Most comparative research on journalistic objectivity, and particularly the relation between objectivity and professional roles, has been carried out in the context of Western media systems and from the perspective of journalists’ role conceptions. However, the relation between role performance and the implementation of the objectivity norm remains unsolved, especially in countries with no clear-cut journalistic tradition of objectivity. Based on a content analysis of news stories published in Chile, Mexico, and Spain (N = 7,868), this study examines (1) the use of four objective reporting methods in newspapers from Spain, Mexico, and Chile, and (2) the influence of the performance of six journalistic roles in those methods. The results show that the materialization of objectivity varies across journalistic cultures, revealing also a significant influence of the performance of professional roles on the implementation of objectivity in news. The study sheds some light on the implication of these results in countries expected to display similar traits due to their historical and cultural affinities but which show very distinctive patterns.
AlbuquerqueA (2012) On models and margins: Comparative media models viewed from a Brazilian perspective. In: HallinDManciniP (eds) Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 72–95.
2.
BensonR (2006) News media as a “journalistic field”: What Bourdieu adds to new institutionalism, and vice versa. Political Communication23(2): 187–202.
3.
BensonRHallinD (2007) How states, markets and globalization shape the news: The French and US National Press, 1965–97. European Journal of Communication22(1): 27–48.
4.
BerganzaROllerMMeierK (2010) Los roles periodísticos y la objetividad en el periodismo político escrito suizo y español. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social65: 488–502.
5.
BernedoP (2008) Nacimiento y desarrollo de la prensa periódica nacional en América Latina. In: BarreraC (Coord) (ed.) Historia del Periodismo Occidental, 2nd ed. Barcelona: Ariel, pp. 135–168.
6.
CanelMJ (1997) La objetividad periodística en campaña electoral: Las actitudes profesionales de los periodistas de TVE1 y Antena3 en las elecciones de 1996. Zer: Revista de Estudios de Comunicación2: 55–70.
7.
CanelMJPiqueAM (1998) La evolución profesional de los periodistas españoles. Comunicación y Sociedad32: 107–134.
8.
Chalaby J (1996) Journalism as an Anglo-American invention. A comparison of the development of French and Anglo-American journalism, 1830–1920s. European Journal of Communication 11(3): 303–326.
9.
DeuzeM (2005) Popular journalism and professional ideology: Tabloid reporters and editors speak out. Media, Culture and Society27(6): 861–882.
10.
DiStefano C, Zhu M and Mindrila D (2009) Understanding and using factor scores. Practical Assessment. Research & Evaluation 14(20): 1–11.
11.
DonsbachWKlettB (1993) Subjective objectivity. How journalists in four countries define a key term of their profession. International Communication Gazette51(1): 53–83.
12.
Donsbach W and Patterson T (2004) Political news journalists: Partisanship, professionalism and political roles in five countries. In: Esser EF and Pfetsch B (eds) Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 251–270.
13.
EsserFUmbrichtA (2013) Competing models of journalism? Political affairs coverage in US, British, German, Swiss, French and Italian newspapers. Journalism14(8): 989–1007.
14.
Fernández AlonsoISantanaF (2000) Estado y Medios de Comunicación en la España Democrática, Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
15.
GuerreroMAMárquez-RamírezM (2014) Media Systems and Communication Policies in Latin America, London: Palgrave.
16.
HallinDManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
HallinDPapathanassopoulosS (2002) Political clientelism and the media: Southern Europe and Latin America in comparative perspective. Media, Culture and Society24(2): 175–195.
18.
HanitzschTHanuschFMelladoCet al. (2011) Mapping journalism cultures across nations: A comparative study of 18 countries. Journalism Studies12(3): 273–293.
19.
HughesS (2006) Newsrooms in Conflict: Journalism and the Democratization of Mexico, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
20.
KovachBRosenstielT (2007) The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect, Completely Updated and Revised, New York: Random House.
21.
LichtembergJ (2000) In defence of objectivity revisited. In: CurranJGurevitchM (eds) Mass Media and Society, London: Arnold, pp. 238–254.
22.
MarasS (2013) Objectivity in Journalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
23.
Márquez-RamírezM (2012) Valores normativos y prácticas de reporteo en tensión: Percepciones profesionales de periodistas en México. Cuadernos de Información30: 97–110.
24.
Márquez-RamírezM (2014) Post-authoritarian politics in a neoliberal era: Revising media and journalism transition in Mexico. In: GuerreroMMárquez-RamírezM (eds) Media Systems and Communication Policies in Latin America, London: Palgrave, pp. 272–292.
25.
Martínez NicolásMHumanesMLSaperasE (2014) La mediatización de la política en el periodismo español. Análisis longitudinal de la información política en la prensa de referencia (1980–2010). Trípodos34(1): 41–59.
26.
MelladoC (2015) Professional roles in news content: Six dimensions of journalistic role performance. Journalism Studies16(4): 596–614.
27.
Mellado C, Hellmueller L and Donsbach W (eds) (2017) Journalistic Role Performance: Concepts, Models and Measures. New York: Routledge.
28.
MelladoCHumanesML (2015) The use of objective and analytical reporting as a method of professional work: A cross-longitudinal study of chilean political coverage. The International Journal of Press/Politics20(1): 67–84.
29.
Mellado C, Márquez-Ramirez, M, Mick J, et al. (2016) Journalistic performance in Latin America: A comparative study of professional roles in news content. Journalism 1–20.
30.
MelladoCMoreiraSLagosCet al. (2012) Comparing journalism cultures in Latin America: The case of Chile, Brazil and Mexico. International Communication Gazette74(1): 60–77.
31.
MelladoCVan DalenA (2014) Between rhetoric and practice. Explaining the gap between role conception and performance in journalism. Journalism Studies15(6): 859–878.
32.
MindichD (1998) Just the Facts: How Objectivity Came to Define American Journalism, New York: New York University Press.
33.
Schudson M (2001) The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism 2(2): 149–170.
34.
SkovsgaardMAlbækEBroPet al. (2013) A reality check: How journalists’ role perceptions impact their implementation of the objectivity norm. Journalism14(1): 22–42.
35.
SkovsgaardMVan DalenA (2013) Dodging the gatekeepers? Social media in the campaign mix during the 2011 Danish elections. Information, Communication and Society16(5): 737–756.
36.
StrömbäckJLuengoO (2008) Polarized pluralist and democratic corporatist models: A comparison of election news coverage in Spain and Sweden. International Communication Gazette70(6): 547–562.
37.
TandocEHellmuellerLVosT (2013) Mind the gap: Between journalistic role conception and role enactment. Journalism Practice7(5): 539–554.
38.
TuchmanG (1972) Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology77(4): 660–679.
39.
Van DalenAde VreeseCAlbækE (2012) Different roles, different content? A four-country comparison of the role conceptions and reporting style of political journalists. Journalism13(7): 903–922.
40.
Vos T (2005) Journalistic role conception: A bridge between the reporter and the press. In: Paper presented at International Communication Association (ICA) annual conference, Journalism Studies Division, New York, NY, 29 May.
41.
WaisbordS (2006) In journalism we trust? Credibility and fragmented journalism in Latin America. In: VoltmerK (ed.) Mass Media and Political Communication in New Democracies, London: Routledge, pp. 76–91.
42.
Ward S (1999) Pragmatic News Objectivity: Objectivity with a Human Face. Discussion Paper D37. Cambridge: Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
43.
WeaverDBeamRBrownleeBet al. (2007) The American Journalist in the 21st Century: US News People at the Dawn of a New Millennium, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
WeaverDWillnatL (2012) The Global Journalist in the 21st Century, New York: Routledge.
