Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The current study examined multitasking with traditional and new electronic media among college students (N = 532) in three countries: Kuwait, Russia, and the USA. Television, music, phone, and the Internet were the most popular media to multitask with and were often used interchangeably, i.e., without the dominance of one medium over another. The game–music pair was the only one with clear distinction between primary (game) and secondary (music) media. Eating, socializing, and doing homework were the most popular nonmedia activities combined with traditional and new electronic media uses. Media-only and media–nonmedia multitasking were found in positive association with perceived attention paid to media messages. The study not only indicated universal media multitasking trends but also revealed cross-national differences that can be explained by economic, political, and cultural characteristics varying across the three nations.

Keywords

Cross-national comparison global media use trends Kuwait media and nonmedia activities media multitasking perceived attention Russia USA

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahlers

(2006) News consumption and the new electronic media. The International Journal of Press/Politics 11(1): 29–52.

Armstrong

Boriarsky

Mares

(1991) Background television and reading performance. Communication Monographs 58(3): 235–253.

Armstrong

Chung

(2000) Background television and reading memory in context: Assessing TV interference and facilitative context effects on encoding versus retrieval processes. Communication Research 27: 327–352.

Baddeley

(1986) Working Memory, New York: Oxford University Press.

Badhri

Rohm

Sultan

(2010) Tuning in and tuning out: Media multitasking among young consumers. Journal of Consumer Behavior 9: 316–332.

Bluedorn

Kalliath

Strube

(2012) Polychronicity and the inventory of polychronic values: Development of an instrument to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational culture. Journal of Managerial Psychology 14: 205–230.

Bowman

Levine

Waite

(2010) Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading. Computers and Education 54: 927–931.

Carrier

Cheever

Rosen

(2009) Multitasking across generations: Multitasking choices and difficulty ratings in three generations of Americans. Computer in Human Behavior 25: 483–489.

CIAWorld Factbook (2013) Kuwait. Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ku.html (accessed November 2012).

10.

CIAWorld Factbook (2013) Russia. Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/rs.html (accessed November 2012).

11.

CIAWorld Factbook (2013) United States. Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html (accessed November 2012).

12.

Cronbach

(1987) Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analysis recently proposed. Psychological Bulletin 102(3): 414–417.

13.

Economist Intelligence Unit (2012) Democracy Index 2012. Available at: https://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx? campaignid=DemocracyIndex12 (accessed January 2014).

14.

Foehr

(2006) Media multitasking among American youth: Prevalence, predictors and pairings, Kaiser Family Foundation Report. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.

15.

Furnham

Bradley

(1997) Music while you work: The differential distraction of background music on the cognitive test performance of introverts and extroverts. Applied Cognitive Psychology 11: 445–455.

16.

Furnham

Gunter

Peterson

(1994) Television distraction and the performance of introverts and extroverts. Applied Cognitive Psychology 8: 705–711.

17.

Gesteland

(1999) Cross-Cultural Business Behavior: Marketing, Negotiating, and Managing across Cultures, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.

18.

Hall

(1959) The Silent Language, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

19.

Hall

(1990) Understanding Cultural Differences: Germans, French, and Americans, Boston, MA: Intercultural Press.

20.

International Telecommunication Union (2012) Key 2000--2011 country data (Excel format). Available at: http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/statistics (accessed November 2012).

21.

Internet World Stats (2013). Internet usage for all the Americas: North America, Central America, South America and the Caribbean. Available at: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats2.htm (accessed January 2014).

22.

Internet World Stats (2013). Internet usage in Europe: Internet user statistics and population for 53 European countries and regions. Available at: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats4.htm (accessed January 2014).

23.

Internet World Stats (2013). Internet usage in the Middle East: Middle East Internet usage and population statistics. Available at: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats5.htm (accessed January 2014).

24.

Jeong

Fishbein

(2007) Predictors of multitasking with media: Media factors and audience factors. Media Psychology 10: 364–384.

25.

Jeong

Hwang

Finshbein

(2010) Effects of exposure to sexual content in the media on adolescent sexual behaviors: The moderation role of multitasking with media. Media Psychology 13: 222–242.

26.

Jordan

Trentacoste

Henderson

(2007) Measuring the time teens spend with media: Challenges and opportunities. Media Psychology 9(1): 19–41.

27.

Junco

Cotten

(2010) Perceived academic effects of instant message use. Computers and Education 56: 370–378.

28.

Kaufman

Lane

Lindquist

(1991) Exploring more than 24 hours a day: A preliminary investigation of polychronic time use. The Journal of Consumer Research 18: 392–401.

29.

