This study aimed to develop and validate a test (DTK-T) to assess the Declarative Tactical Knowledge (DTK) in young volleyball players. Accordingly, 222 players (mean age 14.37 ± 1.37) and 20 coaches were sampled. The players were classified into beginners and experts based on their years of training. The DTK-T was developed and validated through forward-backward translation, pilot testing, item analysis, content and construct validity, and reliability analysis. A Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve was built to establish which DTK-T score better identified more trained players. Construct validity analysis demonstrated a moderate test's ability to discriminate differences between beginners and experts. According to ROC analysis, 15 (on a maximum of 24) was identified as the score that better discriminates between groups (AUC = 0.78; accuracy = 0.74; sensitivity = 0.92; specificity = 0.50). The reliability of DTK-T over time was also verified (ICC = 0.80, 95%CI = [0.54,0.92]). These results indicate that the DTK-T possesses properties suitable for measuring DTK in young volleyball players.
AbbottACollinsD. Eliminating the dichotomy between theory and practice in talent identification and development: considering the role of psychology. J Sports Sci2004; 22: 395–408.
2.
LidorRCôtéJHackfortD. ISSP Position stand: to test or not to test? The use of physical skill tests in talent detection and in early phases of sport development. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol2009; 7: 131–146.
3.
SgròFQuintoALipomaM, et al.A multidimensional approach to talent identification in youth volleyball through declarative tactical knowledge and functional fitness. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol2024; 9: 29–42.
4.
Conejero SuárezMPrado SereniniALFernández-EcheverríaC, et al.The effect of decision training, from a cognitive perspective, on decision-making in volleyball: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 3628.
5.
Sánchez-LópezREcheazarraICastellanoJ. Systematic review of declarative tactical knowledge evaluation tools based on game-play scenarios in soccer. Qual Quant2022; 56: 2157–2176.
6.
NicolosiSQuintoALipomaM, et al. Situational analysis and tactical decision-making in elite handball players. Appl Sci2023; 13: 8920.
7.
HodgesNJStarkesJLMacMahonC. Expert performance in sport: a cognitive perspective. In: EricssonKACharnessNFeltovichPJ, et al. (eds) The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp.471–488.
8.
PinderRADavidsKRenshawI, et al.Representative learning design and functionality of research and practice in sport. J Sport Exerc Psychol2011; 33: 146–155.
9.
DimundoFColeMBlagroveRC, et al.Talent identification in an English Premiership Rugby Union academy: multidisciplinary characteristics of selected and non-selected male under-15 players. Front Sports Act Living2021; 3: 688143.
10.
DavidsKAraújoDHristovskiR, et al.Ecological dynamics and motor learning design in sport. In: HodgesNJWilliamsAM (eds) Skill acquisition in sport: research, theory and practice skill acquisition in sport: research, theory and practice. 1st ed.London: Routledge, 2012, pp.112–130.
11.
BarcaMQuintoAMVSgròF. Assessing declarative tactical knowledge in physical education: theoretical model and practical perspectives. In: Gil-MadronaP (ed) Advances in early childhood and K-12 education. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2022, pp.277–293.
12.
MorenoMPMorenoAGarcía-GonzálezL, et al.An intervention based on video feedback and questioning to improve tactical knowledge in expert female volleyball players. Percept Mot Skills2016; 122: 911–932.
13.
AndersonJR. Skill acquisition: compilation of weak-method problem situations. Psychol Rev1987; 94: 192–210.
14.
SieglerRS. Children’s thinking: what develops?1st ed.New York: Psychology Press, 1978.
15.
AbernethyBThomasJRThomasKT. Strategies for improving understanding of motor expertise. In: StarkesJLAllardF (eds) Cognitive issues in motor expertise. 1st ed.Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1993, pp.317–356.
16.
CostaGDCTCastroHDOCabralFDA, et al.Validação de conteúdo das cenas do teste de conhecimento tático declarativo no voleibol – TCTD:vb. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum2016; 18: 629–637.
17.
De VillarFIglesiasD. Evaluación de la táctica deportiva. Report, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Spain, 2007.
18.
ThomasKTThomasJR. Developing expertise in sport: the relation of knowledge and performance. Int J Sport Psychol1994; 25: 295–315.
19.
SchmidtRAWrisbergCA. Motor learning and performance: a situation-based learning approach. 4th ed.Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2008, p.395.
20.
BarracloughSTillKKerrA, et al.Methodological approaches to talent identification in team sports: a narrative review. Sports2022; 10: 81.
21.
Sport for Life. Long-term development in sport and physical activity 3.0. Victoria: Sport for Life, 2019.
22.
HodgesNJWilliamsAM. Skill acquisition in sport: research, theory and practice. 3rd ed.New York: Routledge, 2019.
23.
McGeeRFarrowA. Test questions for physical education activities. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1987, p.432.
24.
SafritMJWoodTM. Introduction to measurement in physical education and exercise science. 3rd ed.St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 1995.
25.
PritchardTHawkinsAWiegandR, et al.Effects of two instructional approaches on skill development, knowledge, and game performance. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci2008; 12: 219–236.
