This study introduces a dynamical model to analyze and mitigate the Relative Age Effect (RAE) among male handball players in the French federation, from youth to professional levels. The RAE arises from age-based grouping, leading to psychological and behavioural (motor) differences among young athletes. Using system dynamics, the model simulates player movement and cumulative experience across cohorts, calibrated with data from the Fédération Française de Handball. The model incorporates a reinforcing feedback loop that amplifies initial advantages in size and weight, enhancing perceived skills and training opportunities. Various policy scenarios are explored to assess their impact on reducing the RAE. Results suggest that modifying cut-off dates could be the most effective strategy, potentially improving talent detection and reducing attrition in young cohorts. This research offers valuable insights for decision-makers aiming to address the RAE in handball and other team sports.
DuckworthALPetersonCMatthewsMDet al.Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. J Pers Soc Psychol2007; 92: 1087–1101.
2.
CobleySBakerJWattieNet al.Annual age-grouping and athlete development: a meta-analytical review of relative age effects in sport. Sports Med2009; 39: 235–256.
3.
HelsenWFVan WinckelJWilliamsAM. The relative age effect in youth soccer across Europe. J Sports Sci2005; 23: 629–636.
4.
BarnsleyRHThompsonAHBarnsleyPE. Hockey success and birthdate: the relative age effect. Can Assoc Health Phys Educ Recreat1985; 51: 23–28.
5.
DelormeNRaspaudM. The relative age effect in young French basketball players: a study on the whole population. Scand J Med Sci Sports2009; 19: 235–242.
6.
la RubiaADeBjørndalCTSánchez-MolinaJ, et al.The relationship between the relative age effect and performance among athletes in World Handball Championships. PLoS One2020; 15: e0230133.
7.
HancockDJAdlerALCôtéJ. A proposed theoretical model to explain relative age effects in sport. Eur J Sport Sci2013; 13: 630–637.
8.
WattieNSchorerJBakerJ. The relative age effect in sport: a developmental systems model. Sports Med2015; 45: 83–94.
9.
PiersonKAddonaVYatesP. A behavioural dynamic model of the relative age effect. J Sports Sci2014; 32: 776–784.
10.
ForresterJW. Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1961.
11.
HomerJBHirschGB. System dynamics modeling for public health: background and opportunities. Am J Public Health2006; 96: 452–458.
12.
FordA. Modeling the environment: an introduction to system dynamics modeling of environmental systems. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1999.
13.
StermanJD. Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Cambridge, MA: McGraw-Hill, 2000.
14.
MuschJGrondinS. Unequal competition as an impediment to personal development: a review of the relative age effect in sport. Dev Rev2001; 21: 147–167.
15.
BedardKDhueyE. The persistence of early childhood maturity: international evidence of long-run age effects. Q J Econ2006; 121: 1437–1472.
16.
WattieNCobleySBakerJ. Birth date and youth soccer player selection. Scand J Med Sci Sports2008; 18: 601–608.
17.
HancockDJAdlerALCôtéJ. Relative age effects in sport: a developmental systems model. Sports Med2013; 43: 777–789.
18.
YelleLE. The learning curve: historical review and comprehensive survey. Decis Sci1979; 10: 302–328.
19.
WrightTP. Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. J Aeronaut Sci1936; 3: 122–128.
DeJongJR. The effects of increasing skill on cycle time and its consequences for time standards. Ergonomics1957; 1: 51–60.
22.
GroupBC. Perspectives on experience. Boston, MA: Boston Consulting Group, 1968.
23.
TabatabaiMAWilliamsDKBursacZ. Hyperbolastic growth models: theory and application. Theor Biol Med Model2005; 2: 14
24.
TabatabaiMABursacZ. Hyperbolastic modeling of tumor growth with a new differential equation. Bull Math Biol2003; 65: 1057–1072.
25.
McFaddenD. Econometric analysis of qualitative response models. In: Handbook of econometrics. Vol. 2. Elsevier, 1984. pp.1395–1457.
26.
SoetaertKPetzoldtTSetzerRW. Solving differential equations in R: package deSolve and package FME. J Stat Softw2010; 33: 1–28.
27.
GrondinSDeshaiesPNaultLP. Trimestre de naissance et participation au hockey et au volleyball. Rev Québécoise Act Phys1984; 2: 97–103.
28.
BarakeAJMitchellHStavrosCet al.A game for the ages: understanding and overcoming the relative age effect in Australian football. Int J Sports Sci Coach2023; 18: 508–515.
29.
YamamotoDTakafujiJKatoTet al.The relative age and birth order effect in Japanese professional football. Int J Sports Sci Coach2022; 17: 1059–1070.
30.
CôtéJHancockDJ. Evidence-based policies for youth sport programmes. Int J Sport Policy Polit2016; 8: 51–65.
31.
INSEE. Bilan démographique 2023, 2023.
32.
MalinaRBouchardCBar-OrO. Growth, maturation, and physical activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2004.
33.
RogolADRoemmichJNClarkPA. Growth at puberty. J Adolesc Health2002; 31: 192–200.
34.
VaeyensRLenoirMWilliamsAMet al.Talent identification and development programmes in sport: current models and future directions. Sports Med2008; 38: 703–714.
35.
HillBSotiriadouP. Coach decision-making and the relative age effect on talent selection in football. Eur Sport Manag Q2016; 16: 292–315.
36.
AndronikosGElumaroAIWestburyTet al.Relative age effect: implications for effective practice. J Sports Sci2016; 34: 1124–1131.
37.
MalinaRMCummingSPRogolADet al.Bio-banding in youth sports: background, concept, and application. Sports Med2019; 49: 1671–1685.
38.
CummingSPLloydRSOliverJLet al.Bio-banding in sport: applications to competition, talent identification, and strength and conditioning of youth athletes. Strength Cond J2017; 39: 34–47.
39.
KellyALJacksonDTTaylorJJet al.“Birthday-banding” as a strategy to moderate the relative age effect: a case study into the England squash talent pathway. Front Sports Act Living2020; 2: 573890.
40.
RomannMRösslerRJavetMet al.Relative age effects in Swiss talent development – a nationwide analysis of all sports. J Sports Sci2018; 36: 2025–2031.
41.
UlbrichtAFernandez-FernandezJMendez-VillanuevaAet al.The relative age effect and physical fitness characteristics in German male tennis players. J Sports Sci Med2015; 14: 634.
42.
FaberIRMartinentGCeceVet al.Are performance trajectories associated with relative age in French top 100 youth table tennis players? – a longitudinal approach. PLoS One2020; 15: e0231926.
43.
HelsenWFStarkesJLVan WinckelJ. The influence of relative age on success and dropout in male soccer players. Am J Hum Biol Off J Hum Biol Assoc1998; 10: 791–798.
44.
LemezSBakerJHortonSet al.Examining the relationship between relative age, competition level, and dropout rates in male youth ice–hockey players. Scand J Med Sci Sports2014; 24: 935–942.
45.
HeinrichMRosenblattMWielandFGet al.On structural and practical identifiability: current status and update of results. Curr Opin Syst Biol2025; 41: 100546
