Aim: This study aimed to establish reference values for assessing physical fitness (PF) and motor competence (MC) in children aged 6 to 11 years, determine the prevalence of physically gifted and talented children and to explore the association between PF and MC as indicators of talent. Methods: 1108 Spanish schoolchildren aged 6 to 11 years (mean age = 8.45 ± 1.70 years old; 51% boys) participated in this study. The PF tests included the 20 m SRT (CRF), 25 m sprint (speed), handgrip strength and SLJ tests (muscular strength), while MC was assessed using the SDT. To identify prevalence, two criteria from the Gagné model were used: physical talent (≥95th percentile in one or more tests) and physical giftedness (≥75th percentile in all tests). Results: Boys demonstrated better performance compared to girls across all age groups: speed (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.977), handgrip strength (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.383), SLJ (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.992) and CRF (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 1.299). In the SDT, differences were observed between age groups (p < 0.001) but not between sexes. Likewise, boys showed a higher prevalence of talent (19% vs. 15%; p < 0.001) and physical giftedness (10% vs. 5%; p < 0.001) compared to girls. Additionally, different associations were found between PF and MC (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Boys showed a higher prevalence of being categorized as talented or physically gifted than girls. Furthermore, differences in PF and MC are influenced by sex and age, with boys showing a better performance in PF.
StoddenDGoodwayJLangendorferS, et al.A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: an emergent relationship. Quest2008; 60: 290–306.
4.
CattuzzoMdos Santos HenriqueRNicolai RéA, et al.Motor competence and health related physical fitness in youth: a systematic review. J Sci Med Sport2016; 19: 123–129.
5.
Castro-PiñeroJPadilla-MoledoCOrtegaF, et al.Cardiorespiratory fitness and fatness are associated with health complaints and health risk behaviors in youth. J Phys Act Health2012; 9: 642–649.
6.
Latorre-RománPMoreno del CastilloRLucena ZuritaM, et al.Physical fitness in preschool children: association with sex, age and weight status. Child Care Health Dev2017; 43: 267–273.
7.
BurtonACowburnIThompsonF, et al.Associations between motor competence and physical activity, physical fitness and psychosocial characteristics in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med2023; 53: 2191–2256.
8.
VandoniMMarinLCavalloC, et al.Poor motor competence affects functional capacities and healthcare in children and adolescents with obesity. Sports2024; 12: 44.
9.
Steene-JohannessenJHansenBHDaleneKE, et al.Variations in accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time across Europe–harmonized analyses of 47,497 children and adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2020; 17: 1–14.
10.
SchlagEFerrariNKochB, et al.Secular trends in motor performance of children and adolescents between 2010 and 2020. Transl Sport Med2021; 4: 882–891.
11.
TesterGAcklandTHoughtonL. A 30-year journey of monitoring fitness and skill outcomes in physical education: lessons learned and a focus on the future. Adv Phys Educ2014; 04: 127–137.
12.
VaeyensRLenoirMWilliamsA, et al.Talent identification and development programmes in sport: current models and future directions. Sports Med2008; 38: 703–714.
13.
den UilAJanssenMBuschV, et al.The relationships between children’s motor competence, physical activity, perceived motor competence, physical fitness and weight status in relation to age. PLoS One2023; 18: e0278438.
14.
KuboJTamakiKArikawaH. Effects of practice frequency on the physical fitness profile of talent identification in fourth graders practicing soccer and swimming. J Phys Educ Sport2022; 22: 1792–1798.
15.
Van HoorenBDe Ste CroixM. Sensitive periods to train general motor abilities in children and adolescents: do they exist? A critical appraisal. Strength Cond J2020; 42: 7–14.
16.
VandorpeBVandendriesscheJVaeyensR, et al.The value of a non-sport-specific motor test battery in predicting performance in young female gymnasts. J Sports Sci2012; 30: 497–505.
17.
PankhurstACollinsD. Talent identification and development: the need for coherence between research, system, and process. Quest2013; 65: 83–97.
18.
OrtegaFLeskošekBBlagusR, et al.European fitness landscape for children and adolescents: updated reference values, fitness maps and country rankings based on nearly 8 million test results from 34 countries gathered by the FitBack network. Br J Sports Med2023; 57: 299–310.
19.
TomkinsonGCarverKAtkinsonF, et al.European normative values for physical fitness in children and adolescents aged 9-17 years: results from 2 779 165 Eurofit performances representing 30 countries. Br J Sports Med2018; 52: 1445–1456.
20.
Gulías-GonzálezRSánchez-LópezMOlivas-BravoÁ, et al.Physical fitness in Spanish schoolchildren aged 6-12 years: reference values of the battery EUROFIT and associated cardiovascular risk. J Sch Health2014; 84: 625–635.
21.
DrenowatzCGreierKHinterkörnerF, et al.Relative age effect in physical fitness during the elementary school years. Pediatr Rep2021; 13: 322–333.
22.
TillKBakerJ. Challenges and [possible] solutions to optimizing talent identification and development in sport. Front Psychol2020; 11: 525518.
23.
