To make realistic maintenance decisions, it is important that maintenance managers make their preventive replacement decisions based on observations of the condition of their equipment. This study addresses a condition- and age-based replacement decision problem using the complete history of measured condition observations to minimize long-run average cost, maximize long-run average availability, or both. A stochastic filtering process (SFP) is used to estimate the residual lifetime distribution conditional on the history of observed condition information. A long-run average cost model and a long-run average availability model are analysed in order to determine the theorems necessary for calculating the optimum replacement time. To minimize the cost and maximize availability, a multiobjective decision frontier is proposed that will help maintenance managers deal with trade-offs between the two objectives. Finally, numerical examples are presented for each scenario to show the effectiveness of the methods proposed.
JiaoG.ZuoM. J.Comparison of maintenance policies in hazard rate order. In 8th International Conference on Reliability, maintainability and safety, ICRMS, Chengdu, 2009, pp. 224–227.
5.
SheuS. -H.YehR. H.LinY. -B.JuangM. -G.A Bayesian perspective on age replacement with minimal repair. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, 1999, 65, 55–64.
6.
WangW.A model to predict residual life of rolling element bearings given monitored condition information to date. IMA J. Manage. Math., 2002, 13, 3–16.
7.
JardineA. K. S.TsangA. H. C.Maintenance, replacement and reliability: theory and applications, 2006 (CRC Press, Taylor & Francis).
8.
WangW.CarrM. A.Stochastic filtering based data driven approach for residual life prediction and condition based maintenance decision making support. In Prognostics & System Health Management Conference (PHM 2010), Macau, 12–14 January 2010, pp. 1–10.
9.
MakisV.JardineA. K. S.Optimal replacement in the proportional hazards model. INFOR, 1992, 30, 172–183.
10.
LiC.XuhuaC.YongshengB.ZhonghuaC.Age replacement model based condition information. In 8th International Conference on Electronic Measurement and Instruments, ICEMI, 2007, vol. 2, pp. 468–471.
11.
ScarfP. A.A framework for condition monitoring and condition based maintenance. Quality Tech. Quant. Manage., 2007, 4(2), 301–312.
12.
WangW.ZhangW.A model to predict the residual life of aircraft engines based upon oil analysis data. Naval Res. Log., 52(3), 276–284.
13.
CamciF.System maintenance scheduling with prognostics information using genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans. Reliab., 2009, 58(3), 539–552.
14.
WangW.Modelling the probability assessment of the system state using available condition information. IMA J. Manage. Math., 2006, 17(3), 225–234.
15.
LipiT. F.ZuoM. J.LimJ. -H.Optimal replacement decision making using stochastic filtering process to maximize long-run average availability. In World Congress on Engineering asset management (WCEAM), Athens, 28–30 September 2009, pp. 458–463.
16.
SavsarM.Effects of maintenance policies on the productivity of flexible manufacturing cells. Omega, 2006, 34(3), 274–282.
17.
CastroH. F. D.CavalcaK. L.Maintenance resources optimization applied to manufacturing system. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, 2006, 91, 413–420.
18.
FonsecaD. J.ShitalS.MoynihanG. P.An intelligent system for machine replacement policies. Int. J. Soft Comput., 2006, 1(1), 1–7.
19.
SachdevaA.KumarD.KumarP.Planning and optimizing the maintenance of paper production systems in a paper plant. Comp. Indust. Engng., 2008, 55, 817–829.
20.
WangH.A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems. Eur. J. Op. Res., 2002, 139(3), 469–489.
21.
CastanierB.BérenguerC.GrallA.A sequential condition-based repair/replacement policy with non-periodic inspections for a system subject to continuous wear. App. Stoch. Models Business Ind., 2003, 19(4), 327–347.
BaxterL. A.KijimaM.TortorellaM.A point process model for the reliability of a maintained system subject to general repair. Comm. Stat. – Stoch. Models, 1996, 12, 37–65.
24.
DijouxY.GaudoinO.The alert-delay competing risks model for maintenance analysis. J. Stat. Plan. Infer., 2009, 139 (5), 1587–1603.
Coolen-SchrijnerP.CoolenF. P. A.On optimality criteria for age replacement. Proc. IMechE, Part O: J. Risk and Reliability, 2006, 220(1), 21–29. DOI: 10.1243/1748006XJRR110.1243/1748006XJRR1.
27.
Coolen-SchrijnerP.CoolenF. P. A.ShawS. C.Nonparametric adaptive opportunity-based age replacement strategies. J. Op. Res. Soc., 2006, 57, 63–81.
28.
Coolen-SchrijnerP.CoolenF. P. A.Nonparametric adaptive age replacement with a one-cycle criterion. Reliab. Engng. Syst. Safety, 2007, 92, 74–84.
29.
LipiT. F.LimJ. -H.ZuoM. J.Age replacement policy based on condition information. In Proceedings of 4th Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Advanced reliability and maintenance modeling (APARM 2010), Wellington, 2–4 December 2010, pp. 472–479.