26.
MorenoAMorenoMPGarcía-GonzálezL, et al.The development and validation of the declarative knowledge questionnaire in volleyball. Eur J Hum Mov2010; 25: 183–195.
27.
ConejeroMSereniniALPJiménezR, et al.Diseño y validación de un cuestionario de conocimiento táctico en voleibol, en Brasil. Rev Psychol Deporte2021; 30: 51–61.
28.
De Oliveira CastroHPraçaGMMesquitaIM, et al.The impact of pendular model on decision-making and tactical-technical performance of U18 male volleyball players. Int J Sports Sci Coach2022; 17: 792–803.
29.
CostaGCCastroHOMesquitaIR, et al.Tactical knowledge, decision-making, and brain activation among volleyball coaches of varied experience. Percept Mot Skills2018; 125: 951–965.
30.
SilvaWJBRibasSMizoguchiVM, et al.Objective and subjective assessment of declarative tactical knowledge among young female basketball athletes throughout a season. J Phys Educ Sport2023; 23: 1501–1508.
31.
DomínguezAMArroyoMPMGallegoDI, et al.Estudio del conocimiento declarativo en función de la experiencia y de la edad en jugadores jóvenes de voleibol. Cult Cienc Deporte2006; 2: 73–80.
32.
TsangSRoyseCTerkawiA. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth2017; 11: 70–89.
33.
Di NuovoS. Misurare la mente: i test cognitivi e di personalità. 1st ed.Roma: Ed. Laterza, 2008, p.181.
34.
Hernandez-NietoR. Contributions to statistical analysis: the coefficients of proportional variance, content validity and Kappa. 1st ed.Mérida: BookSurge Publishing, 2002.
35.
Cassepp-BorgesVBalbinottiMAATeodoroMLM. Tradução e validação de conteúdo: uma proposta para adaptação de instrumentos. In: PasqualiL (ed) Instrumentação psicológica Fundamentos e práticas. 1st ed.Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2010. pp.506–520.
36.
Juarez-HernandezLGTobonS. Análisis de los elementos implícitos en la validación de contenido de un instrumento de investigación. Revista Espacios2018; 39: 23–30.
37.
MoralesJGrecoPAndradeR. Content validity of the instrument for assessment of tactical procedural knowledge in basketball. Cuad Psicol Deporte2012; 12: 31–36.
38.
SartoriRPasiniM. Indicatori e costrutti in psicometria: validità dei test. DiPAV2007; 20: 25–40.
39.
MachadoGDa CostaIT. TacticUP video test for soccer: development and validation. Front Psychol2020; 11: 1690.
RocaAWilliamsAMFordPR. Developmental activities and the acquisition of superior anticipation and decision making in soccer players. J Sports Sci2012; 30: 1643–1652.
42.
IssurinVB. Evidence-based prerequisites and precursors of athletic talent: a review. Sports Med2017; 47: 1993–2010.
43.
TabachnickBGFidellLSUllmanJB. Using multivariate statistics. 7th ed.New York: Pearson, 2019, p.832.
44.
RuizJROrtegaFBRizzoNS, et al.High cardiovascular fitness is associated with low metabolic risk score in children: the European Youth Heart Study. Pediatr Res2007; 61: 350–355.
LandisJRKochGG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics1977; 33: 159–174.
47.
SireciSG. The construct of content validity. Soc Indic Res1998; 45: 83–117.
48.
ThorndikeRMThorndike-ChristT. Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education. 8th ed.Boston: Prentice Hall, 2010.
49.
Elferink-GemserMTKannekensRLyonsJ, et al.Knowing what to do and doing it: differences in self-assessed tactical skills of regional, sub-elite, and elite youth field hockey players. J Sports Sci2010; 28: 521–528.
50.
NielsenTMMcPhersonSL. Response selection and execution skills of professionals and novices during singles tennis competition. Percept Mot Skills2001; 93: 541–555.
51.
MacMahonCMcPhersonSL. Knowledge base as a mechanism for perceptual-cognitive tasks: skill is in the details!. Int J Sport Psychol2009; 40: 565–579.
52.
WilliamsAMWardP. Anticipation and decision making: exploring new horizons. In: TenenbaumGEklundRC (eds) Handbook of sport psychology. 1st ed.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2007, pp.203–223.
53.
WilliamsAMWardPKnowlesJM, et al.Anticipation skill in a real-world task: measurement, training, and transfer in tennis. J Exp Psychol Appl2002; 8: 259–270.
54.
AllardFStarkesJL. Perception in sport: volleyball. J Sport Psychol1980; 2: 22–33.
55.
KolmanNSHuijgenBCHVan HeuvelenMJG, et al.Self-assessed tactical skills in tennis players: psychometric evaluation of the tactical skills questionnaire in tennis. Front Sports Act Living2022; 4: 988596.
56.
BalyiIWayRHiggsC. Long-term athlete development. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2013, p.286.
57.
VossMWKramerAFBasakC, et al.Are expert athletes ‘expert’ in the cognitive laboratory? A meta-analytic review of cognition and sport expertise. Appl Cogn Psychol2010; 24: 812–826.
