Restricted accessCase reportFirst published online 2026-2
Exploring practitioner decision making in talent development environments: A multidisciplinary case study of an English Premier League football academy
Multidisciplinary working is perceived as best practice within elite football. However, our knowledge of decision-making as a collaborative team and the contextual realities experienced by multidisciplinary practitioners during decision-making processes requires scholarly attention. This study aimed to explore multidisciplinary decision-making and communication in an English Premier League (EPL) academy, adopting an interpretive case study approach. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews with 10 EPL practitioners who formed a multidisciplinary team. Data were analysed through a process of thematic analysis. Findings highlighted challenges surrounding the use and interpretation of data amongst multidisciplinary practitioners when making key decisions (i.e., to retain, loan or release academy players). We also found an increased appreciation of the contribution of player care staff within the multidisciplinary team, which was highly valued in the decision-making process. Finally, we highlighted the importance of developing trust and credibility within working relationships in multidisciplinary teams, and related challenges faced following an increase in remote and hybrid working. The findings have important implications for the development of multidisciplinary teams in elite sport and professional football academies, along with suggestions for future research to further our understanding of multidisciplinary working.
BurnsACollinsD. Interdisciplinary practice in performance sport: a scoping review of evidence and collaboration. Eur J Sport Sci2023; 23: 1877–1891. doi:10.1080/17461391.2023.2201812
2.
KellyS. The role of the professional football manager. London: Routledge, 2017.
3.
KellyA. Talent identification and development in youth soccer: a guide for researchers and practitioners. London: Routledge, 2024.
4.
LarsenCHAlfermannDHenriksenK, et al.Successful talent development in soccer: the characteristics of the environment. Sport Exerc Perform Psychol2013; 2: 190–206.
5.
ReillyTWilliamsAMNevillA, et al.A multidisciplinary approach to talent identification in soccer. J Sports Sci2000; 18: 695–702.
6.
KellyAWilsonMRJacksonDT, et al.A multidisciplinary investigation into “playing-up” in academy football according to age phase. J Sports Sci2021; 39: 854–864.
7.
RolloICarterJMCloseGL, et al.Role of sport psychology and sports nutrition in return to play from musculoskeletal injuries in professional soccer: an interdisciplinary approach. Eur J Sport Sci2021; 21: 1054–1063.
8.
PassJNelsonLDoncasterG. Real world complexities of periodization in a youth soccer academy: an explanatory sequential mixed methods approach. J Sports Sci2022; 40: 1290–1298.
9.
The Premier League. Elite player performance plan. London: The Premier League, 2011.
10.
DeanFKavanaghEWildingA, et al.An examination of the experiences of practitioners delivering psychology services within English Premier League soccer academies. Sports2022; 10: 1–16.
11.
MitchellTOGledhillAShandR, et al.Players’ perceptions of the talent development environment within the English Premier League and Football League. Int Sport Coach J2021; 8: 362–370.
12.
SpringhamMWalkerGStrudwickT, et al.Developing strength and conditioning coaches for professional football. Prof Strength Cond2018; 50: 9–16.
13.
CarvalhoHMGonçalvesCECollinsD, et al.Growth functional capacities and motivation for achievement and competitiveness in youth basketball: an interdisciplinary approach. J Sports Sci2018; 36: 742–748.
14.
DijkstraHPPollockNChakravertyR, et al.Managing the health of the elite athlete: a new integrated performance health management and coaching model. Br J Sports Med2014; 48: 523–531.
DowlingCReevesMJLittlewoodM, et al.Developing individuals whilst managing teams: perspectives of under 21 coaches within English Premier League football. Soccer Soc2018; 19: 1135–1150.
17.
AlfanoHCollinsD. Good practice delivery in sport science and medicine support: perceptions of experienced sport leaders and practitioners. Manag Sport Leisure2021; 26: 145–160.
18.
EkstrandJLundqvistDDavisonM, et al.Communication quality between the medical team and the head coach/manager is associated with injury burden and player availability in elite football clubs. Br J Sports Med2019; 53: 304–308.
19.
GibsonLGroomR. Understanding ‘vulnerability’ and ‘political skill’ in academy middle management during organisational change in professional youth football: towards an understanding of ‘actions, strategies and professional interests’. J Change Manag2021; 21: 358–382.
20.
