Some coaches are convinced that controlling practices will not harm their athletes if they simultaneously are warm and caring. This study, grounded in Self-Determination Theory and Skinner's coping framework, explored these convictions among 179 volleyball players (67.6% female; age = 21.12 ± 4.66 years). Participants assessed perceived controlling and relatedness-supportive coaching styles, their coping strategies, self-reported performance, engagement, competitive anxiety, and burnout. Results showed that controlling coaching related to reduced performance, and more competitive anxiety and burnout. Controlling coaching associated indirectly with these athletes’ outcomes through compulsive compliance. Finally, when coaches were perceived to display moderate or high levels of relatedness-support, controlling coaching related to worse performance, and more competitive anxiety. These results suggest that a closer coach-athlete bond may exacerbate the detrimental impact of controlling coaching, as athletes feel internally pressured to obey the coach's demands without internally accepting these commands.
BartholomewKJNtoumanisNThøgersen-NtoumaniC. A review of controlling motivational strategies from a self-determination theory perspective: implications for sports coaches. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol2009; 2: 215–233.
2.
KeeganRSprayCHarwoodC, et al.The motivational atmosphere in youth sport: coach, parent, and peer influences on motivation in specializing sport participants. J Appl Sport Psychol2010; 22: 87–105.
3.
GuillénFMartínez-AlvaradoJR. The Sport Engagement Scale: An adaptation of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Universitas Psychologica13. Epub ahead of print 27 March 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.upsy13-3.sesa.
4.
GucciardiDFStamatisANtoumanisN. Controlling coaching and athlete thriving in elite adolescent netballers: the buffering effect of athletes’ mental toughness. J Sci Med Sport2017; 20: 718–722.
5.
RiceSMPurcellRDe SilvaS, et al.The mental health of elite athletes: a narrative systematic review. Sports Med2016; 46: 1333–1353.
6.
CurranTHillAPHallHK, et al.Perceived coach behaviors and athletes’ engagement and disaffection in youth sport: the mediating role of the psychological needs. Int J Sport Psychol2014; 45: 559–580.
7.
CorreiaMERosadoA. Fear of failure and anxiety in sport. Analise Psicologica2018; 36: 75–86.
8.
PonsetiFJAlmeidaPLLameirasJ, et al.Self-Determined Motivation and Competitive Anxiety in Athletes/Students: A Probabilistic Study Using Bayesian Networks. Front Psychol10. Epub ahead of print 6 September 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01947.
9.
AlvarezOTormo-BarahonaLCastilloI, et al.Examining controlling styles of significant others and their implications for motivation, boredom and burnout in young swimmers. Int J Environ Res Public Health18. Epub ahead of print 1 June 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115828.
10.
RaedekeTD. Is athlete burnout more than just stress? A sport commitment perspective. J Sport Exerc Psychol1997; 19: 396–417.
11.
ParnabasVATeknologiUMalaysiaM, et al.Competitive State Anxiety and Performance among Malaysian Athletes from the view of Multidimensional Anxiety Theory Sport Science and Recreation Faculty. 2013.
12.
LemelinEVerner-FilionJCarpentierJ, et al.Supplemental material for autonomy support in sport contexts: the role of parents and coaches in the promotion of athlete well-being and performance. Sport Exerc Perform Psychol2022; 11: 305–319.
13.
CheonSHReeveJLeeJ, et al.Giving and receiving autonomy support in a high-stakes sport context: a field-based experiment during the 2012 London paralympic games. Psychol Sport Exerc2015; 19: 59–69.
14.
HaerensLVansteenkisteMDe MeesterA, et al.Different combinations of perceived autonomy support and control: identifying the most optimal motivating style. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy2018; 23: 16–36.
15.
MahoneyJWGucciardiDFNtoumanisN, et al.Mental toughness in sport: motivational antecedents and associations with performance and psychological health. J Sport Exerc Psychol2014; 36: 281–292.
16.
RyanRMDeciEL. Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness, www.guilford.com/p/ryan (2017).
BartholomewKJNtoumanisNRyanRM, et al.Self-determination theory and diminished functioning: the role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting. Pers Soc Psychol Bull2011; 37: 1459–1473.
19.
Moreno-MurciaJAHernándezEHMarínLC, et al.Coaches’ motivational style and athletes’ fear of failure. Int J Environ Res Public Health16. Epub ahead of print 1 May 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091563.
20.
RamisYTorregrosaMViladrichC, et al.The effect of coaches’ controlling style on the competitive anxiety of young athletes. Front Psychol8. Epub ahead of print 12 April 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00572.
21.
BrenningKMAntropIVan PetegemS, et al.I won’t obey!: psychologically controlling parenting and (non)-clinical Adolescents’ responses to rule-setting. J Clin Psychol2019; 75: 1034–1046.
22.
FlamantNHaerensLMabbeE, et al.How do adolescents deal with intrusive parenting? The role of coping with psychologically controlling parenting in internalizing and externalizing problems. J Adolesc2020; 84: 200–212.
23.
Van PetegemSZimmer-GembeckMJSoenensB, et al.Does general parenting context modify Adolescents’ appraisals and coping with a situation of parental regulation? The case of autonomy-supportive parenting. J Child Fam Stud2017; 26: 2623–2639.
24.
SkinnerEAPitzerJRBruleHA. The Role of Emotion in Engagement, Coping, and the Development of Motivational Resilience. 2014.
25.
Zimmer-GembeckMJSkinnerEA. The development of coping: Implications for psychopathology and resilience. 3rd ed.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2016, pp.485–545.
26.
