The presence of home advantage and referee bias in professional football has been widely documented. This study empirically examines the impact of Video Assistant Referee (VAR) technology on mitigating referee bias toward the home team by using a large-scale dataset spanning 41 football leagues across 26 countries from 2013 to 2024. Using a staggered difference-in-differences model and the synthetic control method, we provide causal evidence on how VAR influences home advantage measured by goals, red cards, and penalties. Our findings indicate that VAR adoption significantly reduces home advantage by increasing the average number of goals scored by away teams, rather than decreasing home team goals. Furthermore, an increase in direct red cards was observed, with a greater effect on home teams than away teams. However, there was no significant difference in the number of penalty kicks before and after the introduction of VAR. Additional analyses reveal that VAR implementation significantly increases the probability of away wins, reinforcing the main findings. These results demonstrate the role of technological innovation in enhancing fairness in professional football. By employing robust econometric techniques and a comprehensive dataset, this study contributes to the ongoing discourse on sports technology and referee decision-making, offering insights into the long-term effects of VAR implementation on competitive balance.
PhilippeFLVallerandRJAndrianarisoaJ, et al.Passion in referees: examining their affective and cognitive experiences in sport situations. J Sport Exerc Psychol2009; 31: 77–96.
2.
CuskellyGSmithCRynneJ. Predicting the retention of sports officials: the influence of stress, commitment and perceived organisational support. Eur Assoc Sport Manag2008.
3.
MascarenhasDRCollinsDMortimerP. Elite refereeing performance: developing a model for sport science support. Sport Psychol2005; 19: 364–379.
4.
BashiruSOpokuE. Referee bias and its impact on low fans attendance at stadiums: standpoints from Ghana. Int J Phys Educ Sports Health2017; 4: 139–147.
5.
KolbingerOLamesM. Scientific approaches to technological officiating aids in game sports. Curr Issues Sport Sci2017; 2: 1–10.
6.
AdubatoB. The promise of violence: televised, professional football games and domestic violence. J Sport Soc Issues2016; 40: 22–37.
7.
BuraimoBForrestDSimmonsR. The 12th man?: refereeing bias in English and German soccer. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc2010; 173: 431–449.
8.
BoykoRHBoykoARBoykoMG. Referee bias contributes to home advantage in English premiership football. J Sports Sci2007; 25: 1185–1194.
9.
CsatóL. When neither team wants to win: a flaw of recent UEFA qualification rules. Int J Sports Sci Coach2020; 15: 526–532.
10.
Devriesere K, Csató L, Goossens D. Tournament design: a review from an operational research perspective. Eur J Oper Res2025; 324: 1–21.
11.
KendallGLentenLJA. When sports rules go awry. Eur J Oper Res2017; 257: 377–394.
12.
CsatóL. A paradox of tournament seeding. Int J Sports Sci Coach2023; 18: 1277–1284.
13.
CsatóL. The fairness of the group draw for the FIFA world cup. Int J Sports Sci Coach2025; 20: 554–567.
14.
Lago-PeñasCReyEKalénA. How does video assistant referee (VAR) modify the game in elite soccer?Int J Perform Anal Sport2019; 19: 646–653.
15.
HanBChenQLago-PeñasC, et al.The influence of the video assistant referee on the Chinese super league. Int J Sports Sci Coach2020; 15: 662–668.
16.
GasparettoTLoktionovK. Does the video assistant referee (VAR) mitigate referee bias on professional football?PLoS One2023; 18: e0294507.
17.
AbbateCCrossJUhrigR. Video assistant referee and home field advantage: implications for referee bias. South Econ J2025; 91: 1176–1196.
18.
IşınAYiQ. Does video assistant referee technology change the magnitude and direction of home advantages and referee bias? A proof-of-concept study. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil2024; 16: 21.
19.
YildirimMBilmanME. New rules, new game? The effects of the away goals rule removal and video assistant referee adoption on game dynamics in UEFA champions league ties. J Policy Model2025; 47: 78–96.
20.
YildirimMBilmanME. Second-leg home advantage no more? The impact of video assistant referee and no away goals rule in elite soccer. J Policy Model2025; 47: 1097–1112.
21.
JohnstonR. On referee bias, crowd size, and home advantage in the English soccer premiership. J Sports Sci2008; 26: 563–568.
22.
PonzoMScoppaV. Does the home advantage depend on crowd support? Evidence from same-stadium derbies. J Sports Econ2018; 19: 562–582.
23.
NevillAPearsonAWebbT. No crowds, no home advantage in football during the COVID-19 season: are crowds able to manipulate all but the best referees’ behaviour?J Glob Sport Manag2024; 9: 527–544.
24.
SorsFGrassiMAgostiniT, et al.The sound of silence in association football: home advantage and referee bias decrease in matches played without spectators. Eur J Sport Sci2021; 21: 1597–1606.
25.
DawsonPDobsonSGoddardJ, et al.Are football referees really biased and inconsistent? Evidence on the incidence of disciplinary sanction in the English premier league. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc2007; 170: 231–250.
26.
CourneyaKSCarronAV. The home advantage in sport competitions: a literature review. J Sport Exerc Psychol1992; 14: 13–27.
