A new approach to assess the risk associated with jetfire and poolfire accidents on an offshore oil facility using cellular automata is presented. This model simulates many accident scenarios, and the related evacuation processes, adopting a Monte Carlo approach in order to evaluate an average consequence and then a more realistic value of the risk associated with these accidents. The results of this new method are discussed and compared with the results obtained from a traditional approach over a real case study. The comparison shows that this new approach supplies lower risk-related results, still being conservative; besides, it can supply further information useful in the design phase.
BerchaFG. Arctic offshore escape, evacuation, and rescue. In: Proceedings of the 17th IAHR international symposium on ice, Saint Petersburg, 21–25 June 2004.
2.
Occupational risk. OGP risk assessment data directory report no. 434—12, March2010. London: International Association of Oil & Gas Producers.
3.
RathnayakaSKhanFAmayotteP. Accident modeling and risk assessment framework for safety critical decision-making: application to deepwater drilling operation. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2013; 227(1): 86–105.
4.
KolenBKokMHelslootI. EvacuAid: a probabilistic model to determine the expected loss of life for different mass evacuation strategies during flood threats. Risk Anal2012; 33: 1312–1333.
NORSOK Standard Z-013. Risk and emergency preparedness analysis. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Technology Centre (NTS)2001.
7.
SpougeJ. A guide to quantitative risk assessment for offshore installations (publication 99/100a). London: DNV Technica, 1999.
8.
Van den BoschCJHWeteringsRAPM. Methods for the calculation of physical effects—due to releases of hazardous materials (liquid and gases): yellow book. 3rd ed.The Hague, The Netherlands: TNO, 2005.
KirchnerASchadschneiderA. Simulation of evacuation processes using a bionics-inspired cellular automaton model for pedestrian dynamics. Physica A2002; 312: 260–276.
11.
RohM-IHaS. Advanced ship evacuation analysis using a cell-based simulation model. Comput Ind2012; 64: 80–89.
12.
ZhangXLiXHadjisophocleousG. A probabilistic occupant evacuation model for fire emergencies using Monte Carlo methods. Fire Safety J2013; 58: 15–24.
13.
KluepfelHL. A cellular automaton model for crowd movement and egress simulation. Doctoral Dissertation, Fakultät für Physik, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, 2003.
14.
HelbingDFarkasIJMolnarP. Simulation of pedestrian crowds in normal and evacuation situations. In: SchreckenbergMSharmaSD (eds) Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2002, pp.21–58.
15.
BursteddeCKlauckKSchadschneiderA. Simulation of pedestrian dynamics using a 2-dimensional cellular automaton. Physica A2001; 295: 507.
16.
WangJLoSWangQ. Risk of large-scale evacuation based on the effectiveness of rescue strategies under different crowd densities. Risk Anal2012; 33: 1553–1563.
17.
DeaconTAmyottePRKhanFI. A framework for human error analysis of offshore evacuations. Safety Sci2012; 51: 319–327.
18.
HaSKuNRohM-I. Evacuation, escape and rescue EER analysis of offshore plant based on human behaviour model. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering, San Francisco, CA, 8–13 June 2014. New York: ASME.
19.
MatelliniDBWallADJenkinsonID. A study of human reaction during the initial stages of a dwelling fire using Bayesian network model. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2013; 227(2): 207–221.
20.
GinnisAIKostasKVPolitisCG. VELOS: a VR platform for ship-evacuation analysis. Comput Aided Design2010; 42: 1045–1058.
21.
Grand BlancM. A cellular automaton model for offshore evacuation risk assessment. Master’s Thesis, Dipartimento Energia, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, 2014.
