Biological maturation varies considerably among adolescent athletes and can significantly influence training, talent identification, and injury risk. However, it remains unclear to what extent professional football academies systematically assess and apply this information in practice.
Objectives
To investigate how professional Spanish football academies monitor biological maturation, what methods they use, and how this information is applied in training and sport-related decision-making, with comparisons between clubs from the top and second divisions.
Methods
A total of 36 out of 42 professional Spanish football academies participated in an online survey (17 from the top division and 19 from the second division). The questionnaire addressed whether and how biological maturation is assessed, what specific methods are used, and how the results are applied. Descriptive statistics and comparisons by division level were conducted.
Results
Only 47% of academies reported formally assessing biological maturation, although 64% indicated that they adapt training content based on developmental factors. Academies from the top division were more likely to perform assessments, use validated methods (e.g., maturity offset, Khamis–Roche), and integrate these data into training and player management decisions.
Conclusions
There is significant variability in how professional Spanish academies monitor and apply biological maturation. Academies from the top division tend to adopt more advanced and structured practices compared to those from the second division. To promote greater consistency and developmental fairness, standardized monitoring protocols and improved coach education are recommended within the professional football academy system in Spain.
BalliauwMBosmansJPauwelsD. Does the quality of a youth academy impact a football player’s market value?Sport Business Manag: An Int J2022; 12: 269–283.
2.
MurrDRaabeJHönerO. The prognostic value of physiological and physical characteristics in youth soccer: a systematic review. Eur J Sport Sci2018; 18: 62–74.
3.
ReillyTWilliamsAMNevillA, et al.A multidisciplinary approach to talent identification in soccer. J Sports Sci2000; 18: 695–702.
4.
JayanthiNSchleySCummingSP, et al.Developmental training model for the sport specialized youth athlete: a dynamic strategy for individualizing load-response during maturation. Sports Health2022; 14: 142–153.
5.
MalinaRMRogolADCummingSP, et al.Biological maturation of youth athletes: assessment and implications. Br J Sports Med2015; 49: 852–859.
6.
LloydRSOliverJLFaigenbaumAD, et al.Long-term athletic development, part 2: barriers to success and potential solutions. J Strength Cond Res2015; 29: 1451–1464.
7.
LloydRSOliverJL. The youth physical development model: a new approach to long-term athletic development. Strength Cond J2012; 34: 61–72.
8.
RommersNMostaertMGoossensL, et al.Age and maturity related differences in motor coordination among male elite youth soccer players. J Sports Sci2019; 37: 196–203.
9.
MoranJSandercockGRHRamírez-CampilloR, et al.A meta-analysis of maturation-related variation in adolescent boy athletes’ adaptations to short-term resistance training. J Sports Sci2017; 35: 1041–1051.
10.
RommersNRösslerRGoossensL, et al.Risk of acute and overuse injuries in youth elite soccer players: body size and growth matter. J Sci Med Sport2020; 23: 246–251.
11.
MaterneOChamariKFarooqA, et al.Injury incidence and burden in a youth elite football academy: a four-season prospective study of 551 players aged from under 9 to under 19 years. Br J Sports Med2021; 55: 493–500.
12.
JohnsonDMWilliamsSBradleyB, et al.Growing pains: maturity associated variation in injury risk in academy football. Eur J Sport Sci2020; 20: 544–552.
13.
ReadPJOliverJLDe Ste CroixMBA, et al.An audit of injuries in six English professional soccer academies. J Sports Sci2018; 36: 1542–1548.
14.
SalterJJulianRMentzelSV, et al.Maturity status influences perceived training load and neuromuscular performance during an academy soccer season. Res Sports Med2024; 32: 235–247.
15.
TowlsonCSalterJAdeJD, et al.Maturity-associated considerations for training load, injury risk, and physical performance in youth soccer: one size does not fit all. J Sport Health Sci2021; 10: 403–412.
16.
