This study, from the perspective of empowerment theory, focuses on the power operation mechanism of coaches in the process of team management. It mainly analyzes the impact of organizational empowerment on coaches’ control of team, and further explores the influence mechanism after introducing two organizational variables—mentor-apprentice relationship and team climate—as well as the moderating effect of power distance as a dynamic variable.
Research Methods
A total of 1071 athletes from basketball, volleyball, and football in China were surveyed using a scale-based testing method, covering professional teams, youth teams, and high-level university teams. Regression analysis, factor analysis, and structural equation modeling were employed for data processing.
Research Findings
(1) Organizational empowerment directly and positively affects coaches’ control of team, and can also influence it through the mentor-apprentice relationship, team climate, or both simultaneously. In other words, the mentor-apprentice relationship and team climate not only function as independent mediators between organizational empowerment and coaches’ control of team but also jointly serve as chain mediators. (2) Power distance negatively moderates the dual-path mediating mechanism of organizational empowerment on coaches’ control of team. Specifically, it negatively moderates the effect of organizational empowerment on both the mentor-apprentice relationship and the team climate, with the moderating effect being more evident under conditions of low power distance.
ChenWLHanJZZhangMZ, et al.Skills development path and mechanism of disabled women from the perspective of empowerment theory: a case study of aide training school in Yixing City, Jiangsu province. Trop Geo2025; 45: 333–346.
2.
YuSYWangHL. The impact of Coaches’ qualifications on team leadership in China's “three Major balls": a moderated mediation model. J Beijing Sport Univ2025; 48: 28–41.
3.
JudgeTAPiccoloRF. Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. J Appl Psychol2004; 89: 755–768.
4.
LidenRCWayneSJZhaoH, et al.Servant leadership: development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. Leadership Quarter2008; 19: 161–177.
5.
PizzolittoEVernaIVendittiM. Authoritarian leadership styles and performance: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Manag Rev Q2023; 73: 841–871.
6.
SunZNYangKS. Research on the multiple labor forms, professional development dilemmas and directions of grassroots basketball coaches in China. J Beijing Sport Univ2025; 48: 76–85.
7.
ZhouJZhaoXC. People-oriented organizational empowerment: how social organizations empower beneficiaries - A case study of L foundation's “new strength excellent products program. Learn Pr2022; 01: 98–108.
8.
LeeAWillisSTianAW. Empowering leadership: a meta-analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation. J Organ Behav2018; 39: 306–325.
9.
TungHLChangYH. Effects of empowering leadership on performance in management team: mediating effects of knowledge sharing and team cohesion. J Chin Hum Resour Ma2011; 2: 43–60.
10.
SchermulyCCCreonLGerlachP, et al.Leadership styles and psychological empowerment: a meta-analysis. J Leadersh Org Stud2022; 29: 73–95.
11.
KuoHTYinTJCLiIC. Relationship between organizational empowerment and job satisfaction perceived by nursing assistants at long-term care facilities. J Clin Nurs2008; 17: 3059–3066.
12.
Bin AbdullahAGKAlmadhounTZLingYL. Organizational empowerment and commitment: the mediating effect of psychological empowerment. Asian J Soc S, Arts Humanite2015; 3: 1–7.
13.
HuJHXieD. Subjectivity deficiency and promoting paths of community emergency governance from the perspective of empowerment theory. Safety2024; 45: 61–67.
14.
JowettS. The coach-athlete partnership. Psychologist2005; 18: 412–415.
15.
ZimmermanMA. Empowerment theory: psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In: RappaportJSeidmanE (eds) Handbook of community psychology. 1th ed. Boston: Springer US, 2000, pp.43–63.
16.
ZhengXXHeYQDongHR, et al.Does leadership political skill suppress employees’ silence behavior?——the role of leadership trust and power distance. Psychol Sci2023; 46: 378–385.
17.
ThomasKWVelthouseBA. Cognitive elements of empowerment: an “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Acad Manage Rev1990; 15: 666–681.
18.
DeciELRyanRM. The” what” and” why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq2000; 11: 227–268.
19.
SpreitzerGM. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad Manage J1995; 38: 1442–1465.
20.
YammarinoFJDionneSDChunJU, et al.Leadership and levels of analysis: a state-of-the-science review. Leadership Quarte2005; 16: 879–919.
21.
SchneiderBEhrhartMGMaceyWH. Organizational climate and culture. Annu Rev Psychol2013; 64: 361–388.
22.
YuSYMengXYZhouP. Constructing the structural dimensions of coaching leadership behaviors in China's “three Major balls.”. J Beijing Sport Univ2024; 47: 1–18.
23.
KoeneBASVogelaarALWSoetersJL. Leadership effects on organizational climate and financial performance: local leadership effect in chain organizations. Leadership Quarter2002; 13: 193–215.
24.
