We introduced objective spatial-temporal metrics including centroid, stretch index, convex hull, and approximate entropy (ApEn) to analyse team behaviours during try-scoring events in rugby union. Data collected via 10 Hz global positioning system (GPS) technology during a competitive Super Rugby match were analysed across different field zones and phases of play. At the match level, there were no significant differences in team-level metrics between attack and defence. However, location specific analyses demonstrated higher defensive movement irregularity (higher ApEn) in the D22–40 (attack vs defence; 0.19 ± 0.02 vs 0.27 ± 0.02; mean ± SD) and D40–50 (0.24 ± 0.03 vs 0.30 ± 0.02), indicating field-location specific irregularity and defensive instability. Conversely, attacking sequences in the D22–40 (14.3 ± 1.1 m vs 13.0 ± 0.8 m) and D40–50 (14.1 ± 0.8 m vs 12.7 ± 0.2 m) displayed greater spatial expansion (higher stretch index) associated with creating scoring opportunities. These preliminary findings indicate that spatial-temporal metrics can capture context-dependent team behaviours in rugby union, offering promising tools for tactical analysis. Given the limited dataset, further research with larger samples is necessary to validate and refine these approaches for practical coaching applications.
DuarteMCostaVGomesJ, et al.Evolution of collective behaviors for a real swarm of aquatic surface robots. PloS One2016; 11: e0151834.
2.
SeifertLButtonCDavidsK. Key properties of expert movement systems in sport: an ecological dynamics perspective. Sports Med2013; 43: 167–178.
3.
SilvaPTravassosBVilarL, et al.Numerical relations and skill level constrain co-adaptive behaviors of agents in sports teams. PloS One2014; 9: e107112.
4.
GoesFRBrinkMSElferink-GemserMT, et al.The tactics of successful attacks in professional association football: large-scale spatiotemporal analysis of dynamic subgroups using position tracking data. J Sports Sci2021; 39: 523–532.
5.
GonçalvesBVFigueiraBEMaçãsV, et al.Effect of player position on movement behaviour, physical and physiological performances during an 11-a-side football game. J Sports Sci2014; 32: 191–199.
6.
KoudelaHSchaerfTMLathleanT, et al.Investigating the emergence of collective states within rugby sevens gameplay. J Sports Sci2024; 43: 1–12.
DuarteRAraújoDFolgadoH, et al.Capturing complex, non-linear team behaviours during competitive football performance. J Syst Sci Complex2013; 26: 62–72.
9.
SilvaPDuarteREstevesP, et al.Application of entropy measures to analysis of performance in team sports. Int J Perform Anal Sport2016; 16: 753–768.
10.
ColomerCMPyneDBMooneyM, et al.Performance analysis in rugby union: a critical systematic review. Sports Med-Open2020; 6: 1–15.
11.
HodderRWHopkinsWGBallKA, et al.Exploration of collective tactical variables in elite netball: an analysis of team and sub-group positioning behaviours. Plos One2024; 19: e0295787.
12.
CorsieMCraigTSwintonPA, et al.Spatial-temporal metrics to assess collective behavior in football: a systematic review and assessment of research quality and applicability. J Athl Enhanc2021; 10: 1–25.
13.
LowBCoutinhoDGonçalvesB, et al.A systematic review of collective tactical behaviours in football using positional data. Sports Med2020; 50: 343–385.
14.
MemmertDLemminkKAPMSampaioJ. Current approaches to tactical performance analyses in soccer using position data. Sports Med2017; 47: 1–10.
15.
CoughlanMMountifieldCSharpeS, et al.How they scored the tries: applying cluster analysis to identify playing patterns that lead to tries in super rugby. Int J Perform Anal Sport2019; 19: 435–451.
16.
McKayJDavidsKRobertsonS, et al.An ecological insight into the design and integration of attacking principles of play in professional rugby union: a case example. Int Sport Coach J2021; 8: 394–399.
17.