27.
JonesMB. Differences in home advantage between sports. Psychol Sport Exerc2018; 34: 61–69.
28.
DohmenTJ. The influence of social forces: evidence from the behavior of football referees. Econ Inq2008; 46: 411–424.
29.
DawsonPDobsonS. The influence of social pressure and nationality on individual decisions: evidence from the behaviour of referees. J Econ Psychol2010; 31: 181–191.
30.
AlmeidaCHVolossovitchA. Home advantage in Portuguese football: effects of level of competition and mid-term trends. Int J Perform Anal Sport2017; 17: 244–255.
31.
AllenMSJonesMV. The home advantage over the first 20 seasons of the English premier league: effects of shirt colour, team ability and time trends. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol2014; 12: 10–18.
32.
ArmatasVYiannakosASeatonM, et al.Home advantage: comparison between professional and amateur Greek football leagues. J Sport Health Res2013; 5: 95–106.
33.
GoumasC. Home advantage and referee bias in European football. Eur J Sport Sci2014; 14: S243–S249.
34.
GoumasC. Home advantage in Australian soccer. J Sci Med Sport2014; 17: 119–123.
35.
PollardRArmatasV. Factors affecting home advantage in football world cup qualification. Int J Perform Anal Sport2017; 17: 121–135.
36.
RooneyLKennedyR. Home advantage in gaelic football: the effect of divisional status, season and team ability. Int J Perform Anal Sport2018; 18: 917–925.
37.
SeckinAPollardR. Home advantage in turkish professional soccer. Percept Mot Skills2008; 107: 51–54.
38.
NevillAMHolderRL. Home advantage in sport: an overview of studies on the advantage of playing at home. Sports Med1999; 28: 221–236.
39.
GaricanoLPalacios-HuertaIPrendergastC. Favoritism under social pressure. Rev Econ Stat2005; 87: 208–216.
40.
GreerDL. Spectator booing and the home advantage: a study of social influence in the basketball arena. Soc Psychol Q1983; 46: 252–261.
41.
InanT. The effect of crowd support on home-field advantage: evidence from European football. Ann Appl Sport Sci2020; 8: 0.
42.
ThirerJRampeyMS. Effects of abusive spectators’ behavior on performance of home and visiting intercollegiate basketball teams. Percept Mot Skills1979; 48: 1047–1053.
43.
NevillAMBalmerNJWilliamsAM. The influence of crowd noise and experience upon refereeing decisions in football. Psychol Sport Exerc2002; 3: 261–272.
LexHPizzeraAKurtesM, et al.Influence of players’ vocalisations on soccer referees’ decisions. Eur J Sport Sci2015; 15: 424–428.
46.
UnkelbachCMemmertD. Crowd noise as a cue in referee decisions contributes to the home advantage. J Sport Exerc Psychol2010; 32: 483–498.
47.
WunderlichFWeigeltMReinR, et al.How does spectator presence affect football? Home advantage remains in European top-class football matches played without spectators during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One2021; 16: e0248590.
48.
ScoppaV. Social pressure in the stadiums: do agents change behavior without crowd support?J Econ Psychol2021; 82: 102344.
49.
FischerKHaucapJ. Does crowd support drive the home advantage in professional football? Evidence from German ghost games during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Sports Econ2021; 22: 982–1008.
50.
EdensorT. Producing atmospheres at the match: fan cultures, commercialisation and mood management in English football. Emotion Space Soc2015; 15: 82–89.
51.
LeitnerMCDaumannFFollertF, et al.The cauldron has cooled down: a systematic literature review on home advantage in football during the COVID-19 pandemic from a socio-economic and psychological perspective. Manag Rev Q2023; 73: 605–633.
52.
WoratschekHHorbelCPoppB. The sport value framework–a new fundamental logic for analyses in sport management. Eur Sport Manag Q2014; 14: 6–24.
53.
NeaveNWolfsonS. Testosterone, territoriality, and the ‘home advantage’. Physiol Behav2003; 78: 269–275.
54.
Pettersson-LidbomPPriksM. Behavior under social pressure: empty Italian stadiums and referee bias. Econ Lett2010; 108: 212–214.
55.
BloßNSchorerJLoffingF, et al.Physical load and referees’ decision-making in sports games: a scoping review. J Sports Sci Med2020; 19: 149.
56.
WarnerSTingleJKKellettP. Officiating attrition: the experiences of former referees via a sport development lens. J Sport Manag2013; 27: 316–328.
57.
FolkessonPNybergCArcherT, et al.Soccer referees’ experience of threat and aggression: effects of age, experience, and life orientation on outcome of coping strategy. Aggress Behav2002; 28: 317–327.
58.
ClelandJCashmoreE. Football fans’ views of violence in British football: evidence of a sanitized and gentrified culture. J Sport Soc Issues2016; 40: 124–142.
Kaissidis-RodafinosAAnshelMHPorterA. Personal and situational factors that predict coping strategies for acute stress among basketball referees. J Sports Sci1997; 15: 427–436.
61.
