This article looks back to the rich contributions of this special issue so as to offer reflections on three kinds of challenges that traverse the emerging field of ‘distant suffering studies’: epistemological, conceptual and sociological challenges. It concludes by calling for due attention to be paid to the dialectics of mediation, the co-constitutive relationship among the different ‘moments’ of meaning-production in the circuit of mediation. Such attention, it argues, can substantially enhance the growing theoretical and empirical work in this important new area of Communication Studies.
Couldry N, Madianou M and Pinchevski A (eds) (2012) The Ethics of Media. London: Palgrave.
11.
Foucault M (1983) The subject and power. In: Dreyfus H and Rabinow P (eds) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 208–226.
12.
GaltungJRugeM (1965) The structure of foreign news. Journal of Peace Research2(1): 64–90.
13.
HoijerB (2003) The discourse of global compassion and the media. Nordicom Review2(24): 19–29.
14.
OrgadS (2012) Media Representation and the Global Imagination, Cambridge: Polity.
15.
SilverstoneR (1999) Why Study the Media, Cambridge: Polity.
16.
SilverstoneR (2007) Media and Morality, Cambridge: Polity.
17.
TesterK (2001) Media, Morality and Compassion, London: Palgrave.
18.
TesterK (2010) Humanitarianism and Modern Culture, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
19.
Wilkins L and Christians C (eds) (2008) Handbook of Mass Media Ethics. London: Routledge.
20.
ZelizerB (1998) Remembering to Forget, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