FransenKDecroosSBroekG, et al.Leading from the top or leading from within? A comparison between coaches’and athletes’leadership as predictors of team identification, team confidence, and team cohesion. Int J Sports Sci Coa2016; 11: 757–771.
25.
JaelaniAKAgungAAGYudanaM, et al.The influence of participative leadership, organizational climate, organizational commitment to work productivity of vocational high school teachers in Mataram City. Int J Soc Sci Humanit2023; 7: 171–187.
26.
AhearneMMathieuJRappA. To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. J Appl Psychol2005; 90: 945–955.
27.
FreireGContreiraADe MoraesJ, et al.Coach-athlete relationship, team cohesion and motivation in Brazilian youth athletes: a cluster analysis. Hum Mov2023; 24: 5–7.
28.
DavisLApplebyRDavisP, et al.The role of coach-athlete relationship quality in team sport athletes’psychophysiological exhaustion: implications for physical and cognitive performance. J Sport Sci2018; 36: 1985–1992.
29.
HofstedeG. National cultures in four dimensions. Int Stud Manag Org1983; 13: 46–74.
30.
KirkmanBLLoweKBGibsonCB. A quarter century of culture's consequences: a review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework. J Int Busi Stud2006; 37: 285–320.
31.
BegleyTMLeeCFangY, et al.Power distance as a moderator of the relationship between justice and employee outcomes in a sample of Chinese employees. J Manage Psychol2002; 17: 692–711.
32.
VellaSAOadesLGCroweTP. The relationship between coach leadership, the coach–athlete relationship, team success, and the positive developmental experiences of adolescent soccer players. Phys Educ Sport Peda2013; 18: 549–561.
33.
Isoard-GautheurSTrouilloudDGustafssonH, et al.Associations between the perceived quality of the coach–athlete relationship and athlete burnout: an examination of the mediating role of achievement goals. Psychol Sport Exerc2016; 22: 210–217.
34.
PhillipsKIERANJowettSKrukowska-BurkeA, et al.The quality of the coach-athlete relationship predicts objective performance in elite cricket. Int J Sport Psychol2023; 54: 32–47.
35.
ChengBSChouLFWuTY, et al.Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian J Soc Psychol2004; 7: 89–117.
36.
ChanSCHuangXUSnapeED, et al.The Janus face of paternalistic leaders: authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinates’ organization-based self-esteem, and performance. J Organ Behav2013; 34: 108–128.
37.
FarhJLChengBSChouLF, et al.Authority and benevolence: employees’ responses to paternalistic leadership in China. In: BergerANClarkeT (eds) China's domestic private firms. 1th ed. New York: Routledge, 2014, pp.230–260.
38.
FanYFZhangXD. How does power distance belief affect consumer behavior: a review and prospect of research. Foreign Econ Manag2022; 44: 138–152.
39.
GouldDCollinsKLauerL, et al.Coaching life skills through football: a study of award winning high school coaches. J Appl Sport Psychol2007; 19: 16–37.
ZhouHLongLR. Statistical testing and control methods for common method bias. Adv Psych Sci2004; 12: 942–950.
42.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBPodsakoffNP. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu Rev Psychol2012; 63: 539–569.
43.
WangBJ.Multivariate analysis: statistical software and data analysis. 1st ed. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2007, 151–200.
44.
ArnoldJAAradSRhoadesJA, et al.The empowering leadership questionnaire: the construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. J Organ Behav2000; 21: 249–269.
45.
ZhangXBartolKM. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Acad Manage J2010; 53: 107–128.
BlauPM. Justice in social exchange. Sociol Inq1964; 34: 193–206.
48.
GraenGBUhl-BienM. Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarter1995; 6: 219–247.
49.
SaifNAliSHussainM, et al.Exploring the psychology of transformational leadership: pathways to citizenship in higher education. Futur Bus J2025; 11: 48.
50.
PaineJBOrganDW. The cultural matrix of organizational citizenship behavior: some preliminary conceptual and empirical observations. Hum Resour Manage R2000; 10: 45–59.
51.
KhatriN. Consequences of power distance orientation in organisations. Vision2009; 13: 1–9.
52.
GuoYZhuYZhangL. Inclusive leadership, leader identification and employee voice behavior: the moderating role of power distance. Curr Psychol2022; 41: 1301–1310.
53.
DavisLJowettSTafvelinS. Communication strategies: the fuel for quality coach-athlete relationships and athlete satisfaction. Front Psychol2019; 10: 2156.
54.
BrocknerJAckermanGGreenbergJ, et al.Culture and procedural justice: the influence of power distance on reactions to voice. J Exp Soc Psychol2001; 37: 300–315.
55.
MorrisonEWChenYRSalgadoSR. Cultural differences in newcomer feedback seeking: a comparison of the United States and Hong Kong. Appl Psychol2004; 53: 1–22.