ArnoldRCollingtonSManleyH, et al.“The team behind the team”: exploring the organizational stressor experiences of sport science and management staff in elite sport. J Appl Sport Psychol2019; 31: 7–26.
21.
TowlsonTCopeEPerryJL, et al.Practitioners’ multi-disciplinary perspectives of soccer talent according to phase of development and playing position. Int J Sports Sci Coach2019; 14: 528–540.
22.
ThomasG. How to do your case study. 2nd ed. London: Sage, 2016.
GibsonLGroomR. Case studies. In: NelsonLGroomRPotracP (eds) Research methods in sports coaching. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2024, pp.118–129.
25.
YinRK. Case study research and applications: design and methods. 6th ed. London: Sage Publications, 2018.
26.
BloomGAAlexander-UrquhartDFalcãoR. Individual and focus group interviews. In: NelsonLGroomRPotracP (eds) Research methods in sports coaching. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2024, pp.212–222.
27.
SparkesACSmithB. Qualitative research methods in sport, exercise and health. London: Routledge, 2014.
28.
PrendergastGGibsonL. A qualitative exploration of the use of player loans to supplement the talent development process of professional footballers in the under 23 age group of English football academies. J Sports Sci2022; 40: 422–430.
29.
BraunVClarkeV. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London: Sage Publications, 2013.
30.
CupplesBO'ConnorDCobleyS. Distinct trajectories of athlete development: a retrospective analysis of professional rugby league players. J Sports Sci2018; 36: 2558–2566.
31.
GibsonLGroomR. Ambiguity, manageability, and the orchestration of organisational change: a case study of an English Premier League Academy Manager. Sports Coach Rev2018a; 7: 23–44.
32.
GibsonLGroomR. Developing a professional leadership identity during periods of organisational change during professional youth football. Qual Res Sport Health Exerc2020; 12: 764–780.
33.
TracyS. Qualitative quality: eight ‘big tent’ criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq2010; 16: 837–851.
34.
SmithBMcGannonKR. Developing rigour in qualitative research: problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol2018; 11: 101–121.
35.
BraunVClarkeV. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health2019; 11: 589–597.
36.
GabbettTJNassisGPOetterE, et al.The athlete monitoring cycle: a practical guide to interpreting and applying training monitoring data. Br J Sports Med2017; 51: 1451–1452.
37.
MartindaleRNashC. Sport science relevance and application: perceptions of UK coaches. J Sports Sci2013; 31: 807–819.
38.
CollinsDMacNamaraÁMcCarthyN. Super champions, champions, and almost: important differences and commonalities on the rocky road. Front Psychol2016; 6: 1–11.
39.
McCarthyNCollinsD. Initial identification and selection bias versus the eventual confirmation of talent: evidence for the benefits of rocky road?J Sports Sci2014; 32: 1604–1610.
40.
GibsonLGroomR. The micropolitics of organisational change in professional youth football: towards an understanding of the ‘professional self’. Manag Sport Leisure2018b; 23: 106–122.
41.
GibsonLGroomR. The micropolitics of organisational change in professional youth football: towards an understanding of ‘actions, strategies and professional interests’. Int J Sports Sci Coach2019; 14: 3–14.
42.
WindtJMacDonaldKTaylorD, et al.“To tech or not to tech?”: a critical decision-making framework for implementing technology in sport. J Athl Train2020; 55: 902–910.
43.
ReidCStewartEThorneG. Multidisciplinary sport sciences teams in elite sport: comprehensive servicing or conflict and confusion?Sport Psychol2004; 18: 2014–2017.
44.
NelsonLJamesNNichollsS, et al.The importance of appearing trustworthy in the workplace: performance analysts’ perspectives. Sport Educ Soc2023; 30: 249–265. doi:10.1080/13573322.23.2288844
45.
StrudwickT. Working as a director of sports science or high-performance director. In: WilliamsAMFordPDrustB (eds) Science & soccer: developing elite performers. 4th ed. London: Routledge, 2023.
46.
CollinsDMacNamaraÁ. The rocky road to the top. Sports Med2012; 42: 907–914.
47.
MartinDO’DonoghuePGBradleyJ, et al.Developing a framework for professional practice in applied performance analysis. Int J of Performance Analysis in Sport2021; 21: 845–888.
48.
BrooksSKHallCEPatelD, et al.“In the office nine to five, five days a week… those days are gone”: qualitative exploration of diplomatic personnel’s experiences of remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Psychol2022; 10: 1–15.
