette75(1): 3–18.
10.
DiMaggioPJPowellWW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48(2): 147–160.
11.
EAO (2014) Yearbook 2014: Television, Cinema, Video and On-demand Audiovisual Services. The pan-European Picture, Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.
12.
GrueskinBSeaveAGravesL (2011) The Story So Far: What we Know About the Business of Digital Journalism, New York: Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia Journalism School.
13.
Hallin DC and Mancini P (eds) (2012) Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–344.
14.
Hallin DC and Mancini P (2017) Ten years after comparing media systems: What have we learned? Political Communication 34(2): 155–172.
15.
HamiltonJT (2004) All the News that’s Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into News, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
HamiltonJT (2016) Democracy’s Detectives: The Economics of Investigative Journalism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
HumphreysPJ (1996) Mass Media and Media Policy in Western Europe, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
18.
HumphreysPJ (2012) A political scientist’s contribution to the comparative study of media systems in Europe: A response to Hallin and Mancini. In: PuppisMJustN (eds) Trends in Communication Policy Research, Bristol: Intellect, pp. 157–176.
KüngL (2015) Innovators in Digital News, London: I.B. Tauris.
21.
Mediatique (2012) The Provision of News in the UK. Report for Ofcom. London: Mediatique.
22.
MyllylahtiM (2014) Newspaper paywalls – The hype and the reality: A study of how paid news content impacts on media corporation revenues. Digital Journalism2(2): 179–194.
23.
NielsenRK (2012) How newspapers began to blog. Information, Communication & Society15(6): 959–978.
24.
NielsenRK (2013) The absence of structural Americanization: Media system developments in six affluent democracies, 2000–2009. The International Journal of Press/Politics18(4): 392–412.
25.
PadgettJFPowellWW (2012) The Emergence of Organizations and Markets, Princeton, NJ and Woodstock: Princeton University Press.
26.
Paterson C and Domingo D (eds) (2008) Making Online News. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 1–236.
27.
PaulusTWoodsMAtkinsDP, et al.(2017) The discourse of QDAS: Reporting practices of ATLAS.ti and NVivo users with implications for best practices. International Journal of Social Research Methodology20(1): 35–47.
28.
PaulussenS (2016) Innovation in the newsroom. In: WitschgeTAndersonCWDomingoD, et al.(eds) The SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism, London: SAGE, pp. 192–206.
29.
PicardRG (2011) The Economics and Financing of Media Companies, 2nd ed. New York: Fordham University Press.
30.
PicardRG (2014) Twilight or new dawn of journalism? Evidence from the changing news ecosystem. Journalism Studies15(5): 500–510.
31.
PickardVWilliamsAT (2014) Salvation or folly? The promises and perils of digital paywalls. Digital Journalism2(2): 195–213.
32.
PowersMZambranoSV (2016) Explaining the formation of online news startups in France and the United States: A field analysis. Journal of Communication66: 857–877.
33.
RobinsCSEisenK (2017) Strategies for the effective use of NVivo in a large-scale study. Qualitative Inquiry23(10): 768–778.
34.
ScottRW (2008) Institutions and Organisations: Ideas and Interests, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
35.
SquiresJ (1993) Read All about It: The Corporate Takeover of America’s Newspapers, New York: Random House.
36.
TaylorG (2014) Scarcity of attention for a medium of abundance. In: GrahamMDuttonWH (eds) Society and the Internet, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 257–271.
37.
UsherN (2014) Making News at the New York Times, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
38.
Van den BulckHTambuyzerS (2013) Collisions of convergence: Flemish news workers’ and management’s perceptions of the impact of PSB newsroom integration on journalistic practices and identities. The International Communication Gazette75(1): 54–75.
39.
Wahl-JorgensenK (2009) On the newsroom-centricity of journalism ethnography. In: BirdSE (ed.) Journalism and Anthropology, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 21–35.
40.
WAN-IFRA (2015) World Press Trends 2015, Paris: WAN-IFRA.
41.
WAN-IFRA (2016) World Press Trends Database. Available at: www.wptdatabase.org (accessed 1 September 2016).
42.
Westlund O (2011) Cross-Media News Work: Sensemaking of the Mobile Media (R)evolution. JMG Book Series No. 64. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.
