Because steel rail is one of the most fundamental components of railway operations, the accurate estimation of residual rail service life is of great significance in ensuring the safe operation of railways. In addition, maintenance expenses must be minimized in a manner that allows limited railroad resources to be optimally allotted. In this study, the typical types of continuous rail segments on a rail line are classified into non-sharply curved rail segments and sharply curved rail segments. Using these classifications, a model for estimating the residual service lives of rail segments using a discrete-state conditional probability method is proposed based on an analysis of rail deterioration characteristics. The model considers several heterogeneous factors to determine their influence on the deterioration process and is shown to be capable of estimating the residual service lives of rail segments. Finally, the model is validated through a case study of the Beijing Metro, using inspection records of rail defects in conjunction with heterogeneous factor data to predict the service life of the rail, which is then compared with its actual service life. The model is found to show good agreement with the rail inspection and maintenance records of the Beijing Metro, indicating its appropriateness for use by railroad management in allocating future rail maintenance resources.
The Railway Ministry of People’s Republic of China. China railway yearbook. 1st ed. Beijing, China: China Railway Publishing House, 2013.
3.
AglanHGanYX.Fatigue crack growth analysis of a premium rail steel. J Mater Sci2001; 36(2): 389–397.
4.
Dang VanKMaitournamMH. On some recent trends in modelling of contact fatigue and wear in rail. Wear2002; 253: 219–227.
5.
RingsbergJWFranklinFJJosefsonBLet al. Fatigue evaluation of surface coated railway rails using shakedown theory, finite element calculations, and lab and field trials. Int J Fatigue2005; 27(6): 680–694.
6.
JinXSWenZFXiaoXBet al. A numerical method for prediction of curved rail wear. Multibody Syst Dyn2007; 18(4): 531–557.
7.
KalkerJJ.Three-dimensional elastic bodies in rolling contact. 1st ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990.
8.
TorstenssonPTSchilkeM.Rail corrugation growth on small radius curves: measurements and validation of a numerical prediction model. Wear2013; 303: 381–396.
9.
PopovićZLazarevićLBrajovićLJet al. Managing rail service life. Metalurgija2014; 140(10): 721–724.
10.
RomanoSManentiDBerettaSet al. Semi-probabilistic method for residual lifetime of aluminothermic welded rails with foot cracks. Theor Appl Fract Mec2016; 85(85): 398–411.
11.
MaiSHGravouilANguyen-TajanMLet al. Numerical simulation of rolling contact fatigue crack growth in rails with the rail bending and the frictional contact. Eng Fract Mech2017; 174: 196–206.
12.
DickCTBarkanCPLChapmanERet al. Multivariate statistical model for predicting occurrence and location of broken rails. Transport Res Rec2003; 1825: 48–55.
13.
SchaferDHIIBarkanCPL. A prediction model for broken rails and an analysis of their economic impact. In: Proceedings of the American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association annual conference, Salt Lake City, UT, US, 21–24 September 2008, pp.1–32. Lanham, USA: AREMA.
14.
KumarS.A study of the rail degradation process to predict rail breaks. PhD Thesis, Lulea University of Technology, Lulea, 2006.
15.
ChattopadhyayGKumarS.Parameter estimation for rail degradation model. Int J Perform Eng2009; 5(2): 119–130.
16.
ZhaoJMChanAHCBurrowMPN. Probabilistic model for predicting rail breaks and controlling risk of derailment. Transport Res Rec2007; 1995: 76–83.
17.
VeskovićSTepićJIvićMet al. Model for predicting the frequency of broken rails. Metalurgija2012; 51(2): 221–224.
18.
ZakeriJAShahriariS.Developing a deterioration probabilistic model for rail wear. Int J Traffic Transport Eng2012; 1(2): 13–18.
19.
MishalaniRGMadanatSM.Computation of infrastructure transition probabilities using stochastic duration models. J Infrastruct Syst2002; 8(4): 139–148.