TowlsonCMacMasterCGonçalvesB, et al.The effect of bio-banding on physical and psychological indicators of talent identification in academy soccer players. Sci Med Football2021; 5: 280–292.
17.
HillMScottSMcGeeD, et al.Are relative age and biological ages associated with coaches’ evaluations of match performance in male academy soccer players?Int J Sports Sci Coach2021; 16: 227–235.
18.
CummingSPSearleCHemsleyJK, et al.Biological maturation, relative age and self-regulation in male professional academy soccer players: a test of the underdog hypothesis. Psychol Sport Exerc2018; 39: 147–153.
19.
SalterJDe Ste CroixMBAHughesJD, et al.Monitoring practices of training load and biological maturity in UK soccer academies. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2021; 16: 395–406.
20.
TeunissenJWRommersNPionJ, et al.Accuracy of maturity prediction equations in individual elite male football players. Ann Hum Biol2020; 47: 409–416.
21.
CummingSPLloydRSOliverJL, et al.Bio-banding in sport: applications to competition, talent identification, and strength and conditioning of youth athletes. Strength Cond J2017; 39: 34–47.
22.
ArenasLFrengerMSkorskiS, et al.Survey of the current practices of German football academies towards biological maturation assessment. Sci Med Football8. Epub ahead of print 2024. DOI: 10.1080/24733938.2023.2270563
23.
SalterJ. Training load dose-responses in adolescent male football: the importance of biological maturation. University of Gloucestershire. Epub ahead of print 14 July 2022. DOI: 10.46289/HH57H6J6
24.
Peñín-GrandesSMesonero-GarcíaSHuertas OlmedoF, et al.Unveiling pathways: exploring chronological and maturational biases in a Spanish professional soccer academy. Front Sports Act Living2025; 7: 1476448.
25.
MoranJRagaVCJonesB, et al.The identification and development of young talent in Spanish soccer academies: a 10-year multi-study follow-up. Int J Sports Sci Coach2024; 19: 1984–1994.
26.
Aixa-RequenaSGil-GalveALegaz-ArreseA, et al.Influence of biological maturation on the career trajectory of football players: does it predict elite success?J Function Morphol Kinesiol2025; 10: 153.
27.
García-RubioJGarcía-VallejoAArenas-ParejaMdlÁ, et al.From junior to elite in soccer: exploring the relative age effect and talent selection in Spanish youth national teams. Children2022; 9: 1543.
28.
Gutierrez Diaz Del CampoDPastor VicedoJCGonzalez VilloraS, et al.The relative age effect in youth soccer players from Spain. J Sports Sci Med2010; 9: 190–198.
29.
CummingSPi-RusiñolRRodasG, et al.The validity of automatic methods for estimating skeletal age in young athletes: a comparison of the BAUSport ultrasound system and BoneXpert with the radiographic method of Fels. Biol Sport2024; 41: 61–67.
30.
MalinaRMPeña ReyesMEFigueiredoAJ, et al.Skeletal age in youth soccer players: implication for age verification. Clin J Sport Med2010; 20: 469–474.
31.
MalinaRMChamorroMSerratosaL, et al.TW3 And fels skeletal ages in elite youth soccer players. Ann Hum Biol2007; 34: 265–272.
32.
MonasterioXGilSMBidaurrazaga-LetonaI, et al.Estimating maturity Status in elite youth soccer players: evaluation of methods. Med Sci Sports Exerc2024; 56: 1124–1133.
33.
World Medical Association. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA2013; 310: 2191–2194.
34.
CohenJ. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. Epub ahead of print 13 May 2013. DOI: 10.4324/9780203771587
35.
KhamisHJRocheAF. Predicting adult stature without using skeletal age: the Khamis-Roche method. Pediatrics1994; 94: 504–507.
36.
MirwaldRLBaxter-JonesADGBaileyDA, et al.An assessment of maturity from anthropometric measurements. Med Sci Sports Exerc2002; 34: 689–694.
37.
MooreSAMcKayHAMacdonaldH, et al.Enhancing a somatic maturity prediction model. Med Sci Sports Exerc2015; 47: 1755–1764.
