/ Rooted in what are already disparate programs of regulatory intervention, the European Union and the United States have identified differently their current challenges in telecommunications policy. This study describes the development of both regulatory frameworks through their philosophical roots and ideological transitions demonstrating how, on the one hand, American influences have affected the European policy language, but, on the other, the European policies have better implemented the same policies and as a result are being seen as contributing to higher levels of broadband penetration. This time around, it seems that attending to the strengths of the European process may help policy-makers in the US reformulate their own home-grown policies.
Anttiroiko, A. (2001) `Toward the European Information Society', Communications of the ACM44(1): 31-5.
2.
Bangemann, M. (1994) `Recommendations to the European Council: Europe and the Global Information Society'; at: europa.eu.int/ISPO/infosoc/backg/bangeman.htm
3.
Bauer, J. (1998) `Universal Service in theEuropean Union', Government Information Quarterly16(4): 329-43.
4.
Bauer, J. (2003) `Prospects and Limits of Comparative Research in Communications Policy-Making', paper presented at the 31st Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, Arlington, VA, September.
5.
Bauer, J., M. Berne and C. Maitland (2002) `Internet Access in the European Union and in the United States', Telematics and Informatics19(2): 117-37.
6.
Bourreau, M. and P. Dogan (2004) `Service-Based vs Facility-Based Competition in Local Access Networks', Information Economics and Policy16(2): 287-306.
7.
Bushkin, A. and J. Yurow (1980) The Foundations of the United States Information Policy: A United States Government Submission to the High-Level Conference on Information, Computer, and Communications Policy. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.
8.
Cannon, R. (2005) `The Legacy of the Federal Communications Commission's Computer Inquiries', Federal Communications Law Journal55(2): 168-206.
9.
Cherry, B. (1999) `Rate Rebalancing Policy: Institutional Factors Favoring Reform in the European Union over the US', paper presented at the 27th Telecommunications Policy Research Conference , Alexandria, VA, September.
10.
Doyle, C. (2000) `Local Loop Unbundling and Regulatory Risk', Journal of Network Industries1: 33-54.
11.
Frieden, R. (2005) `Lessons from Broadband Development in Canada, Japan, Korea and the United States', Telecommunications Policy29(8): 595-613.
12.
Fuke, H. (2003) `Evaluation of New Regulatory Framework of European Union - from Japanese Perspective', paper presented at the 14th ITS European Regional Conference Helsinki, Finland, 23-24 August.
13.
Garcia-Murillo, M. (2005) `International Broadband Deployment: The Impact of Unbundling: Unbundling Facing New Challenges', Communications and Strategies57: 83-105.
14.
Garnham, N. (2001) `Universal Service', pp. 199-204 in W. Melody (ed.) Telecom Reform: Principles, Policies and Regulatory Practices. Lyngsby: Technical University of Denmark.
15.
Gideon, C. (2006) `Technology Policy by Default: Shaping Communications Technology through Regulatory Policy', pp. 256-72 in D. Guston and D. Sarewitz (eds) Shaping Science and Technology Policy: The Next Generation of Research. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
16.
Homet, R. (1976) Politics, Cultures, and Communication: European vs American Approaches to Communications Policymaking. New York: Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies.
17.
Kiessling, T. and Y. Blondeel (1998) `The EU Regulatory Framework in Telecommunications: A Critical Analysis', Telecommunications Policy22(7): 571-92.
18.
Kim, J., J. Bauer and S. Wildman (2003) `Broadband Uptake in OECD Countries: Policy Lessons from Comparative Statistical Analysis', paper prepared for presentation at the 31st Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy, Arlington, VA, 19-21 September; at: tprc.org/papers/2003/203/Kim-Bauer-Wildman.pdf
19.
Kubicek, H., W. Dutton and R. Williams (eds) (2001) The Social Shaping of Information Superhighways: European and American Roads to the Information Society. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag/St Martin's Press.
20.
Levy, D. (1999) Europe's Digital Revolution: Broadcasting Regulation, the EU and the Nation State. London: Routledge.
21.
Livingstone, S. (2003) `On the Challenges of Cross National Comparative Research', European Journal of Communication18(4): 477-500.
22.
Marcus, J. (2002) `The Potential Relevance to the United States of the European Union's Newly Adopted Regulatory Framework for Telecommunications' ; at: hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224213A2.pdf
23.
Marcus, J. (2005) `Broadband Adoption in Europe', IEEE Communications Magazine18-20; at: www.comsoc.org/ci1/Public/2005/apr/
24.
Melody, W. (1999) `Telecom Reform: Progress and Prospects', Telecommunications Policy23: 7-34.
25.
Michalis, M. (2002) `The Debate over Universal Service in the European Union: Plus Ça Change, Plus C'est la Meme Chose', Convergence8(2): 80-98.
26.
Mueller, M. (1997) Universal Service. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
Pool, I. (1983) Technologies of Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
28.
Redford, E. (1969) The Regulatory Process. Austin : University of Texas Press.
29.
Sandholtz, W. (1993) `Institutions and Collective Action: The New Telecommunications in Western Europe', World Politics45: 242-70.
30.
Sandholtz, W. (1996) `Emergence of a Supranational Telecommunications Regime', Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Columbia International Affairs Online; at: www.ciaonet.org/wps/saw02/index.html (accessed 17 August 2006).
31.
Schement, J. and M. Mueller (1996) `Universal Service from the Bottom Up: A Study of Telephone Penetration in Camden, New Jersey', The Information Society12(3): 273-92.
32.
Schneider, V. (2001) `Different Roads to the Information Society? Comparing US and European Approaches from a Public Policy Perspective', pp. 339-58 in H. Kubicek, W. Dutton and R. Williams (eds) The Social Shaping of Information Superhighways: European and American Roads to the Information Society. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag/St Martin's Press.
33.
Servaes, J. and J.-C. Burgelman (2000) `In Search of a European Model for the Information Society', Telematics and Informatics17: 1-7.
34.
Simpson, S. (2004) `Universal Service Issues in Converging Communications Environments: The Case of the UK', Telecommunications Policy28(3-4): 233-48.
35.
Skogerbø, E. and T. Storsul (2000) `Prospects for Expanded Universal Service in Europe: The Cases of Denmark, the Netherlands, and Norway', The Information Society16: 135-46.
36.
Spiller, P. and S. Ulset (2003) `Why Local Loop Unbundling Fails?', paper presented at the Nordic Workshop on Transaction Cost Economics in Business Administration, Bergen, Norway, 20-21 June; at: mora.rente.nhh.no/conferences/TCEWorkshop2003/papers/Ulset_Spiller.pdf
37.
Streeter, T. (1990) `Beyond Freedom of Speech and the Public Interest: The Relevance of Critical Legal Studies to Communications Policy', Journal of Communication40(2): 43-63.
38.
Van Zon, H. (2005) `The Variety of Information Society Development Paths in Central Europe', AI and Society19(3): 309-26.
39.
Waverman, L. and E. Sirel (1997) `European Telecommunications Markets on the Verge of Full Liberalization', Journal of Economic Perspectives11(4): 113-26.