KobayashiKDoMHanD.Estimation of Markovian transition probabilities for pavement deterioration forecasting. KSCE J Civ Eng2010; 14(3): 343–351.
22.
HanDKaitoKKobayashiK.Application of Bayesian estimation method with Markov hazard model to improve deterioration forecasts for infrastructure asset management. KSCE J Civ Eng2014; 18(7): 2107–2119.
23.
MorcousG.Performance prediction of bridge deck systems using Markov chains. J Perform Constr Fac2006; 20(2): 146–155.
24.
TsudaYKaitoKAokiKet al. Estimating Markovian transition probabilities for bridge deterioration forecasting. Struct Eng Earthquake Eng2006; 23(2): 241–256.
25.
WellalageNKWZhangTLDwightR. Calibrating Markov chain-based deterioration models for predicting future conditions of railway bridge elements. J Bridge Eng2015; 20(2): 04014060.
26.
HasanMSSetungeSLawDWet al. Forecasting deterioration of bridge components from visual inspection data. Int J Eng Tech2015; 7(1): 40–44.
27.
KleinerY.Scheduling inspection and renewal of large infrastructure assets. J Infrastruct Syst2001; 7(4): 136–143.
28.
MicevskiTKuczeraGCoombesP.Markov model for storm water pipe deterioration. J Infrastruct Syst2002; 8(2): 49–56.
29.
BaikHSJeongHSAbrahamDM.Estimating transition probabilities in Markov chain-based deterioration models for management of wastewater systems. J Water Res Plan Man2006; 132(1): 15–24.
30.
AnaEVBauwensW.Modeling the structural deterioration of urban drainage pipes: the state-of-the-art in statistical methods. Urban Water J2010; 7(1): 47–59.
31.
LyngbyNHokstadPVatnJ. RAMS management of railway tracks. In: MisraKB (ed.) Handbook of performability engineering. 1st ed. London: Springer-Verlag, 2008, pp.1123–1145.
32.
BaiLLiuRKSunQXet al. Markov-based model for the prediction of railway track irregularities. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2015; 229(2): 150–159.
33.
PrescottDAndrewsJ.Investigating railway track asset management using a Markov analysis. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2015; 229(4): 402–416.
34.
KobayashiKKaitoKLethanhN.A statistical deterioration forecasting method using hidden Markov model for infrastructure management. Transport Res B: Meth2012; 46(4): 544–561.
35.
Durango-CohenPLMadanatSM.Optimization of inspection and maintenance decisions for infrastructure facilities under performance model uncertainty: a quasi-Bayes approach. Transport Res A: Pol2008; 42(8): 1074–1085.
36.
AokiKYamamotoKKobayashiK. Optimal inspection and replacement policy using stochastic method for deterioration prediction. In: 11th world conference on transport research, Berkeley, CA, 24–28 June 2007, paper no. 01129274, pp.1–13. Leeds: WCTRS.
37.
KobayashiKKaitoKLethanhN.Deterioration forecasting model with multistage Weibull hazard functions. J Infrastruct Syst2010; 16(4): 282–291.
38.
AudleyMAndrewsJ.The effects of tamping on railway track geometry degradation. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2013; 227(4): 376–391.
39.
BaiWFLiuRKSunQXet al. A stochastic model for the estimation of renewal periods of sharply curved metro rails. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2018; 232: 572–588.
40.
The Railway Ministry of People’s Republic of China. Rules of railway track maintenance. 1st ed. Beijing, China: China Railway Publishing House, 2007.
41.
SoleimanmeigouniIAhmadiAKumarU.Track geometry degradation and maintenance modelling: a review. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2018; 232(1): 73–102.
42.
GreeneWH.Econometric analysis. 7th ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2011.
43.
AllisonPD.Survival analysis using the SAS system: a practical guide. 2nd ed.Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 2010.
44.
QB(J)/BDY(A)XL003-2009:2009. Beijing metro track maintenance rules.
