This study explored parasocial relationships (PSRs) with Harry Potter that readers from different cultures have developed. An overall sample of 2551 Potter fans from Germany (individualistic culture) and Mexico (collectivistic culture) completed an online questionnaire assessing their parasocial relationship with the character. Fans from the collectivistic culture rated Potter’s sociability higher than fans from the individualistic culture. For fans from both cultures, social attraction turned out as most important determinant of PSRs with Potter, while homophily ranked lowest. Overall, PSRs and fandom turned out to be quite similar across cultures, with some differences in character perception and relative importance of social attraction. Implications for parasocial relationships as (inter)cultural phenomena and cross-cultural appreciation of media entertainment are discussed.
Algoe SB and Haidt J.(2009) Witnessing excellence in action: The ‘other-praising’ emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. Journal of Positive Psychology4(2): 105-127.
2.
Baron A. ( 1997) Social Psychology. Boston, MA : Allyn and Bacon.
3.
Bartlett FC ( 1932) Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Beeden A. and De Bruin J.(2010) The Office. Articulations of national identity in television format adaption. Television and New Media11(1): 3-19.
5.
Blakley J. ( 2001) Entertainment Goes Global: Mass Culture in a Transforming World. Available at: www.learcenter.org/pdf/EntGlobal.pdf
6.
Eyal K. and Cohen J. ( 2006) When good friends say goodbye: A parasocial breakup study . Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media50(3): 502-523.
7.
Eyal K. and Rubin AM ( 2003) Viewer aggression and homophily, identification, and parasocial relationships with television characters. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media47(1): 77-98.
8.
Fisherkeller J. ( 1997) Everyday learning about identities among young adolescents in television culture. Anthropology and Education Quarterly28(4): 467-492.
9.
Fiske ST and Taylor SE ( 1991) Social Cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10.
Forgas JP ( 1983) What is social about social cognition? British Journal of Social Psychology22: 129-144.
11.
Giles D. ( 2002) Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology4(3): 279-305.
12.
Gleich U. ( 1996) Sind Fernsehpersonen die ‘Freunde’ des Zuschauers? Ein Vergleich zwischen parasozialen und realen sozialen Beziehungen [Are media figures ‘friends’ of the viewers? A comparison between parasocial and real social relationships]. In: Vorderer P (ed.) Fernsehen als ‘Beziehungskiste’: Parasoziale Beziehungen und Interaktionen mit TV-Personen. Opladen : Westdeutscher Verlag, 113-144.
13.
Gudykunst WB and Lee C. ( 2003) Cross-cultural communication theories. In: Gudykunst WB (ed.) Handbook of International and Intercultural Communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 25-50.
14.
Harkness J. ( 2003) Questionnaire translation. In: Harkness J, Van de Vijver F and Mohler PP (eds) Cross-Cultural Survey Methods. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley , 35-56.
15.
Hartmann T., Schramm H. and Klimmt C. ( 2004) Personenorientierte Medienrezeption: Ein Zwei-Ebenen-Modell parasozialer Interaktionen [Person-oriented media reception: A two-level model of parasocial interactions]. Publizistik49(1): 25-47.
16.
Hartmann T., Stuke D. and Daschmann G. ( 2008) Positive parasocial relationships with drivers affect suspense in racing sport. Journal of Media Psychology20(1): 24-34.
17.
Havens T. ( 2000) The biggest show in the world: Race and the global popularity of The Cosby Show. Media, Culture and Society22(4): 371-391.
18.
Hoffner C. ( 1996) Children’s wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media40(3): 389-402.
19.
Hoffner C. and Buchanan M. ( 2005) Young adults’ wishful identification with television characters: The role of perceived similarity and character attributes . Media Psychology7(4): 325-351.
20.
Hoffner C. and Cantor J. ( 1991) Perceiving and responding to mass media characters . In: Bryant J and Zillmann D (eds) Responding to the Screen: Reception and Reaction Processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 63-101.
21.
Hofstede G. ( 2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Hofstede G. ( 2004) Business cultures. In: Jandt FE (ed.) Intercultural Communication: A Global Reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 8-12.
23.
Hoorn JF and Konijn EA ( 2003) Perceiving and experiencing fictional characters: An integrative account. Japanese Psychological Research45(4): 250-268.
24.
Horton D. and Wohl RR ( 1956) Mass communication and parasocial interaction: Observation on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry19(3): 185-206.
25.
IP. (2008) Television2008. International Key Facts. Wiesbaden : Media DatenVerlag.
26.
Katz E. and Foulkes D. ( 1962) On the use of mass media for escape: Clarification of a concept. Public Opinion Quarterly26(3): 377-388.
27.
Kim H. and Markus HR ( 1999) Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology77(4): 785-800.
