A paradox of tournament seeding

Abstract

We analyse a mathematical model of seeding for sports contests with round-robin qualifying tournaments. The standard seeding system based on coefficients measuring the historical performance of the teams is shown to be unfair as it might potentially punish a team for its better results by having to face stronger opponents on average in the next stage. Major football competitions are revealed to suffer from this weakness. Incentive compatibility can be guaranteed by providing each qualified team with the highest coefficient of all teams that are ranked lower in its qualifying tournament for seeding purposes. Our proposal is illustrated by the 2020/21 UEFA Champions League.

Keywords

Association football,incentive compatibility,round-robin competition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Szymanski

. The economic design of sporting contests. J Econ Lit 2003; 41: 1137–1187.

Vaziri

Dabadghao

Yih

, et al. Properties of sports ranking methods. J Oper Res Soc 2018; 69: 776–787.

Kendall

Lenten

LJA

. When sports rules go awry. Eur J Oper Res 2017; 257: 377–394.

Pauly

. Can strategizing in round-robin subtournaments be avoided? Soc Choice Welfare 2014; 43: 29–46.

Vong

AIK

. Strategic manipulation in tournament games. Games Econ Behav 2017; 102: 562–567.

Dagaev

Sonin

. Winning by losing: incentive incompatibility in multiple qualifiers. J Sports Econom 2018; 19: 1122–1146.

Csató

. The incentive (in)compatibility of group-based qualification systems. Int J Gen Syst 2020; 49: 374–399.

Csató

. When neither team wants to win: A flaw of recent UEFA qualification rules. Int J Sports Sci Coach 2020; 15: 526–532.

Csató

. Tournament Design: How Operations Research Can Improve Sports Rules. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Pivots in Sports Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.

10.

Csató

. Quantifying incentive (in)compatibility: A case study from sports. Eur J Oper Res 2022; 302: 717–726.

11.

Krumer

Megidish

Sela

. Strategic manipulations in round-robin tournaments. Manuscript. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339254201, 2020.

12.

Lenten

LJA

Kendall

. Scholarly sports: influence of social science academe on sports rules and policy. J Oper Res Soc 2021. in press. DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2021.2000896.

13.

Arlegi

Dimitrov

. Fair elimination-type competitions. Eur J Oper Res 2020; 287: 528–535.

14.

Dagaev

Suzdaltsev

. Competitive intensity and quality maximizing seedings in knock-out tournaments. J Comb Optim 2018; 35: 170–188.

15.

Della Croce

Dragotto

Scatamacchia

. On fairness and diversification in WTA and ATP tennis tournaments generation. Ann Oper Res 2022; 316: 1107–1119.

16.

Groh

Moldovanu

Sela

, et al. Optimal seedings in elimination tournaments. Economic Theory 2012; 49: 59–80.

17.

Horen

Riezman

. Comparing draws for single elimination tournaments. Oper Res 1985; 33: 249–262.

18.

Hwang

. New concepts in seeding knockout tournaments. Am Math Mon 1982; 89: 235–239.

19.

Schwenk

. What is the correct way to seed a knockout tournament? Am Math Mon 2000; 107: 140–150.

20.

Cea

Durán

Guajardo

, et al. An analytics approach to the FIFA ranking procedure and the World Cup final draw. Ann Oper Res 2020; 286: 119–146.

21.

Csató

. Group draw with unknown qualified teams: a lesson from 2022 FIFA World Cup. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 2022, in press. DOI: 10.1177/17479541221108799.

22.

Guyon

. Rethinking the FIFA World Cup^TM final draw. J Quant Anal Sports 2015; 11: 169–182.

23.

Laliena

López

. Fair draws for group rounds in sport tournaments. Int Trans Oper Res 2019; 26: 439–457.

24.

Scarf

Yusof

. A numerical study of tournament structure and seeding policy for the soccer World Cup Finals. Stat Neerl 2011; 65: 43–57.

25.

Corona

Forrest

Tena

, et al. Bayesian forecasting of UEFA Champions League under alternative seeding regimes. Int J Forecast 2019; 35: 722–732.

26.

Dagaev

Rudyak

. Seeding the UEFA Champions League participants: evaluation of the reform. J Quant Anal Sports 2019; 15: 129–140.

27.

Engist

Merkus

Schafmeister

. The effect of seeding on tournament outcomes: Evidence from a regression-discontinuity design. J Sports Econom 2021; 22: 115–136.

28.

Monks

Husch

. The impact of seeding, home continent, and hosting on FIFA World Cup results. J Sports Econom 2009; 10: 391–408.

29.

Csató

. The UEFA Champions League seeding is not strategy-proof since the 2015/16 season. Ann Oper Res 2020; 292: 161–169.

30.

Csató

. UEFA Champions League entry has not satisfied strategyproofness in three seasons. J Sports Econom 2019; 20: 975–981.

31.

UEFA. Regulations of the UEFA Europa League 2018-21 Cycle. 2020/21 Season. 2020. http://web.archive.org/web/20210517095618/https://documents.uefa.com/r/Regulations-of-the-UEFA-Europa-League-2020/21-Online.

32.

Csató

. How to design a multi-stage tournament when some results are carried over? OR Spectrum 2022; 44: 683–707.

33.

BBC. Leicester City win Premier League title after Tottenham draw at Chelsea. 2016, 2 May. https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/35988673.

34.

Lasek

Gagolewski

. The efficacy of league formats in ranking teams. Stat Modelling 2018; 18: 411–435.

35.

McGarry

Schutz

. Efficacy of traditional sport tournament structures. J Oper Res Soc 1997; 48: 65–74.

36.

Scarf

Yusof

Bilbao

. A numerical study of designs for sporting contests. Eur J Oper Res 2009; 198: 190–198.

37.

Sziklai

Biró

Csató

. The efficacy of tournament designs. Comput Oper Res 2022; 144:105821.

38.

Kassies

. UEFA Coefficients calculation method. https://kassiesa.net/uefa/calc.html, 2022.

39.

UEFA. How the club coefficients are calculated. 2018, 1 July. https://www.uefa.com/nationalassociations/uefarankings/news/0252-0cda38714c0d-0874ab234eb6-1000--how-the-club-coefficients-are-calculated/.

40.

Csató

. UEFA against the champions? An evaluation of the recent reform of the Champions League qualification. J Sports Econom 2022d; 23: 991–1016.

41.

UEFA. Regulations of the UEFA Champions League 2018-21 Cycle. 2020/21 Season. 2020, http://web.archive.org/web/20210603140626/https://documents.uefa.com/r/Regulations-of-the-UEFA-Champions-League-2020/21-Online.

42.

UEFA. Champions’ bonus for group stage draw. 2015, 24 April. https://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/news/0220-0e15f38d3608-4437365f0e2f-1000--champions-bonus-for-group-stage-draw/.

43.

Guyon

. Champions League: How to Solve the Seeding Problem. The New York Times. 21 January. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/22/upshot/champions-league-how-to-solve-the-seeding-problem.html, 2015.

44.

Haugen

Krumer

. On importance of tournament design in sports management: Evidence from the UEFA Euro 2020 qualification. In: Ratten V (ed) Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Sport Management. New York: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021, pp. 22–35.