SkinnerEAEdgeKAltmanJ, et al.Searching for the structure of coping: a review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychol Bull2003; 129: 216–269.
27.
FlamantNHaerensLLoeysT, et al.Help, my teacher is pressuring me!’ The role of students’ coping with controlling teaching in motivation and engagement. Motiv Emot2023; 47: 739–760.
28.
FlamantNBoncquetMVan PetegemS, et al.To endure or to resist? Adolescents’ coping with overprotective parenting. J Appl Dev Psychol82. Epub ahead of print 1 July 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2022.101444.
29.
SparksCDimmockJLonsdaleC, et al.Modeling indicators and outcomes of students’ perceived teacher relatedness support in high school physical education. Psychol Sport Exerc2016; 26: 71–82.
30.
VansteenkisteMSoenensB. Vitamines Voor Groei: Ontwikkeling Voeden Vanuit De Zelf-Determinatie Theorie. Leuven: Acco, 2015.
31.
Lara-BercialSMallettCJ. The practices and developmental pathways of professional and Olympic serial winning coaches. Int Sport Coach J2016; 3: 221–239.
32.
SmithMMSaklofskeDHKeeferKV, et al.Coping strategies and psychological outcomes: the moderating effects of personal resiliency. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied2016; 150: 318–332.
33.
KaeferAChiviacowskyS. Relatedness support enhances motivation, positive affect, and motor learning in adolescents. Hum Mov Sci79. Epub ahead of print 1 October 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2021.102864.
34.
IngugliaCIngogliaSLigaF, et al.Autonomy and relatedness in adolescence and emerging adulthood: relationships with parental support and psychological distress. J Adult Dev2015; 22: 1–13.
35.
SmithNQuestedEAppletonPR, et al.Observing the coach-created motivational environment across training and competition in youth sport. J Sports Sci2017; 35: 149–158.
36.
AunolaKNurmiJE. Maternal affection moderates the impact of psychological control on a child’s mathematical performance. Dev Psychol2004; 40: 965–978.
37.
SoenensBVansteenkisteM. A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory. Dev Rev2010; 30: 74–99.
38.
AunolaKNurmiJ-E. The role of parenting styles in children’s problem behavior. Child Dev2005; 76: 1144–1159.
39.
WoutersSDoumenSGermeijsV, et al.Contingencies of self-worth in early adolescence: the antecedent role of perceived parenting. Social Development2013; 22: 242–258.
40.
GargurevichRSoenensB. Psychologically controlling parenting and personality vulnerability to depression: a study in Peruvian late adolescents. J Child Fam Stud2016; 25: 911–921.
41.
ChoiHJeongYKimSK. The relationship between coaching behavior and athlete burnout: mediating effects of communication and the coach– athlete relationship. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 1–17.
42.
HayesAFCouttsJJ. Use Omega rather than cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But…. Commun Methods Meas2020; 14: 1–24.
43.
RocchiMPelletierLDesmaraisP. The validity of the interpersonal behaviors questionnaire (IBQ) in sport. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci2017; 21: 15–25.
44.
SkinnerEAKindermannTAFurrerCJ. A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educ Psychol Meas2009; 69: 493–525.
45.
CoxRHMartensMPRussellWD. Measuring anxiety in athletics: the revised competitive state anxiety inventory–2. J Sport Exerc Psychol2003; 25: 519–533.
46.
RaedekeTDSmithAL. Development and preliminary validation of an athlete burnout measure. J Sport Exerc Psychol2001; 23: 281–306.
47.
Connor-SmithJKCompasBEWadsworthME, et al.Responses to stress in adolescence: measurement of coping and involuntary stress responses. J Consult Clin Psychol2000; 68: 976–992.
48.
GarnefskiNKraaijV. Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire - development of a short 18-item version (CERQ-short). Pers Individ Dif2006; 41: 1045–1053.
49.
ChenBSoenensBVansteenkisteM, et al.Where do the cultural differences in dynamics of controlling parenting lie? Adolescents as active agents in the perception of and coping with parental behavior. Psychol Belg2016; 56: 169–192.
50.
OjanenTPerryDG. Relational schemas and the developing self: perceptions of mother and of self as joint predictors of early Adolescents’ self-esteem. Dev Psychol2007; 43: 1474–1483.
51.
BaudatSZimmermannGAntoniettiJ-P, et al.The role of maternal communication style in adolescents’ motivation to change alcohol use: a vignette-based study. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy2017; 24: 152–162.
52.
SkinnerEAZimmer-GembeckMJ. The development of coping. Annu Rev Psychol2007; 58: 119–144.
53.
VansteenkisteMSoenensBVan PetegemS, et al.Longitudinal associations between adolescent perceived degree and style of parental prohibition and internalization and defiance. Dev Psychol2014; 50: 229–236.
54.
HuLTBentlerPM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling1999; 6: 1–55.
55.
GilletNVallerandRJAmouraS, et al.Influence of coaches’ autonomy support on athletes’ motivation and sport performance: a test of the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Psychol Sport Exerc2010; 11: 155–161.
56.
GiacobbiPRJrRoperEWhitneyJ, et al.College coaches’ views about the development of successful athletes: a descriptive exploratory investigation. J Sport Behav2002; 25: 164–180.
57.
FavorJK. The relationship between personality traits and coachability in NCAA divisions I and II female softball athletes. International Journal of Sport Science & Coaching2011; 6: 301–314.
58.
AssorAKaplanHKanat-MaymonY, et al.Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: the role of anger and anxiety. Learn Instr2005; 15: 397–413.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
