This article argues that communication scholars should collaborate with pluralist economists rather than traditional ones, as alternative economic theories are better suited to understanding the complex process of innovation in communication industries and to integration into multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks. In order to illustrate this point, first the main features of traditional economics that are incompatible with the study of the communication sector are outlined, then, a selection of theories and concepts from complexity economics, modularity and service innovation studies are presented. Moreover, as an illustration of the value of alternative economic theories in explaining change in the communication sector, these concepts are used to outline some of the most important changes and trends that have affected the music industry as a result of its digitization.
BabeRE (1993) The place of information in economics. In: BabeRE (ed.) Information and Communications in Economics. Boston, MA: Kluwer, 41–66.
2.
BakkerP (2005) File-sharing - fight, ignore or compete: Paid download services vrs. P2P networks. Telematics and Infomatics22 (1-2): 41–55.
3.
BaldwinCYClarkKB (1997) Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Business ReviewSeptember-October: 84–94.
4.
BaldwinCYClarkKB (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
BeinhockerED (2007) The Origin of Wealth. London: Random House Business Books.
6.
BlevinsJLBrownDH (2006) Political issue or policy matter? The US Federal Communications Commission’s third biennial review of broadcast ownership rules. Journal of Communication Inquiry30 (1): 21–41.
7.
BrusoniSPrencipeA (2001) Unpacking the black box of modularity: Technologies, products and organizations. Industrial and Corporate Change10 (1): 179–205.
8.
CunninghamM (1998) Good Vibrations: A History of Record Production, 2nd edn.London: Sanctuary Publishing.
9.
Dal BóE (2006) Regulatory capture: A review. Oxford Review of Economic Policy22 (2): 203–225.
10.
Den HertogPBilderbeekR (2000) The new knowledge infrastructure: The role of technology-based knowledge-intensive business services in national innovation systems. In: BodenMMilesI (eds) Services and the Knowledge-Based Economy. London and New York: Continuum, 222–246.
11.
DrewR (2005) Mixed blessings: The commercial mix and the future of music aggregation. Popular Music and Society26 (4): 533–551.
12.
FlewT (2007) Understanding Global Media. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
FullbrookE (2004) A Guide to What’s Wrong with Economics. London: Anthem Press.
14.
GadreyFG (2000) The characterization of goods and services: An alternative approach. Review of Income and Wealth46 (3): 369–387.
15.
GalloujF (2002) Innovation in services and the attendant old and new myths. Journal of Socio-Economics31 (2): 137–154.
16.
Georgescu-RoegenN (1971) Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Lincoln, NE: iUniverse.com, Inc.
17.
GomeryD (2004) The economics of Hollywood: Money and media. In: AlexanderAOwersJCarvethRHollifieldACGrecoAN (eds) Media Economics: Theory and Practice, 3rd edn.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 193–206.
18.
HillP (1999) Tangibles, intangibles and services: A new taxonomy for the classification of output. Canadian Journal of Economics32 (2): 426–446.
19.
HodgsonGM (2004) Can economics start from the individual alone? In: FullbrookE (ed.) A Guide to What’s Wrong with Economics. London: Anthem Press, 57–67.
IFPI (International Federation of Phonographic Industries). (2009) Digital Music Report 2009: New Business Models for a Changing Environment. Available at:www.ifpi.org/content/library/DMR2009-real.pdf.
22.
IFPI (International Federation of Phonographic Industries). (2010) Digital Music Report 2010: Music How, When, Where You Want. Available at:www.ifpi.org/content/library/DMR2010.pdf.
23.
IFPI (International Federation of Phonographic Industries). (2011) Recording Industry in Numbers. London: IFPI.
24.
KüngLPicardRGTowseR (2008) The Internet and the Mass Media. London: Sage.
25.
McChesneyRW (1999) Noam Chomsky and the struggle against neoliberalism. Monthly Review50 (11): 40–47.
26.
McChesneyRW (2001) Global media, neoliberalism, and imperialism. Monthly Review52 (19): 1–19.
27.
MansellR (2004) Political economy, power and new media. New Media and Society6 (1): 96–105.
28.
MilesI (2003) Services and the knowledge-based economy. In: TiddJ (ed.) Service Innovation: Organizational Responses to Technological Opportunities and Market Imperatives. London: Imperial College Press, 81 - 112.
29.
NelsonR (1982) The role of knowledge in R&D efficiency. Quarterly Journal of Economics 97 ( 3): 453 - 470.
30.
NelsonRWinterSG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
31.
NurseK (2001) The Caribbean Music Industry. Barbados: Caribbean Export Development Agency.
32.
PavittKLR (2005) Specialization and system integration: Where manufacture and services still meet. In: PrencipeADaviesAHobdayM (eds) The Business of Systems Integration, 2nd edn. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 78 - 91.
33.
PicardR (1989) Media Economics: Concepts and Issues. London: Sage.
34.
RogersJSparvieroS (2010) Re-thinking change in the music industry system: A pluralist economic viewpoint. Papers presented at the International Association of Media and Communication Research (IAMCR) conference ‘Communication and Citizenship - Rethinking Crisis and Change’, Braga, Portugal, 18-22July.
35.
ShepherdWG (1975) The Treatment of Market Power: Antitrust, Regulation and Public Enterprise. New York: Columbia University Press.
SolowRM (1985) Economic history and economics. American Economic Review75 (2): 328–331.
39.
StiglerGJ (1984) Economics: The imperial science?Scandinavian Journal of Economics86 (3): 301–313.
40.
ThébergeP (2001) Plugged in: Technology and popular music. In: FrithSStrawWStreetJ (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Rock and Pop. Cambridge: University Press, 3–25.
41.
The Economist (2009) Where it went wrong and how the crisis is changing it. 16 July.