LaneAMNevillAMAhmadNS, et al.Soccer referee decision-making: ‘shall I blow the whistle?’. J Sports Sci Med2006; 5: 243.
62.
WolfsonSWakelinDLewisM. Football supporters’ perceptions of their role in the home advantage. J Sports Sci2005; 23: 365–374.
63.
OudejansRRVerheijenRBakkerFC, et al.Errors in judging ‘offside’ in football. Nature2000; 404: 33.
64.
OudejansRRBakkerFCVerheijenR, et al.How position and motion of expert assistant referees in soccer relate to the quality or their offside judgements during actual match play. Int J Sport Psychol2005; 36: 3–21.
65.
HaseltonMGBussDM. Error management theory: a new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind Reading. J Pers Soc Psychol2000; 78: 81.
66.
HaseltonMGBussDM. Error management theory and the evolution of misbeliefs. Behav Brain Sci2009; 32: 522–523.
67.
BalmerNJNevillAMLaneAM, et al.Influence of crowd noise on soccer refereeing consistency in soccer. J Sport Behav2007; 30: 130.
68.
CollinsHEvansR. You cannot be serious! public understanding of technology with special reference to “hawk-eye”. Public Underst Sci2008; 17: 283–308.
69.
RyallE. Are there any good arguments against goal-line technology?Sport Ethics Philos2012; 6: 439–450.
70.
Singh BalBDurejaG. Hawk eye: a logical innovative technology use in sports for effective decision making. Sport Sci Rev2012; 21.
71.
StoneyEFletcherT. Are fans in the stands an afterthought?: sports events, decision-aid technologies, and the television match official in rugby union. Commun Sport2021; 9: 1008–1029.
72.
GürlerCPolatV. Video assistant referee's effect on football: turkish super league case. RBFF-Rev Bras Futsal Futeb2021; 13: 118–124.
73.
ZhangYLiDGómez-RuanoMA, et al.The effect of the video assistant referee (VAR) on referees’ decisions at FIFA women's world cups. Front Psychol2022; 13: 984367.
74.
Lago-PeñasCGómezMAPollardR. The effect of the video assistant referee on referee’s decisions in the spanish LaLiga. Int J Sports Sci Coach2021; 16: 824–829.
75.
HumphreysBRMarsellaAPerezL. The effect of monitoring and crowds on crime and law enforcement: a natural experiment from European football. Econ Fac Work Pap Ser2022: 67.
76.
ApostolouKTjortjisC. Sports analytics algorithms for performance prediction. In: 10th Int Conf Inf Intell Syst Appl 2019:1–4.
77.
PeetersT. Testing the wisdom of crowds in the field: transfermarkt valuations and international soccer results. Int J Forecast2018; 34: 17–29.
78.
SzymanskiS. Income inequality, competitive balance and the attractiveness of team sports: some evidence and a natural experiment from English soccer. Econ J2001; 111: 69–84.
79.
MichieJOughtonC. Competitive balance in football: Trends and effects. London: The sportsnexus, 2004 Jan 1.
80.
AlbaneseABaertSVerstraetenO. Twelve eyes see more than eight. Referee bias and the introduction of additional assistant referees in soccer. PLoS One2020; 15: e0227758.
81.
AlbertiGIaiaFMArcelliE, et al.Goal scoring patterns in major European soccer leagues. Sport Sci Health2013; 9: 151–153.
82.
Lago-PeñasCReyELago-BallesterosJ, et al.The influence of a congested calendar on physical performance in elite soccer. J Strength Cond Res2011; 25: 2111–2117.
83.
PeetersTvan OursJC. Seasonal home advantage in English professional football; 1974–2018. Economist (Leiden)2021; 169: 107–126.
84.
FaltingsRKrumerALechnerM. Rot-Jaune-Verde: on linguistic bias of referees in Swiss soccer. Kyklos2023; 76: 380–406.
85.
GalloEGrundTReadeJJ. Punishing the foreigner: implicit discrimination in the premier league based on oppositional identity. Oxf Bull Econ Stat2013; 75: 136–156.
86.
Varela-QuintanaCSánchezLCdel CorralJ. The effect of social pressure when judging favorites and underdogs. J Econ Behav Organ2025; 236: 107112.
ErrekagorriICastellanoJEcheazarraI, et al.The effects of the video assistant referee system (VAR) on the playing time, technical-tactical and physical performance in elite soccer. Int J Perform Anal Sport2020; 20: 808–817.
89.
OliveiraMADambrozFSantosR, et al.VAR Implementation and soccer team performance: a comparison between the 2014 and 2018 world cups. J Phys Educ Sport2021; 21: 3208–3213.
90.
KubayiALarkinPToriolaA. The impact of video assistant referee (VAR) on match performance variables at men’s FIFA world cup tournaments. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part P J Sports Eng Technol2022; 236: 187–191.
91.
HolderUEhrmannTKönigA. Monitoring experts: insights from the introduction of video assistant referee (VAR) in elite football. J Bus Econ2022; 92: 285–308.
92.
Ponce-BordónJCLobo-TriviñoDRubio-MoralesA, et al.The effect of the video assistant referee system implementation on match physical demands in the spanish LaLiga. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 5125.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
