In this paper, a competing risks model is analyzed based on improved adaptive type-II progressive censored sample (IAT-II PCS). Two independent competing causes of failures are considered. It is assumed that lifetimes of the competing causes of failure follow exponential distributions with different means. Maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) for the unknown model parameters are obtained. Using asymptotic normality property of MLE, the asymptotic confidence intervals are constructed. Existence and uniqueness properties of the MLEs are studied. Further, bootstrap confidence intervals are computed. The Bayes estimators are obtained under symmetric and asymmetric loss functions with non-informative and informative priors. For informative priors, independent gamma distributions are considered. Highest posterior density (HPD) credible intervals are obtained. A Monte Carlo simulation study is carried out to compare performance of the established estimates. Furthermore, three different optimality criteria are proposed to obtain the optimal censoring plan. Finally, a real-life data set is considered for illustrative purposes.
EpsteinB. Truncated life tests in the exponential case. Ann Math Stat1954; 25(3): 555–564.
5.
ChildsAChandrasekarBBalakrishnanN, et al. Exact likelihood inference based on Type-I and Type-II hybrid censored samples from the exponential distribution. Ann Inst Stat Math2003; 55(2): 319–330.
6.
CohenAC. Progressively censored samples in life testing. Technometrics1963; 5(3): 327–339.
7.
BalakrishnanNKannanNLinCT, et al. Point and interval estimation for Gaussian distribution, based on progressively Type-II censored samples. IEEE Trans Reliab2003; 52(1): 90–95.
8.
BalakrishnanNKunduD. Hybrid censoring: models, inferential results and applications. Comput Stat Data Anal2013; 57(1): 166–209.
9.
RastogiMKTripathiYM. Estimating the parameters of a Burr distribution under progressive type II censoring. Stat Methodol2012; 9(3): 381–391.
10.
KunduDJoarderA. Analysis of Type-II progressively hybrid censored data. Comput Stat Data Anal2006; 50(10): 2509–2528.
11.
LinCTNgHKTChanPS. Statistical inference of Type-II progressively hybrid censored data with Weibull lifetimes. Commun Stat2009; 38(10): 1710–1729.
12.
LinCTChouCCHuangYL. Inference for the Weibull distribution with progressive hybrid censoring. Comput Stat Data Anal2012; 56(3): 451–467.
13.
HemmatiFKhorramE. Statistical analysis of the log-normal distribution under type-II progressive hybrid censoring schemes. Commun Stat Simul Comput2013; 42(1): 52–75.
14.
TomerSKPanwarMS. Estimation procedures for Maxwell distribution under type-I progressive hybrid censoring scheme. J Stat Comput Simul2015; 85(2): 339–356.
15.
DuttaSKayalS. Estimation of parameters of the logistic exponential distribution under progressive type-I hybrid censored sample. Qual Technol Quant Manag2022; 19(2): 234–258.
16.
NgHKTKunduDChanPS. Statistical analysis of exponential lifetimes under an adaptive Type-II progressive censoring scheme. Nav Res Logist2009; 56(8): 687–698.
17.
YeZSChanPSXieM, et al. Statistical inference for the extreme value distribution under adaptive Type-II progressive censoring schemes. J Stat Comput Simul2014; 84(5): 1099–1114.
18.
SobhiMMASolimanAA. Estimation for the exponentiated Weibull model with adaptive Type-II progressive censored schemes. Appl Math Model2016; 40(2): 1180–1192.
19.
EL-SagheerRMMahmoudMAWAbdallahSHM. Statistical inferences for new Weibull-Pareto distribution under an adaptive type-II progressive censored data. J Stat Manag Syst2018; 21(6): 1021–1057.
20.
YanWLiPYuY. Statistical inference for the reliability of Burr-XII distribution under improved adaptive Type-II progressive censoring distribution under improved adaptive Type-II progressive censor. Appl Math Model2021; 95: 38–52.
21.
KunduDBasuS. Analysis of incomplete data in presence of competing risks. J Stat Plan Inference2000; 87(2): 221–239.
22.
KunduDJoarderA. Analysis of type-II progressively hybrid censored competing risks data. J Mod Appl Stat Methods2006; 5(1): 152–170.
23.
SarhanAM. Analysis of incomplete, censored data in competing risks models with generalized exponential distributions. IEEE Trans Reliab2007; 56(1): 132–138.
24.
PareekBKunduDKumarS. On progressively censored competing risks data for Weibull distributions. Comput Stat Data Anal2009; 53(12): 4083–4094.
25.
CramerESchmiedtAB. Progressively type-II censored competing risks data from Lomax distributions. Comput Stat Data Anal2011; 55(3): 1285–1303.
26.
WangL. Inference of progressively censored competing risks data from Kumaraswamy distributions. J Comput Appl Math2018; 343: 719–736.
27.
AhmedEAAli AlhussainZSalahMM, et al. Inference of progressively type-II censored competing risks data from Chen distribution with an application. J Appl Stat2020; 47(13–15): 2492–2524.
28.
HuaRGuiW. Revisit to progressively Type-II censored competing risks data from Lomax distributions. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2022; 236: 377–394.
29.
Moharib AlsarrayRMKazempoorJAhmadi NadiA. Monitoring the Weibull shape parameter under progressive censoring in presence of independent competing risks. J Appl Stat. Epub ahead of print 25November2021. DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2021.2003760.
30.
MahmoudMRMuhammedHZEl-SaeedAR. Inference for generalized inverted exponential distribution under progressive Type-I censoring scheme in presence of competing risks model. Sankhya A. Epub ahead of print 6January2021. DOI: 10.1007/s13171-020-00227-y.
31.
RenJGuiW. Inference and optimal censoring scheme for progressively Type-II censored competing risks model for generalized Rayleigh distribution. Comput Stat2021; 36(1): 479–513.
32.
NassrSGAlmetwallyEMEl AzmWSA. Statistical inference for the extended Weibull distribution based on adaptive type-II progressive hybrid censored competing risks data. Thai Stat2021; 19(3): 547–564.
33.
VarianHR. A Bayesian approach to real estate assessment. In: FienbergSEZellnerA (eds) Studies in Bayesian econometric and statistics: in honor of Leonard J. Savage. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1975, pp.195–208.
34.
DeySSinghSTripathiYM, et al. Estimation and prediction for a progressively censored generalized inverted exponential distribution. Stat Methodol2016; 32: 185–202.
35.
XiaZPYuJYChengLD, et al. Study on the breaking strength of jute fibres using modified Weibull distribution. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2009; 40(1): 54–59.