SpiesFSchauerLBindelT, et al.Talent detection—importance of the will and the ability when starting a sport activity | Talententdeckung – Bedeutung des Wollens und des Könnens bei Beginn einer sportlichen Aktivität. Ger J Exerc Sport Res2022; 52: 647–656.
24.
SedeaudADifernandADe LarochelambertQ, et al.Talent identification: time to move forward on estimation of potentials? Proposed explanations and promising methods. Sports Med2025; 55: 1–18.
25.
FaberIKoopmannTBüschD, et al.Developing a tool to assess technical skills in talented youth table tennis players—a multi-method approach combining professional and scientific literature and coaches’ perspectives. Sport Med - Open2021; 7: 42.
26.
MyburghGKCummingSPCoelhoE, , et al.Growth and maturity status of elite British junior tennis players. J Sports Sci2016; 34: 1957–1964.
27.
RamosSVolossovitchAFerreiraAP, et al.Differences in maturity, morphological and physical attributes between players selected to the primary and secondary teams of a Portuguese Basketball elite academy. J Sports Sci2019; 37: 1681–1689.
28.
TannerJWhitehouseRTakaishiM. Standards from birth to maturity for height, weight, height velocity, and weight velocity: British children, 1965. I. Arch Dis Child1966; 41: 454–471.
29.
KingMBrownMCoxJ, et al.Talent identification in soccer: the influence of technical, physical and maturity-related characteristics on a national selection process. PLoS One2024; 19: e0298359.
30.
López-SanzGPrieto-AyusoA. Consistency between two tests of assessment of motor talent in physical education. Rev Investig Educ2024; 42: 241–255.
31.
BaileyRMorleyD. Towards a model of talent development in physical education. Sport Educ Soc2006; 11: 211–230.
32.
PortellaDVidal-EspinozaRSulla-TorresJ, et al.Reference values for body composition and physical fitness of young Brazilian elite soccer players. Front Physiol2023; 14: 1285952.
33.
RibeiroAdSWerneckFFigueiredoA, et al.Talent identification and development in judo: a perspective from Brazilian coaches. Int J Sport Sci Coach2023; 18: 38–45.
34.
HoboldEPires-LopesVGómez-CamposR, et al.Reference standards to assess physical fitness of children and adolescents of Brazil: an approach to the students of the Lake Itaipú region-Brazil. PeerJ2017; 5: e4032.
35.
BarracloughATillKKerrA, et al.Methodological approaches to talent identification in team sports: a narrative review. Sports2022; 10: 81.
36.
WrangCMMartinLJRossingNN, et al.How do young athletes experience selection and nonselection? An ethnographic study of talent categorization and identification processes. Sport Exerc Perform Psychol2023; 12: 155–171.
37.
JohnstonKWattieNSchorerJ, et al.Talent identification in sport: a systematic review. Sport Med2018; 48: 97–109.
38.
JonesBWeavingDTeeJ, et al.Bigger, stronger, faster, fitter: the differences in physical qualities of school and academy rugby union players. J Sports Sci2018; 36: 2399–2404.
39.
GagnéF. Building gifts into talents: detailed overview of the DMGT 2.0. In: VanTassel-BaskaJMacFarlaneB (eds) Leading change in gifted education: The festschrift of Dr Joyce VanTassel-Baska. Waco (TX), USA:Prufrock Press, 2009, pp.61–80.
40.
WilliamsAReillyT. Talent identification and development in soccer. J Sports Sci2000; 18: 657–667.
41.
CastellóABattleC. Theoretical and instrumental aspects in the identification of gifted and talented students. Proposal for a protocol. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 1998, pp. 26–66.
42.
ZhaoJXiangCKamaldenT, et al.Differences and relationships between talent detection, identification, development and selection in sport: a systematic review. Heliyon2024; 10: e27543.
43.
RasmussenAWohlfahrt-VejeCDe Renzy-MartinK, et al.Validity of self-assessment of pubertal maturation. Pediatrics2015; 135: 86–93.
44.
LégerLAMercierDGadouryC, et al.The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci1988; 6: 93–101.
45.
Andrade-LaraKde la Casa PérezACubero PachecoA, et al.Factors influencing gait performance: comfortable linear gait and complex gait in school-aged children in a dual-task model. J Mot Behav2024; 57: 118–133.
46.
RuizJEspaña-RomeroVOrtegaF, et al.Hand span influences optimal grip span in male and female teenagers. J Hand Surg Am2006; 31: 1367–1372.
47.
España-RomeroVArteroEGJimenez-PavónD, et al.Assessing health-related fitness tests in the school setting: reliability, feasibility and safety; the ALPHA study. Int J Sports Med2010; 31: 490–497.
48.
StöckelTWeigeltMKrugJ. Acquisition of a complex basketball-dribbling task in school children as a function of bilateral practice order. Res Q Exerc Sport2011; 82: 188–197.
49.
CohenJ. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2013, pp. 13–17.
50.
HopkinsWMarshallSBatterhamA, et al.Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc2009; 41: 3–13.
51.
GolleKMuehlbauerTWickD, et al.Physical fitness percentiles of German children aged 9–12 years: findings from a longitudinal study. PLoS One2015; 10: e0142393.
52.