38.
WhitehouseRHMarshallWATannerJM. Assessment of Skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW2 Method). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 1975.
39.
McBurnieADos’SantosTJohnsonD, et al.Training management of the elite adolescent soccer player throughout maturation. Sports2021; 9: 170.
40.
MalinaRMCoelho-e-SilvaMJMartinhoDV, et al.Observed and predicted ages at peak height velocity in soccer players. PLoS One2021; 16: e0254659.
41.
MalinaRMKoziełSM. Validation of maturity offset in a longitudinal sample of Polish girls. J Sports Sci2014; 32: 1374–1382.
42.
KoziełSMMalinaRM. Modified maturity offset prediction equations: validation in independent longitudinal samples of boys and girls. Sports Med2018; 48: 221–236.
43.
MalinaRMKoziełSM. Validation of maturity offset in a longitudinal sample of Polish boys. J Sports Sci2014; 32: 424–437.
44.
MalinaRMChohACCzerwinskiSA, et al.Validation of maturity offset in the Fels longitudinal study. Pediatr Exerc Sci2016; 28: 439–455.
45.
BurgessDJNaughtonGA. Talent development in adolescent team sports: a review. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2010; 5: 103–116.
46.
FigueiredoAJGonçalvesCECoelho e SilvaMJ, et al.Characteristics of youth soccer players who drop out, persist or move up. J Sports Sci2009; 27: 883–891.
47.
LovellRTowlsonCParkinG, et al.Soccer player characteristics in English lower-league development programmes: the relationships between relative age, maturation, anthropometry and physical fitness. PLoS One2015; 10: e0137238.
48.
BergeronMFMountjoyMArmstrongN, et al.International Olympic committee consensus statement on youth athletic development. Br J Sports Med2015; 49: 843–851.
49.
MeylanCCroninJOliverJ, et al.Talent identification in soccer: the role of maturity Status on physical, physiological and technical characteristics. Int J Sports Sci Coach2010; 5: 571–592.
50.
LloydRSOliverJLFaigenbaumAD, et al.Long-Term athletic development- part 1. J Strength Cond Res2015; 29: 1439–1450.
51.
SieghartsleitnerRZuberCZibungM, et al.Science or Coaches’ eye? - both! beneficial collaboration of multidimensional measurements and coach assessments for efficient talent selection in elite youth football. J Sports Sci Med2019; 18: 32–43.
52.
LeyhrDMurrDRomannM, et al.Assessing biological maturity timing by MRI and coaches’ eye in elite youth soccer players: a comparison between objective and subjective diagnostics utilizing correlation and single case analyses. Int J Sports Sci Coach2023; 18: 994–1002.
53.
FitzgeraldFCampbellMKearneyPE, et al.The eyes don’t have it: coaches’ eye is not a valid method of estimating biological maturation in male Gaelic football. Int J Sports Sci Coach2025; 20: 35–44.
54.
HillMScottSMcGeeD, et al.Coaches’ evaluations of match performance in academy soccer players in relation to the adolescent growth spurt. J Sci Sport Exer2020; 2: 359–366.
55.
BradleyBJohnsonDHillM, et al.Bio-banding in academy football: player’s perceptions of a maturity matched tournament. Ann Hum Biol2019; 46: 400–408.
56.
ShahidiSHÇetinerAGüneşF, et al.Maturation and bio-banding in youth soccer players: Insights from Turkish male academy across U-10 to U-15 age. Int J Strength Condition4. Epub ahead of print 16 February 2024. DOI: 10.47206/ijsc.v4i1.302
57.
TowlsonCCobleySMidgleyA, et al.Relative age, maturation and physical biases on position allocation in elite-youth soccer. Int J Sports Med2017; 38: 201–209.
58.
LüdinDDonathLCobleyS, et al.Effect of bio-banding on physiological and technical-tactical key performance indicators in youth elite soccer. Eur J Sport Sci2022; 22: 1659–1667.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