WheelerKWAskewCDSayersMG. Effective attacking strategies in rugby union. Eur J Sport Sci2010; 10: 237–242.
18.
FrenckenWPoelHDVisscherC, et al.Variability of inter-team distances associated with match events in elite-standard soccer. J Sports Sci2012; 30: 1207–1213.
19.
LowBReinRRaabeD, et al.The porous high-press? An experimental approach investigating tactical behaviours from two pressing strategies in football. J Sports Sci2021; 39: 2199–2210.
20.
González-RodenasJFerrandisJValdóJC, et al.Effects of different tactical formations on positional team behaviors during small sided games in youth soccer players. J Hum Kinet2024; 97: 237.
21.
BuenoMJOSilvaMCunhaSA, et al.Multiscale fractal dimension applied to tactical analysis in football: a novel approach to evaluate the shapes of team organization on the pitch. Plos One2021; 16: e0256771.
22.
AaronsMFYoungCMBruceL, et al.The effect of team formation on defensive performance in Australian football. J Sci Med Sport2022; 25: 178–182.
23.
HodderRWHopkinsWGBallKA, et al.Effects of collective tactical variables and predictors on the probability of scoring in elite netball. Int J Perform Anal Sport2023; 23: 264–283.
24.
CollinsNSawczukTWhiteheadS, et al.Close the gap: contextual influences on defensive dispersion in rugby league. Int J Perform Anal Sport2025: 1–13.
25.
LiuHHopkinsWGómezAM, et al.Inter-operator reliability of live football match statistics from OPTA sportsdata. Int J Perform Anal Sport2013; 13: 803–821.
26.
ScottGABezodisNWaldronM, et al.Performance indicators associated with match outcome within the united rugby championship. J Sci Med Sport2023; 26: 63–68.
27.
ClementeFMCouceiroMSMartinsFM, et al.Measuring tactical behaviour using technological metrics: case study of a football game. Int J Sports Sci Coach2013; 8: 723–739.
28.
FolgadoHLemminkKAFrenckenW, et al.Length, width and centroid distance as measures of teams tactical performance in youth football. Eur J Sport Sci2014; 14: S487–S492.
29.
GréhaigneJ-FGodboutP. Collective variables for analysing performance in team sportsRoutledge handbook of sports performance analysis. London, England: Routledge, 2013, pp.101–114.
30.
ClementeFMMartinsFMMendesRS, et al.Using collective metrics to inspect spatio-temporal relationships between football players. South Afr J Res Sport Phys Educ Recreat2014; 36: 47–59.
31.
ClementeFMOwenASerra-OlivaresJ, et al.The effects of large-sided soccer training games and pitch size manipulation on time–motion profile, spatial exploration and surface area: tactical opportunities. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part P J Sports Eng Technol2018; 232: 160–165.
32.
PincusSM. Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci1991; 88: 2297–2301.
33.
LowBBoasGVMeyerL, et al.Exploring the effects of deep-defending vs high-press on footballers’ tactical behaviour, physical and physiological performance: a pilot study. Mot Rev Educ Física2018; 24: e1018171.
34.
GlazierPSDavidsK. On analysing and interpreting variability in motor output. J Sci Med Sport2009; 12: e2–e3.
35.
GonçalvesBMarcelinoRTorres-RondaL, et al.Effects of emphasising opposition and cooperation on collective movement behaviour during football small-sided games. J Sports Sci2016; 34: 1346–1354.
36.
AlexanderJPSpencerBMara JocelynK, et al.Collective team behaviour of Australian rules football during phases of match play. J Sports Sci2019; 37: 237–243.
37.
NovakARRichardsonMJImpellizzeriFM, et al.Speed, spacing and synchrony: an exploratory, quantitative analysis of collective team behaviour in elite rugby union. J Sci Med Sport2022; 25: 17.
38.
MemmertDLemminkKASampaioJ. Current approaches to tactical performance analyses in soccer using position data. Sports Med2017; 47: 1–10.