28.
Kim U. ( 1994) Individualism and collectivism: Conceptual clarification and elaboration. In: Kim U, Triandis HC, Kagiticibasi C, Choi S-C and Yoon G (eds) Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications, Vol. 18, Cross-Cultural Research and Methodology Series. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 19-40.
29.
Klimmt C., Hartmann T. and Schramm H. ( 2006) Parasocial interactions and relationships. In: Bryant J and Vorderer P (eds) Psychology of Entertainment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 291-313.
30.
Liebes T. ( 1988) Cultural differences in the retelling of television fiction . Critical Studies in Mass Communication5(4): 277-292.
31.
Liebes T. and Katz E. ( 1986) Patterns of involvement in television fiction: A comparative analysis. European Journal of Communication1(2): 151-171.
32.
Liebes T. and Katz E. ( 1993) The Export of Meaning: Cross-Cultural Readings of Dallas . Cambridge: Polity Press .
33.
Lonner WJ and Berry JW (eds) (1986) Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
34.
McCroskey JC and McCain TA ( 1974) The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs41: 261-266.
35.
McCroskey JC, Richmond VP and Daly JA ( 1975) The development of a measure of perceived homophily in interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research1(4): 323-332.
36.
Markus H. and Kitayama S. ( 1991) Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review98(2): 224-253.
37.
Matsumoto D. ( 2004) The role of individualism-collectivism in future cross-cultural research. Cross-Cultural Psychology Bulletin38(3): 10-18.
38.
Matsumoto D. and Juang L. ( 2004) Culture and Psychology. Belmont, CA : Wadsworth/Thomson.
39.
Nabi RL, Biely EN, Morgan SJ and Stitt CR ( 2003) Reality-based TV programming and the psychology of its appeal. Media Psychology5(4): 303-330.
40.
Nisbett RE, Peng K., Choi I. and Norenzayan A. ( 2001) Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review108(2): 291-310.
41.
Oyserman D., Coon HM and Kemmelmeier M. ( 2002) Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin128(1): 3-72.
42.
Palmer MT and Barnett GA ( 1984) Using a spatial model to verify language translation . In: Gudykunst WB and Kim YY (eds) Methods for Intercultural Communication Research: International and Intercultural Communication Annual Volume VIII. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 129-146.
43.
Perse EM and Rubin RB ( 1989) Attribution in social and parasocial relationships . Communication Research16(1): 59-77.
44.
Rubin RB and McHugh MP ( 1987) Development of parasocial interaction relationships . Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media31(3): 279-292.
45.
Schramm H. and Hartmann T. ( 2008) The PSI-Process Scales: A new measure to assess the intensity and breadth of parasocial processes. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research33(4): 385-401.
46.
Smith PB and Bond MH ( 1998) Social Psychology across Cultures. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
47.
Straubhaar JD ( 1991) Beyond media imperialism: Asymmetrical interdependence and cultural proximity. Critical Studies in Mass Communication8(5): 39-59.
48.
Trepte S. ( 2008) Cultural proximity in TV entertainment: An eight-country study on the relationship of nationality and the evaluation of US prime-time fiction. Communications. The European Journal of Communication33(1): 1-26.
49.
Triandis HC ( 1995) Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
50.
Triandis HC and Suh EM ( 2002) Cultural influences on personality. Annual Review of Psychology53: 133-160.
51.
Triandis HC, McCusker C. and Hui CH ( 1990) Multi-method probes of individualism-collectivism . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology59(5): 1006-1020.
52.
Turner JR ( 1993) Interpersonal and psychological predictors of parasocial interaction with different television performers. Communication Quarterly41(4): 443-453.
53.
Visscher A. and Vorderer P. ( 1998) Freunde in guten und schlechten Zeiten. Parasoziale Beziehungen von Vielsehern zu Charakteren einer Daily Soap. In: Willems H and Jurga M (eds) Inszenierungsgesellschaft [Stage Society]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 453-469.
54.
Vorderer P. ( 1996) Picard, Brinkmann, Derrick und Co. Als Freunde der Zuschauer. Eine explorative Studie über parasoziale Beziehungen zu Serienfiguren . In: Vorderer P (ed.) Fernsehen als Beziehungskiste [Television as ‘Relationship Box’] . Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag , 153-171.
55.
Vorderer P. and Knobloch S. ( 1996) Parasoziale Beziehungen zu Serienfiguren: Ergänzung oder Ersatz? [Parasocial relationships to characters of TV series: Completion or replacement?]Medienpsychologie8(3): 201-216.
56.
Vorderer P., Klimmt C. and Ritterfeld U. ( 2004) Enjoyment: At the heart of media entertainment . Communication Theory14(4): 388-408.