Lang

(2000) The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication 50: 46–70.

30.

Lang

(2006) Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication 56: S57–S80.

31.

Lang

Potter

Bolls

(1999) Something for nothing: Is visual encoding automatic? Media Psychology 1: 145–163.

32.

Levine

Waite

Bowman

(2007) Electronic media use, reading, and academic distractibility in college youth. CyberPsychology and Behavior 10(4): 560–566.

33.

Lindquist

Kaufman-Scarborough

(2007) The Polychronic—Monochronic Tendency Model PMTS scale development and validation. Time & Society 16(2–3): 253–285.

34.

McLuhan

Fiore

(1967) The Medium is the Message: An Inventory of Effects, New York: Random House.

35.

NationMaster (2012a) Media statistics. Households with television, % (most recent) by country. Available at: http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/med_hou_wit_tel-media-households-with-television (accessed November 2012).

36.

NationMaster (2012b) Media statistics. Telephones. Mobile cellular (per capita) (most recent) by country. Available at: http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/med_tel_mob_cel_percap-telephones-mobile-cellular-per-capita (accessed November 2012).

37.

Ophir

Nass

Wagner

(2009) Cognitive control in media multitaskers. PNAS 106(37): 15583–15587.

38.

Pilotta

Schultz

(2005) Simultaneous media experience and synesthesia. Journal of Advertising Research 45: 19–26.

39.

Pool

Koolstra

van der Voort

THA

(2003) Background media and homework performance. Journal of Communication 53: 74–87.

40.

Poposki

Oswald

Brou

(2009) Development of a New Measure of Polychronicity, East Lansing: Michigan State University.

41.

Potter

RFJ

Choi (2006) The effects of auditory structural complexity on attitudes, attention, arousal, and memory. Media Psychology 8: 395–419.

42.

Reporters Without Borders (2013) Press freedom index 2013. Available at: http://en.rsf.org/press-freedom-index-2013,1054.html (accessed December 2013).

43.

Rideout

Foehr

Roberts

(2010) Generation M²: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds, Kaiser Family Foundation Report. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.

44.

Roberts

Foehr

(2008) Trends in media use. The Future of Children 18(1): 11–37.

45.

Rose

Evaristo

Straub

(2003) Culture and consumer responses to Web download time: A four-continent study of mono and polychronism. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 50(1): 31–44.

46.

Salvucci DD, Markley D, Zuber M et al. (2007) iPod distraction: Effects of portable music-player use on driver performance. CHI. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary? doi=10.1.1.67.6357 (accessed November 2012).

47.

Salvucci

Macuga

(2002) Predicting the effects of cellular-phone dialing on driver performance. Cognitive Systems Research 3: 95–102.

48.

Schultz

Block

Raman

(2009) Media synergy comes of age – part I. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice 11(1): 3–19.

49.

The Economist (2008) Computer ownership. Pocket world in figures. Available at: http://www.economist.com/node/12758865? story_id=12758865 (accessed November 2012).

50.

The Independent (2011) Global Mobile Phone Ownership: The Haves and Have-Nots by Region. Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/global-mobile-phone-ownership-the-haves-and-havenots-by-region-2257105.html (accessed November 2012).

51.

United Nations Development Programme (2013) Human development report 2013. The rise of the South: Human progress in a diverse world. Available at: http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/hdr/human-development-report-2013/ (accessed January 2014).

52.

Vandewater

Lee

(2009) Measuring children’s media use in the digital age. American Behavioral Scientist 52(8): 1152–1176.

53.

Vega V (2009) Media-multitasking: Implications for learning and cognitive development in youth. Background paper presented at Seminar on the Impacts of Media Multitasking on Children’s Learning & Development, Stanford University, July 15th.

54.

Voorveld

(2011) Media multitasking and the effectiveness of combining online and radio advertising. Computers in Human Behavior 27(6): 2200–2206.

55.

Voorveld

van der Goot

(2013) Age differences in media multitasking: A diary study. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 57(3): 392–408.

56.

Wallis

(2010) The Impact of Media Multitasking on Children’s Learning and Development: Report from a Research Seminar, New York, NY: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.

57.

Wang

Tchernev

(2012) The “myth” of media multitasking: Reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, personal needs, and gratifications. Journal of Communication 62(3): 493–513.

58.

Zhang

Jeong

Fishbein

(2010) Situational factors competing for attention: The interaction effect of multitasking and sexually explicit content on TV recognition. Journal of Media Psychology 22(1): 2–13.

Multitasking goes global: Multitasking with traditional and new electronic media and attention to media messages among college students in Kuwait,Russia,and the USA

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References