Iglesias-SolerERúa-AlonsoMRial-VázquezJ, et al.Percentiles and principal component analysis of physical fitness from a big sample of children and adolescents aged 6–18 years: the DAFIS project. Front Psychol2021; 12: 627834.
53.
SaukaMPriediteIArtjuhovaL, et al.Physical fitness in northern European youth: reference values from the Latvian Physical Health in Youth Study. Scand J Public Health2011; 39: 35–43.
54.
MartaCMarinhoDBarbosaT, et al.Physical fitness differences between prepubescent boys and girls. J Strength Cond Res2012; 26: 1756–1766.
55.
Manzano-CarrascoSGarcia-UnanueJLopez-FernandezJ, et al.Differences in body composition and physical fitness parameters among prepubertal and pubertal children engaged in extracurricular sports: the active health study. Eur J Public Health2022; 32: I67–I72.
56.
CarayanniVBogdanisGVlachopapadopoulouE, et al.Predicting VO2 max in children and adolescents aged between 6 and 17 using physiological characteristics and participation in sport activities: a cross-sectional study comparing different regression models stratified by gender. Children2022; 9: 1935.
57.
MasanovicBGardasevicJMarquesA, et al.Trends in physical fitness among school-aged children and adolescents: a systematic review. Front Pediatr2020; 8: 627529.
58.
GomezGBurrEDiBelloA, et al.Understanding sex differences in physical activity behavior: the role of anxiety sensitivity. Ment Health Phys Act2021; 20: 100392.
59.
ArmstrongSWongCPerrinE, et al.Association of physical activity with income, race/ethnicity, and sex among adolescents and young adults in the United States: findings from the national health and nutrition examination survey, 2007–2016. JAMA Pediatr2018; 172: 732–740.
60.
KocićJStojanovićDStankovićS, et al.Muscle strength test performance changes over time in Serbian children. Acta Medica Median2019; 58: 154–160.
61.
Ben MansourGKacemAIshakM, et al.The effect of body composition on strength and power in male and female students. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil2021; 13: 150.
62.
ButterfieldSAngellRMasonC. Age and sex differences in object control skills by children ages 5 to 14. Percept Mot Skills2012; 114: 261–274.
63.
BolgerLBolgerLO’ NeillC, et al.Age and sex differences in fundamental movement skills among a cohort of Irish school children. J Mot Learn Dev2018; 6: 81–100.
64.
NakataHAkidoMNaruseK, et al.Relative age effect in physical fitness among elementary and junior high school students. Percept Mot Skills2017; 124: 900–911.
65.
BirchSCummingsLOxfordS, et al.Examining relative age effects in fundamental skill proficiency in British children aged 6–11 years. J Strength Cond Res2016; 30: 2809–2815.
66.
SandercockGGRHTaylorMJMVossC, et al.Quantification of the relative age effect in three indices of physical performance. J Strength Cond Res2013; 27: 3293–3299.
67.
HelsenWFBakerJMichielsS, et al.The relative age effect in European professional soccer: did ten years of research make any difference?J Sports Sci2012; 30: 1665–1671.
68.
BakerJSchorerJWattieN. Compromising talent: issues in identifying and selecting talent in sport. Quest2018; 70: 48–63.
69.
RongenFMcKennaJCobleyS, et al.Are youth sport talent identification and development systems necessary and healthy?Sport Med - Open2018; 4: 1–4.
70.
Cuba-DoradoAVleckVÁlvarez-YatesT, et al.Gender effect on the relationship between talent identification tests and later world triathlon series performance. Sports2021; 9: 164.
71.
MehusIMartindaleRJJAndronikosG, et al.Comparing talent development environments of girls and boys in handball and ice hockey in Norway. Eur J Sport Sci2025; 25: e12225.
72.
LyonsMConlonJNimphiusS, et al.An athlete’s perspective: comparing talent development environments for boys and girls in Western Australia youth soccer. Int J Sport Sci Coach2024; 19: 1995–2005.
73.
CurranOMacNamaraAPassmoreD. What about the girls? Exploring the gender data gap in talent development. Front Sport Act Living2019; 1: 472126.
74.
KretschmerLSalaliGAndersenL, et al.Gender differences in the distribution of children’s physical activity: evidence from nine countries. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2023; 20: 1–10.
75.
BarnettLVan BeurdenEMorganP, et al.Gender differences in motor skill proficiency from childhood to adolescence: a longitudinal study. Res Q Exerc Sport2010; 81: 162–170.
76.
MaiaJSantosCPereiraS, et al.A multivariate multilevel approach to unravel the associations between individual and school factors on children’s motor performance in the REACT project. Am J Hum Biol2024; 36: 1–18.
77.
HagaM. The relationship between physical fitness and motor competence in children. Child Care Health Dev2008; 34: 329–334.
78.
LubansDMorganPCliffD, et al.Fundamental movement skills in children and adolescents: review of associated health benefits. Sports Med2010; 40: 1019–1035.
79.
BatezMMiloševićŽMikulićI, et al.Relationship between motor competence, physical fitness, and academic achievement in young school-aged children. Biomed Res Int2021; 2021: 6631365.
