This study examines a month of cable news coverage of the Egyptian uprising in 2011. Specifically it examines how Al Jazeera English and CNN differ in their use of story and visual frames. The quantitative content analysis (N = 503) found significant differences between the two networks. Al Jazeera English employs more frames about Egyptian history, political strategies, public engagement, public opinion, economy and the impact on the future of the country more frequently than CNN. When examining visual frames of conflict, Al Jazeera English was more likely to employ conflict frame–not violent than CNN. CNN was more likely than Al Jazeera English to employ the conflict frame–latent violence.
AdaySCluveriusJLivingstonS (2005) As goes the statue, so goes the war: The emergence of the victory frame in television coverage of the Iraq War. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media49(3): 314–331.
2.
AlasuutariPQadirACreutzK (2013) The domestication of foreign news: News stories related to the 2011 Egyptian revolution in British, Finnish and Pakistani newspaper. Media, Culture & Society35(6): 692–707.
3.
AminH (2012) The nature of the channel’s global audience. In: SiebP (ed.) Al Jazeera English: Global News in a Changing World, New York: Palgrave Macmillian, pp. 29–40.
4.
BerinskyAJDruckmanJN (2007) Public opinion research and support for the Iraq War. Public Opinion Quarterly71(1): 126–141.
5.
BradleyM (1994) Emotional memory: A dimensional analysis. In: Von GoozenSVan de PollNESergeantJA (eds) Emotions: Essays on Emotion Theory, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 1–37.
6.
BruceMD (2014) Framing Arab Spring conflict: A visual analysis of coverage on five transnational Arab news channels. Journal of Middle East Media10: 1–26.
7.
BruceMD (2016) Sensational pictures: An analysis of visual structure on five transnational Arab news channels. In: PavlikJV (ed.) Digital Technology and the Future of Broadcasting: A Global Perspective, London: Routledge, pp. 76–93.
8.
BurgoonMMillerMDCohenM (1978) An empirical test of a model of resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research5(1): 27–39.
9.
CappellaJNJamiesonKH (1997) Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good, New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
ChoJBoyleMPKeumH (2003) Media, terrorism, and emotionality: Emotional differences in media content and public reactions to the September 11th terrorist attacks. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media47(3): 309–327.
11.
Caputo P (2000) Do images of war need justification? Nieman Reports 54(3): 51.
12.
de VreeseCHSemetkoAA (2000) Political Campaigning in Referendums: Framing the Referendum Issue, London: Routledge.
13.
EntmanRM (1989) Democracy Without Citizens: Media and The Decay of American Politics, New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Entman RM (1991) Symposium framing US coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran air incidents. Journal of communication 41(4): 6–27.
15.
EntmanR (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication43(4): 51–58.
16.
FahmyS (2010) Contrasting visual frames of our times: A framing analysis of English- and Arabic-language press coverage of war and terrorism. The International Communication Gazette72(8): 695–717.
17.
FeistS (2001) Facing down the global village: The media impact. In: KuglerRFrostE (eds) The Global Century, Washington: National Defense University Press, pp. 709–725.
18.
FishmanJMarvinC (2003) Portrayals of violence and group difference in newspaper photographs: Nationalism and media. Journal of Communication53(1): 32–44.
19.
GolanG (2013) The gates of op-ed diplomacy: Newspaper framing of the 2011 Egyptian revolution. International Communication Gazette75(4): 359–373.
20.
GraberDA (1987) Television news without pictures?Critical Studies in Mass Communication4(1): 74–78.
21.
GroshekJ (2008) Homogenous agendas, disparate frames: CNN and CNN International coverage online. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media52(1): 52–68.
22.
HackettRAZhaoY (1994) Challenging a master narrative: Peace protest and opinion/editorial discourse in the US press during the Gulf War. Discourse & Society5(4): 509–541.
23.
Haigh MM, Pfau M, Danesi J, et al. (2006) A comparison of embedded and non-embedded print coverage of the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 11(2): 139–153.
24.
HaighMM (2014) Afghanistan war coverage more negative over time. Newspaper Research Journal35(3): 38–51.
25.
HarlowSJohnsonT (2011) Overthrowing the protest paradigm? How The New York Times, Global Voices and Twitter covered the Egyptian revolution. International Journal of Communication5: 1359–1374.
26.
IyengarS (1991) Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues?, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
27.
JaspersonAShahDWattsM (1998) Framing the public agenda: Media effects on the importance of the federal budget deficit. Political Communication15(2): 205–224.
28.
KosickiG (2003) The media priming effect: News media and considerations affecting political judgments. In: DillardJPPfauM (eds) The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice, Thousand Oaks: SAGE, pp. 63–81.
29.
Lang A (1995) Defining audio/video redundancy from a limited-capacity information processing perspective. Communication Research 22(1): 86–115.
30.
LangA (2000) The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication50(1): 46–70.
31.
LangANewhagenJEReevesB (1996) Negative video as structure: Emotion, attention, capacity, and memory. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media40(4): 460–477.
NeumanRWJustMRCriglerAN (1992) Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
NewhagenJE (1992) The evening’s bad news: Effects of compelling negative television news images on memory. Journal of Communication42(2): 25–41.
35.
NewhagenJEReevesB (1992) The evening’s bad news: Effects of compelling negative television news images on memory. Journal of Communication42(2): 25–41.
36.
NisbetMCHugeM (2007) Where do science debates come from? Understanding attention cycles and framing. In: BrossardDJShanahanJNesbittC (eds) The Public, The Media, & Agricultural Biotechnology, Cambridge, MA: CABI, pp. 193–230.
37.
NisbetMCLewensteinBV (2002) Biotechnology and the American media: The policy process and the elite press, 1970 to 1999. Science Communication23(4): 359–391.
38.
NorrisPKernMJustM (2003) Framing terrorism. In: NorrisPKernMJustM (eds) Framing Terrorism: The News Media, The Government, and The Public, New York: Routledge, pp. 3–23.
39.
PfauMHaighMGettleM (2004) Embedding journalists in military combat units: Impact on newspaper story frames and tone. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly81(1): 74–88.
40.
PfauMHaighMMLogsdonL (2005) Embedded reporting during the invasion and occupation of Iraq: How embedding journalists affects television news reports. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media49(4): 468–487.
41.
Powers S (2012) The origins of Al Jazeera English In Seib, P. (ed.) Al Jazeera English: global news in a changing world, pp. 5–28.
42.
PowersSel-NawawyM (2009) Al-Jazeera English and global news networks: Clash of civilizations or cross-cultural dialogue?Media, War & Conflict2(3): 263–284.
43.
RosenthalR (1984) Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research, Beverly Hills: SAGE.
44.
RosenthalR (1987) Judgment Studies: Design, Analysis, and Meta-Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
ScheufeleDALewensteinBV (2005) The public and nanotechnology: How citizens make sense of emerging technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research7(6): 659–667.
46.
SchwalbeCBSilcockBWKeithS (2008) Visual framing of the early weeks of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq: Applying the master war narrative to electronic and print images. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media52(3): 448–465.
47.
Sieb P (2012) Introduction. In Seib P (ed.) Al Jazeera English: Global News in a Changing World. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–4.
48.
StriversR (1994) The Culture of Cynicism: American Morality in Decline, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
49.
TuchmanG (1978) Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality, New York: The Free Press.
50.
WheelessLRGrotzJ (1977) The measurement of trust and its relationship to self-disclosure. Human Communication Research3(3): 250–257.
