Advancement in living probabilistic safety assessment to increase safety of nuclear power plants

Abstract

Among the energy resources, the energy obtained from nuclear power plants is very important for the prosperity of any country. Living probabilistic safety assessment is a growing field that provides a high level of safety for nuclear power plants. Living probabilistic safety assessment consists of different techniques, among them this article presents a method to update reliability data. This method is based on Binomial likelihood function and its conjugate beta distribution for demand failure probability, and Poisson likelihood function and its conjugate gamma distribution for operational failure rate. The method uses generic data for beta and gamma prior distribution, which is updated by using the reliability data update method. Reliability data update is a computer-based program used to update nuclear power plant data according to changing conditions. By updating the living probabilistic safety assessment it is possible to get an online risk monitor system that can be helpful in severe accident conditions, as in Fukushima accident, to make the man–machine system friendly.

Keywords

Energy safety of nuclear power plants living probabilistic safety assessment risk level operational failure rate demand failure probability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

IAEA international fact finding expert mission of the Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident following the great east Japan earthquake and tsunami. Division of Nuclear Installation Safety, (IAEA), Vienna, Austria, 2011, pp.1–162.

Living probabilistic safety assessment (LPSA). IAEA-TECDOC-1106, 1999, pp.1–30.

Lakner

Anderson

. Reliability engineering for nuclear and other high technology systems, a practical guide. London: Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, 1985.

NUREG/CR- 0492. Fault tree hand book. 1981, pp.1–209. W.E. Vesely, Washington D.C, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Kenarangui

. Event-tree analysis by fuzzy probability. IEEE Trans Reliab 1991; 40: 12–124.

Hong

. An efficient point estimate method for probabilistic analysis. Eng Sys Saf 1998; 52: 161–167.

NUREG/CR- 6823. Handbook of parameter estimation for probabilistic risk assessment. Sandia National Laboratories, ch. 6, 2003. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.

Jiang

Mahadevan

. Bayesian risk-based decision method for model validation under uncertainty. Reliab Engng Sys Saf 2007; 92: 707–718.

Ching

Leu

, Bayesian updating of reliability of civil infrastructure facilities based on condition-state data and fault-tree model. Reliab Engng Sys Saf 2009; 94: 1962–1974.

10.

Hwang

Jae

, Development of web-based reliability data analysis algorithm model and its application. Ann Nuclear Energy 2010; 37: 248–255.

11.

Majdara

Reza

. Development and application of a risk assessment tool. Reliab Engng Sys Saf 2008; 93: 1130–1137.

12.

Carazas

Souza

GFM

, Risk-based decision making method for maintenance policy selection of thermal power plant equipment. Energy 2010; 35: 964–975.

13.

Hashemian

. Applying online monitoring for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control. IEEE Trans Nuclear Sci 2010; 57: 2872–2878.

14.

Zubair

Zhijian

Khan

SUD

. Calculation and updating of reliability parameters in probabilistic safety assessment. J Fusion Energy 2011; 30: 13–15.

15.

NUREG/CR-2728. Interim reliability evaluation program procedure guide, SAND82–1100. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1983, Table 5.1–1.

16.

NUREG/CR-2815. Probabilistic safety analysis procedures guide. Department of Nuclear Energy Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973, 1985, Table c.1.

17.

CClymont

Mclagan

. Diesel generator reliability data and preliminary analysis. Interim report EPRI NP-2433. Electric Power Research Institute, Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304, 1982, Table s-1.

18.

Reliability data book for components in Swedish nuclear power plants. SKI, Sweden: RKS, 1987, Table 40.

19.

NUREG-3831. The in-plant reliability database for nuclear plants components, interim report. Diesel generators, batteries, chargers and inverters. 1985, Table A-1

20.

German Risk Study, Phase B (page F3–86), GRS-72. Cologne: Verlag TUV, 1989.

21.

Wash-1400, Reactor safety study. An assessment of accident risk in US commercial nuclear power plants. Appendix-III, failure data. 1975, table-III 4–2. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.